This restores commit r260408, along with a fix for a bot failure.
The bot failure was caused by dereferencing a unique_ptr in the same
call instruction parameter list where it was passed via std::move.
Apparently due to luck this was not exposed when I built the compiler
with clang, only with gcc.
llvm-svn: 260442
Summary:
This patch uses the lower 64-bits of the MD5 hash of a function name as
a GUID in the function index, instead of storing function names. Any
local functions are first given a global name by prepending the original
source file name. This is the same naming scheme and GUID used by PGO in
the indexed profile format.
This change has a couple of benefits. The primary benefit is size
reduction in the combined index file, for example 483.xalancbmk's
combined index file was reduced by around 70%. It should also result in
memory savings for the index file in memory, as the in-memory map is
also indexed by the hash instead of the string.
Second, this enables integration with indirect call promotion, since the
indirect call profile targets are recorded using the same global naming
convention and hash. This will enable the function importer to easily
locate function summaries for indirect call profile targets to enable
their import and subsequent promotion.
The original source file name is recorded in the bitcode in a new
module-level record for use in the ThinLTO backend pipeline.
Reviewers: davidxl, joker.eph
Subscribers: llvm-commits, joker.eph
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17028
llvm-svn: 260408
This fixes a bug found while working on the bitcode reader. In
particular, the method BitstreamReader::AtEndOfStream doesn't always
behave correctly when processing a data streamer. The method
fillCurWord doesn't properly set CurWord/BitsInCurWord if the data
streamer was already at eof, but GetBytes had not yet set the
ObjectSize field of the streaming memory object.
This patch fixes this problem, and provides a test to show that
this problem has been fixed.
Patch by Karl Schimpf.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11391
llvm-svn: 243890
When trying to upgrade @llvm.x86.sse2.psrl.dq while parsing a module,
BitcodeReader adds the function to its worklist twice, resulting in a
crash when accessing it the second time.
This patch replaces the worklist vector by a map.
Patch by Philip Pfaffe.
llvm-svn: 241281
Before this patch the bitcode reader would read a module from a file
that contained in order:
* Any number of non MODULE_BLOCK sub blocks.
* One MODULE_BLOCK
* Any number of non MODULE_BLOCK sub blocks.
* 4 '\n' characters to handle OS X's ranlib.
Since we support lazy reading of modules, any information that is relevant
for the module has to be in the MODULE_BLOCK or before it. We don't gain
anything from checking what is after.
This patch then changes the reader to stop once the MODULE_BLOCK has been
successfully parsed.
This avoids the ugly special case for .bc files in an archive and makes it
easier to embed bitcode files.
llvm-svn: 239845
Source for the test:
@bloom = global <3 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1, i32 42>
Plus bit twiddling to set the vector numelts to 0 (in the bc file).
llvm-svn: 238894
Summary:
Also tagged a FIXME comment, and added information about why it breaks.
Bug found using AFL fuzz.
Reviewers: rafael, craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9729
llvm-svn: 237709
Summary:
Added isLoadableOrStorableType to PointerType.
We were doing some checks in some places, occasionally assert()ing instead
of telling the caller. With this patch, I'm putting all type checking in
the same place for load/store type instructions, and verifying the same
thing every time.
I also added a check for load/store of a function type.
Applied extracted check to Load, Store, and Cmpxcg.
I don't have exhaustive tests for all of these, but all Error() calls in
TypeCheckLoadStoreInst are being tested (in invalid.test).
Reviewers: dblaikie, rafael
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9785
llvm-svn: 237619
Summary:
We don't seem to need to assert here, since this function's callers expect
to get a nullptr on error. This way we don't assert on user input.
Bug found with AFL fuzz.
Reviewers: rafael
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9308
llvm-svn: 236027
Summary:
Make sure the abbrev operands are valid and that we can read/skip them
afterwards.
Bug found with AFL fuzz.
Reviewers: rafael
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9030
llvm-svn: 235595
Use an extra bit in the CCInfo to flag the newer version of the
instructiont hat includes the type explicitly.
Tested the newer error cases I added, but didn't add tests for the finer
granularity improvements to existing error paths.
llvm-svn: 235160
Summary:
Without this check the following case failed:
Skip a SubBlock which is not a MODULE_BLOCK_ID nor a BLOCKINFO_BLOCK_ID
Got to end of file
TheModule would still be == nullptr, and we would subsequentially fail
when materializing the Module (assert at the start of
BitcodeReader::MaterializeModule).
Bug found with AFL.
Reviewers: dexonsmith, rafael
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9014
llvm-svn: 234887
(turns out I had regressed this when sinking handling of this type down
into GetElementPtrInst::Create - since that asserted before the error
handling was performed)
llvm-svn: 232420
While fuzzing LLVM bitcode files, I discovered that (1) the bitcode reader doesn't check that alignments are no larger than 2**29; (2) downstream code doesn't check the range; and (3) for values out of range, corresponding large memory requests (based on alignment size) will fail. This code fixes the bitcode reader to check for valid alignments, fixing this problem.
This CL fixes alignment value on global variables, functions, and instructions: alloca, load, load atomic, store, store atomic.
Patch by Karl Schimpf (kschimpf@google.com).
llvm-svn: 230180
Summary:
When creating {insert,extract}value instructions from a BitcodeReader, we
weren't verifying the fields were valid.
Bugs found with afl-fuzz
Reviewers: rafael
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7325
llvm-svn: 229345
Eventually we can make some of these pass the error along to the caller.
Reports a fatal error if:
We find an invalid abbrev record
We try to get an invalid abbrev number
We can't fill the current word due to an EOF
Fixed an invalid bitcode test to check for output with FileCheck
Bugs found with afl-fuzz
llvm-svn: 226986
Teresa Johnson