XCode 12 ships with mismatched platforms for these libraries,
so this hack is necessary...
Fixes PR49799.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100913
The reexport-nested-libs test added in D97438 was a bit wonky.
First, it was linking against libReexportSystem.tbd which targets the
iOS simulator, and which in turn attempted to re-export the iOS
simulator's libSystem. However, due to the way `-syslibroot` works, it
was actually re-exporting the macOS libSystem.
As a result, the test was not actually able to resolve the symbols in
the desired libSystem. I'm guessing that @oontvoo was confused by this
and therefore included those symbols in libReexportSystem.tbd itself.
But this means that the test wasn't actually testing the resolution of
re-exported symbols (though it did at least verify that the re-exported
libraries could be located).
After some consideration, I figured that stub-link.s could be extended
to cover what reexport-nested-libs.s was attempting to do. The test
targets macOS, so we only have one `-syslibroot` and no chance of
confusion.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, oontvoo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97866
Currently, it was delibrately impleneted to not handle this case, but as it has turnt out, we need this feature.
The concrete use case is
`System/Library/Frameworks/Cocoa.framework/Versions/A/Cocoa` reexports
/System/Library/Frameworks/AppKit.framework/Versions/C/AppKit , which then rexports
/System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/UIFoundation.framework/Versions/A/UIFoundation
The current implemention uses a global currentTopLevelTapi, which is not reset until it finishes loading the whole tree.
This is a problem because if the top-level is set to Cocoa, then when we get to UIFoundation, it will try to find UIFoundation in the current top level, which is Cocoa and will not find it.
The right thing should be:
- When loading a library from a TBD file, re-exports need to be looked up in the auxiliary documents within the same TBD.
- When loading from an actual dylib, no additional TBD documents need to be examined.
- In no case does a re-export mentioned in one TBD file need to be looked up in a document in an auxiliary document from a different TBD file
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97438
For -flat_namespace, lld needs to load dylibs in LC_LOAD_DYLIB.
The current setup meant that libSystem.dylib would cause a LC_LOAD_DYLIB
with libSystem.B.dylib, but that didn't exist in our libsysroot for
tests. So just drop the .B.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D97641#2595237 and
https://reviews.llvm.org/D97641#2595270
It seems to be failing on some Google Buildbots.
This diff also includes a minor fix for the install name of one of
libSystem's re-exports. I don't think it's the cause of the test
failure, though. The wrong install name just meant that the symbol
lookup failure would still happen, but it would have been caused by the
re-export not being found, instead of the arch failing to match.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86728
The re-exports list in a TAPI document can either refer to other inlined
TAPI documents, or to on-disk files (which may themselves be TBD or
regular files.) Similarly, the re-exports of a regular dylib can refer
to a TBD file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85404
Add support to lld to use Text Based API stubs for linking. This is
support is incomplete not filtering out platforms. It also does not
account for architecture specific API handling and potentially does not
correctly handle trees of re-exports with inlined libraries being
treated as direct children of the top level library.
Jez Ng