there's an explicit guard on isPolymorphic, and virtual bases don't affect the
key function calculation. This allows people to call
ASTContext::getKeyFunction on arbitrary classes.
llvm-svn: 107143
is stripped off. Currently set unconditionally, since the API
does not provide a way of working out if anything was actually
stripped off.
llvm-svn: 107142
of getPhysicalRegisterRegClass with it.
If we want to make a copy (or estimate its cost), it is better to use the
smallest class as more efficient operations might be possible.
llvm-svn: 107140
in terms of Op<> and ArgOffset. This works for
values of {0, 1} for ArgOffset.
Please note that ArgOffset will become 0 soon and
will go away eventually.
llvm-svn: 107129
instruction to an add scev, it's not safe to blindly transfer the
inbounds flag from a gep instruction to an nsw on the scev for the
gep.
llvm-svn: 107117
This is somewhat annoying to do this at this level, but it avoids
having ABIInfo know depend on CodeGenTypes for a hint.
Nothing is using this yet, so no functionality change.
llvm-svn: 107111
There are 2 changes relative to the previous version of the patch:
1) For the "simple" if-conversion case, there's no need to worry about
RemoveExtraEdges not handling an unanalyzable branch. Predicated terminators
are ignored in this context, so RemoveExtraEdges does the right thing.
This might break someday if we ever treat indirect branches (BRIND) as
predicable, but for now, I just removed this part of the patch, because
in the case where we do not add an unconditional branch, we rely on keeping
the fall-through edge to CvtBBI (which is empty after this transformation).
The change relative to the previous patch is:
@@ -1036,10 +1036,6 @@
IterIfcvt = false;
}
- // RemoveExtraEdges won't work if the block has an unanalyzable branch,
- // which is typically the case for IfConvertSimple, so explicitly remove
- // CvtBBI as a successor.
- BBI.BB->removeSuccessor(CvtBBI->BB);
RemoveExtraEdges(BBI);
// Update block info. BB can be iteratively if-converted.
2) My patch exposed a bug in the code for merging the tail of a "diamond",
which had previously never been exercised. The code was simply checking that
the tail had a single predecessor, but there was a case in
MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/dbms where that single predecessor was
neither edge of the diamond. I added the following change to check for
that:
@@ -1276,7 +1276,18 @@
// tail, add a unconditional branch to it.
if (TailBB) {
BBInfo TailBBI = BBAnalysis[TailBB->getNumber()];
- if (TailBB->pred_size() == 1 && !TailBBI.HasFallThrough) {
+ bool CanMergeTail = !TailBBI.HasFallThrough;
+ // There may still be a fall-through edge from BBI1 or BBI2 to TailBB;
+ // check if there are any other predecessors besides those.
+ unsigned NumPreds = TailBB->pred_size();
+ if (NumPreds > 1)
+ CanMergeTail = false;
+ else if (NumPreds == 1 && CanMergeTail) {
+ MachineBasicBlock::pred_iterator PI = TailBB->pred_begin();
+ if (*PI != BBI1->BB && *PI != BBI2->BB)
+ CanMergeTail = false;
+ }
+ if (CanMergeTail) {
MergeBlocks(BBI, TailBBI);
TailBBI.IsDone = true;
} else {
With these fixes, I was able to run all the SingleSource and MultiSource
tests successfully.
llvm-svn: 107110
Bruno Cardoso Lopes