protector insertion not working correctly with unreachable code. Since that
revision was rolled out, this test doesn't actual fail before this fix.
llvm-svn: 127497
they all ready do). This removes two dominator recomputations prior to isel,
which is a 1% improvement in total llc time for 403.gcc.
The only potentially suspect thing is making GCStrategy recompute dominators if
it used a custom lowering strategy.
llvm-svn: 123064
must be called in the pass's constructor. This function uses static dependency declarations to recursively initialize
the pass's dependencies.
Clients that only create passes through the createFooPass() APIs will require no changes. Clients that want to use the
CommandLine options for passes will need to manually call the appropriate initialization functions in PassInitialization.h
before parsing commandline arguments.
I have tested this with all standard configurations of clang and llvm-gcc on Darwin. It is possible that there are problems
with the static dependencies that will only be visible with non-standard options. If you encounter any crash in pass
registration/creation, please send the testcase to me directly.
llvm-svn: 116820
LLVM IR code and not in the selection DAG ISel. This is a cleaner solution.
- Fix the heuristic for determining if protectors are necessary. The previous
one wasn't checking the proper type size.
llvm-svn: 58824
- stackprotector_prologue creates a stack object and stores the guard there.
- stackprotector_epilogue reads the stack guard from the stack position created
by stackprotector_prologue.
- The PrologEpilogInserter was changed to make sure that the stack guard is
first on the stack frame.
llvm-svn: 58791
"getOrInsertFunction" in that it either adds a new declaration of the global
and returns it, or returns the current one -- optionally casting it to the
correct type.
- Use the new getOrInsertGlobal in the stack protector code.
- Use "splitBasicBlock" in the stack protector code.
llvm-svn: 58727
- Use enums instead of magic numbers.
- Rework algorithm to use the bytes size from the target to determine when to
emit stack protectors.
- Get rid of "propolice" in any comments.
- Renamed an option to its expanded form.
- Other miscellanenous changes.
More changes will come after this.
llvm-svn: 58723
* The prologue is modified to read the __stack_chk_guard global and insert it
onto the stack.
* The epilogue is modified to read the stored guard from the stack and compare
it to the original __stack_chk_guard value. If they differ, then the
__stack_chk_fail() function is called.
* The stack protector needs to be first on the stack (after the parameters) to
catch any stack-smashing activities.
Front-end support will follow after a round of beta testing.
llvm-svn: 58673
Bill Wendling