Eliminate library calls and intrinsic calls to fabs when the input
is a squared value.
Note that no unsafe-math / fast-math assumptions are needed for
this optimization.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5777
llvm-svn: 219717
Sign-/zero-extend folding depended on the load and the integer extend to be
both selected by FastISel. This cannot always be garantueed and SelectionDAG
might interfer. This commit adds additonal checks to load and integer extend
lowering to catch this.
Related to rdar://problem/18495928.
llvm-svn: 219716
Clang r219557 introduces libcalls to complex multiply/divide functions.
Since these functions are not available in iOS for arm64 devices, add them to
the static libraries.
llvm-svn: 219715
This moves some code from SemaType.cpp's hasVisibleDefinition() into
DeclCXX.cpp so that it can be used elsewhere. I found one other instance
of code trying to do the same thing, there are probably more. Search for
getInstantiatedFrom() to try to find more.
No functionality change.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5783
llvm-svn: 219714
We assumed that A must be greater than B because the right hand side of
a remainder operator must be nonzero.
However, it is possible for A to be less than B if Pow2 is a power of
two greater than 1.
Take for example:
i32 %A = 0
i32 %B = 31
i32 Pow2 = 2147483648
((Pow2 << 0) >>u 31) is non-zero but A is less than B.
This fixes PR21274.
llvm-svn: 219713
The main issue was if you didn't specify all three (stdin/out/err), you would get file actions added to the launch that would always use the pseudo terminal. This is now fixed.
Also fixed the test suite test that handles IO to test redirecting things individually and all together and in other combinations to make sure we don't regress.
<rdar://problem/18638226>
llvm-svn: 219711
This effectively reverts revert 219707. After fixing the test to work with
new function name format and renamed intrinsic.
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <tom@stellard.net>
Signed-off-by: Jan Vesely <jan.vesely@rutgers.edu>
llvm-svn: 219710
Reapply r216913, a fix for PR20832 by Andrea Di Biagio. The commit was reverted
because of buildbot failures, and credit goes to Ulrich Weigand for isolating
the underlying issue (which can be confirmed by Valgrind, which does helpfully
light up like the fourth of July). Uli explained the problem with the original
patch as:
It seems the problem is calling multiplySignificand with an addend of category
fcZero; that is not expected by this routine. Note that for fcZero, the
significand parts are simply uninitialized, but the code in (or rather, called
from) multiplySignificand will unconditionally access them -- in effect using
uninitialized contents.
This version avoids using a category == fcZero addend within
multiplySignificand, which avoids this problem (the Valgrind output is also now
clean).
Original commit message:
[APFloat] Fixed a bug in method 'fusedMultiplyAdd'.
When folding a fused multiply-add builtin call, make sure that we propagate the
correct result in the case where the addend is zero, and the two other operands
are finite non-zero.
Example:
define double @test() {
%1 = call double @llvm.fma.f64(double 7.0, double 8.0, double 0.0)
ret double %1
}
Before this patch, the instruction simplifier wrongly folded the builtin call
in function @test to constant 'double 7.0'.
With this patch, method 'fusedMultiplyAdd' correctly evaluates the multiply and
propagates the expected result (i.e. 56.0).
Added test fold-builtin-fma.ll with the reproducible from PR20832 plus extra
test cases to verify the behavior of method 'fusedMultiplyAdd' in the presence
of NaN/Inf operands.
This fixes PR20832.
llvm-svn: 219708
v2: Add SI lowering
Add test
v3: Place work dimensions after the kernel arguments.
v4: Calculate offset while lowering arguments
v5: rebase
v6: change prefix to AMDGPU
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <tom@stellard.net>
Signed-off-by: Jan Vesely <jan.vesely@rutgers.edu>
llvm-svn: 219705
Summary:
In order to facilitate use of common code, checking by reviewers of other fast-isel ports, and hopefully to eventually move most of Mips and other fast-isel ports into target independent code, I've tried to get the two implementations to line up.
There is no functional code change. Just methods moved in the file to be in the same order as in AArch64.
Test Plan: No functional change.
Reviewers: dsanders
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: llvm-commits, aemerson, rfuhler
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5692
llvm-svn: 219703
Let me tell you a tale...
Originally committed in r211723 after discovering a nasty case of weird
scoping due to inlining, this was reverted in r211724 after it fired in
ASan/compiler-rt.
(minor diversion where I accidentally committed/reverted again in
r211871/r211873)
After further testing and fixing bugs in ArgumentPromotion (r211872) and
Inlining (r212065) it was recommitted in r212085. Reverted in r212089
after the sanitizer buildbots still showed problems.
Fixed another bug in ArgumentPromotion (r212128) found by this
assertion.
Recommitted in r212205, reverted in r212226 after it crashed some more
on sanitizer buildbots.
Fix clang some more in r212761.
