Otherwise (when indenting from the wrapped -> or .), this looks
like a confusing indent.
Before:
aaaaaaa //
.aaaaaaa( //
aaaaaaa);
After:
aaaaaaa //
.aaaaaaa( //
aaaaaaa);
llvm-svn: 181595
Thereby, the macro is consistently formatted (including the trailing
escaped newlines) even if clang-format is invoked only on single lines
of the macro.
llvm-svn: 181590
Summary:
Adds actual config file reading to the clang-format utility.
Configuration file name is .clang-format. It is looked up for each input file
in its parent directories starting from immediate one. First found .clang-format
file is used. When using standard input, .clang-format is searched starting from
the current directory.
Added -dump-config option to easily create configuration files.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits, jordan_rose, kimgr
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D758
llvm-svn: 181589
If the LHS of a binary expression is broken, clang-format should also
break after the operator as otherwise:
- The RHS can be easy to miss
- It can look as if clang-format doesn't understand operator precedence
Before:
bool aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa !=
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb && ccccccccc == ddddddddddd;
After:
bool aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa =
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa != bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb &&
ccccccccc == ddddddddddd;
As an additional note, clang-format would also be ok with the following
formatting, it just has a higher penalty (IMO correctly so).
bool aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa !=
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb &&
ccccccccc == ddddddddddd;
llvm-svn: 181430
Before:
aaaaaaaa::
aaaaaaaa::
aaaaaaaa();
After:
aaaaaaaa::
aaaaaaaa::
aaaaaaaa();
The reason for the change is that:
a) we are not sure which is better
b) it is a really rare edge case
c) it simplifies the code
d) it currently causes problems with memoization
llvm-svn: 181421
Summary:
Added parseConfiguration method, which reads FormatStyle from YAML
string. This supports all FormatStyle fields and an additional BasedOnStyle
field, which can be used to specify base style.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D754
llvm-svn: 181326
LLVM/Clang basically don't use such comments and for Google-style,
include-lines are explicitly exempt from the column limit. Also, for
most cases, where the column limit is violated, the "better" solution
would be to move the comment to before the include, which clang-format
cannot do (yet).
llvm-svn: 181191
clang-format did not indent any declarations/definitions when breaking
after the type. With this change, it indents for all declarations but
does not indent for function definitions, i.e.:
Before:
const SomeLongTypeName&
some_long_variable_name;
typedef SomeLongTypeName
SomeLongTypeAlias;
const SomeLongReturnType*
SomeLongFunctionName();
const SomeLongReturnType*
SomeLongFunctionName() { ... }
After:
const SomeLongTypeName&
some_long_variable_name;
typedef SomeLongTypeName
SomeLongTypeAlias;
const SomeLongReturnType*
SomeLongFunctionName();
const SomeLongReturnType*
SomeLongFunctionName() { ... }
While it might seem inconsistent to indent function declarations, but
not definitions, there are two reasons for that:
- Function declarations are very similar to declarations of function
type variables, so there is another side to consistency to consider.
- There can be many function declarations on subsequent lines and not
indenting can make them harder to identify. Function definitions
are already separated by their body and not indenting
makes the function name slighly easier to find.
llvm-svn: 181187
Deeply nested expressions basically break clang-format's memoization.
This patch slightly improves the situations and makes expressions like
aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(
aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(
aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(
aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(aaaaa(
aaaaa(aaaaa())))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))));
work.
llvm-svn: 180264
This enables formattings like:
#define A \
int aaaa; \
int b; \
int ccc; \
int dddddddddd;
Enabling this for Google/Chromium styles only as I don't know whether it
is desired for Clang/LLVM.
llvm-svn: 180253
In the following snippet, clang-format incorrectly aligned the
trailing comment, when only the last line was formatted:
int aaaaaa; // comment
int b;
int c; // Formatting only this line moved this comment.
llvm-svn: 180173
In Google style, constructor initializers need to be all on one line or
one initializer per line if that does not fit. Without this patch, this
non-bin-packing-behavior incorrectly extends to the parameters of the
initializers.
Before:
Constructor()
: aaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa) {}
After:
Constructor()
: aaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa) {}
llvm-svn: 180001
Summary:
Added BreakableLineComment, moved common code from
BreakableBlockComment to newly added BreakableComment. As a side-effect of the
rewrite, found another problem with escaped newlines and had to change
code which removes trailing whitespace from line comments not to break after
this patch.
Reviewers: klimek, djasper
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D682
llvm-svn: 179693
We do this in general, but missed a few cases.
Before:
void aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, bbbb bbbb);
After:
void aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
bbbb bbbb);
llvm-svn: 179570
Summary:
Both strings and block comments are broken into lines in
breakProtrudingToken. Logic specific for strings or block comments is abstracted
in implementations of the BreakToken interface. Among other goodness, this
change fixes placement of backslashes after a block comment inside a
preprocessor directive (see removed FIXMEs in unit tests).
