Summary:
When -fsanitize-address-field-padding=1 is present
don't emit memcpy for copy constructor.
Thanks Nico for the extra test case.
Test Plan: regression tests
Reviewers: thakis, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6515
llvm-svn: 223563
Summary: If we've added poisoned paddings to a type do not emit memcpy for operator=.
Test Plan: regression tests.
Reviewers: majnemer, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6160
llvm-svn: 221739
Summary:
When we are adding field paddings for asan even an empty dtor has to remain in the code,
so we ignore -mconstructor-aliases if the paddings are going to be added.
Test Plan: added a test
Reviewers: rsmith, rnk, rafael
Reviewed By: rafael
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6038
llvm-svn: 220986
Summary:
We should avoid a tail padding not only if the last field
has zero size but also if the last field is a struct with a flexible array.
If/when http://reviews.llvm.org/D5478 is committed,
this will also handle the case of structs with zero-sized arrays.
Reviewers: majnemer, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5924
llvm-svn: 220708
Summary:
The general approach is to add extra paddings after every field
in AST/RecordLayoutBuilder.cpp, then add code to CTORs/DTORs that poisons the paddings
(CodeGen/CGClass.cpp).
Everything is done under the flag -fsanitize-address-field-padding.
The blacklist file (-fsanitize-blacklist) allows to avoid the transformation
for given classes or source files.
See also https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/IntraObjectOverflow
Test Plan: run SPEC2006 and some of the Chromium tests with -fsanitize-address-field-padding
Reviewers: samsonov, rnk, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: majnemer, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5687
llvm-svn: 219961
Kostya Serebryany