Recommitted in r212776, reverted in r212793. ASan failures.
Recommitted in r213391, reverted in r213432, trying to reproduce flakey
ASan build failure.
Fixed bugs in r213805 (ArgPromo + DebugInfo), r213952
(LiveDebugVariables strips dbg_value intrinsics in functions not
described by debug info).
Recommitted in r214761, reverted in r214999, flakey failure on Windows
buildbot.
Fixed DeadArgElimination + DebugInfo bug in r219210.
Recommitted in r219215, reverted in r219512, failure on ObjC++ atomic
properties in the test-suite on Darwin.
Fixed ObjC++ atomic properties issue in Clang in r219690.
[This commit is provided 'as is' with no hope that this is the last time
I commit this change either expressed or implied]
llvm-svn: 219702
The build fails due to missing asan runtime in the FreeBSD base system.
Instead of marking it expected fail, just skip until we have the runtime
available.
llvm.org/pr21136
llvm-svn: 219701
Mangling for blocks defined within blocks in an ObjectiveC context were also
broken by SVN r219393. Because the code in mangleName assumed that the code was
either C or C++, we would trigger assertions when trying to mangle the inner
blocks in an ObjectiveC context.
Add a test and use the ObjectiveC specific mangling when dealing with an
ObjectiveC method declaration.
llvm-svn: 219697
This addresses a regression introduced with SVN r219393. A block may be
contained within another block. In such a scenario, we would end up within a
BlockDecl, which is not a NamedDecl (as the names are synthesised). The cast to
a NamedDecl of the DeclContext would then assert as the types are unrelated.
Restore the mangling behaviour to that prior to SVN r219393. If the current
block is contained within a BlockDecl, walk up to the parent DeclContext,
recursively, until we have a non-BlockDecl. This is expected to be a NamedDecl.
Add in a couple of asserts to ensure that the assumption that we only encounter
a block within a NamedDecl or a BlockDecl.
llvm-svn: 219696
CodeGenFunction objects aren't really designed to be reused for more
than one function, and doing so can leak debug info location information
from one function into the prologue of the next.
Add an assertion in to catch reuses of CodeGenFunction, which
surprisingly only caught the ObjC atomic getter/setter cases. Fix those
and add a test to demonstrate the issue.
The test is a bit slim, because we're just testing for the absence of a
debug location on the prologue instructions, which by itself probably
wouldn't be the end of the world - but the particular debug location
that was ending up there was for the previous function's last
instruction. This produced debug info for another function within this
function, which is something I'm trying to remove all cases of as its a
substantial source of bugs, especially around inlining (see r219215).
llvm-svn: 219690
This addresses this bug:
http://www.llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21267
Which has been broken since svn r215256 on Aug 8 2014.
DO NOT REVERT THIS COMMIT EVEN IF IT CREATES TEST FAILURES.
The test failures are a result of accumulation of hidden failures
that were masked by the bug this change fixes. Most of our test
runners as part of build testing rely on dotest.py returning non-zero to indicate
some kind of errant test run. Thus, we have been flying blind
since Aug 8 2014.
llvm-svn: 219689
When LazyValueInfo uses @llvm.assume intrinsics to provide edge-value
constraints, we should check for intrinsics that dominate the edge's branch,
not just any potential context instructions. An assumption that dominates the
edge's branch represents a truth on that edge. This is specifically useful, for
example, if multiple predecessors assume a pointer to be nonnull, allowing us
to simplify a later null comparison.
The test case, and an initial patch, were provided by Philip Reames. Thanks!
llvm-svn: 219688
This change fixes 2 issues in the fast unwinder from r217079:
* A crash if a frame pointer points below current stack head, but
inside the current thread stack limits. That memory may be
unmapped. A check for this was lost in r217079.
* The last valid stack frame (the first one with an invalid next
frame pointer) is always interpreted as a GCC layout frame. This
results in garbled last PC in the (expected) case when the last
frame has LLVM layout.
llvm-svn: 219683
Updated the URL to reflect information on the problem as well as build the
case for ARM. This seems to be a wider problem, not ARM or PPC specific.
llvm-svn: 219680
Allows to specify the unwinder to use for CHECK failures. Previous behaviour
was to use the "fatal" unwinder.
As compiler-rt is built without frame pointers, only the slow unwinder
really makes sense here, and it is the default.
llvm-svn: 219677
The current handling (manual execution of atexit callbacks)
is overly complex and leads to constant problems due to mutual ordering of callbacks.
Instead simply wrap callbacks into our wrapper to establish
the necessary synchronization.
Fixes issue https://code.google.com/p/thread-sanitizer/issues/detail?id=80
llvm-svn: 219675
and TargetRegisterInfo in the peephole optimizer. This
makes it easier to grab subtarget dependent variables off
of the MachineFunction rather than the TargetMachine.
llvm-svn: 219669
Sanjay Patel