The code is far from being polished, and some parts of it will be changed for
line comments support.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D665
llvm-svn: 179526
Previously we'd only detect structural errors on the very first level.
This leads to incorrectly balanced braces not being discovered, and thus
incorrect indentation.
This change fixes the problem by:
- changing the parser to use an error state that can be detected
anywhere inside the productions, for example if we get an eof on
SOME_MACRO({ some block <eof>
- previously we'd never break lines when we discovered a structural
error; now we break even in the case of a structural error if there
are two unwrapped lines within the same line; thus,
void f() { while (true) { g(); y(); } }
will still be re-formatted, even if there's missing braces somewhere
in the file
- still exclude macro definitions from generating structural error;
macro definitions are inbalanced snippets
llvm-svn: 179379
Function declarations are now broken with the following preferences:
1) break amongst arguments.
2) break after return type.
3) break after (.
4) break before after nested name specifiers.
Options #2 or #3 are preferred over #1 only if a substantial number of
lines can be saved by that.
llvm-svn: 179287
Before:
class A {
public : // test
};
After:
class A {
public: // test
};
Also remove duplicate methods calculating properties of AnnotatedTokens
and make them members of AnnotatedTokens so that they are in a common
place.
llvm-svn: 179167
The idea is to indent according to operator precedence and pretty much
identical to how stuff would be indented with parenthesis.
Before:
bool value = aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa +
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa +
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ==
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa *
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb +
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb &&
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa *
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa >
ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc;
After:
bool value = aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa +
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa +
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ==
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa *
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb +
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb &&
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa *
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa >
ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc;
llvm-svn: 179049
This combines several related changes:
a) Don't break before after the variable types in for loops with a
single variable.
b) Better indent DeclStmts defining multiple variables.
Before:
bool aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa =
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa),
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb =
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb(bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb);
for (aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaa = aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa;
aaaaaaaaaaa != aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa; ++aaaaaaaaaaa) {
}
After:
bool aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa =
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa),
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb =
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb(bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb);
for (aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaa =
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa;
aaaaaaaaaaa != aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa; ++aaaaaaaaaaa) {
}
llvm-svn: 178641
Basically we have always special-cased the top-level statement of an
unwrapped line (the one with ParenLevel == 0) and that lead to several
inconsistencies. All added tests were formatted in a strange way, for
example:
Before:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa();
if (aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa()) {
}
After:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa();
if (aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa()) {
}
llvm-svn: 178542
Before:
int a; // not formatted
// formatting this line only
After:
int a; // not formatted
// formatting this line only
This makes clang-format stable independent of whether the whole
file or single lines are formatted in most cases.
llvm-svn: 177739
Apparently one needs to set LangOptions.LineComment.
Before "//* */" got reformatted to "/ /* */" as the lexer was returning
the token sequence (slash, comment). This could also lead to weird other
stuff, e.g. for people that like to using comments like:
//****************
llvm-svn: 177720
Summary:
1. When splitting one-line block comment, use indentation and *s.
2. Remove trailing whitespace from all lines of a comment, not only the ones being splitted.
3. Add backslashes for all lines if a comment is used insed a preprocessor directive.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D557
llvm-svn: 177635
Before (when only reformatting "int b"):
int a; // comment
// comment
int b;
After:
int a; // comment
// comment
int b;
This also fixes llvm.org/PR15433.
llvm-svn: 177524
This seems to be generally more desired.
Before:
if (aaaaaaaa &&
bbbbbbbb >
cccccccc) {}
After:
if (aaaaaaaa &&
bbbbbbbb >
cccccccc) {}
Also: Some formatting cleanup on clang-format's files.
llvm-svn: 177514
clang-format already prevented sequences like:
...
SomeParameter).someFunction(
...
as those are quite confusing. This failed on:
...
SomeParameter).someFunction(otherFunction(
...
Fixed in this patch.
llvm-svn: 177157
Summary:
Do this to avoid spoling nicely formatted multi-line comments (e.g.
with code examples or similar stuff).
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D544
llvm-svn: 177153
Summary:
Aligns continuation lines of multi-line comments to the base
indentation level +1:
class A {
/*
* test
*/
void f() {}
};
The first revision is work in progress. The implementation is not yet complete.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D541
llvm-svn: 177080
Before:
A = new SomeType * [Length];
A = new SomeType *[Length]();
After:
A = new SomeType *[Length];
A = new SomeType *[Length]();
Small formatting cleanups with clang-format.
llvm-svn: 176936
1. We now ignore all non-default string literals, including raw
literals.
2. We do not break inside escape sequences any more.
FIXME: We still break in trigraphs.
llvm-svn: 176710
With the cursor located at "I", clang-format would not do anything to:
int a;
I
int b;
With this patch, it reduces the number of empty lines as necessary, and
removes unnecessary whitespace. It does not change/reformat "int a;" or
"int b;".
llvm-svn: 176650
Daniel Jasper