Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Tim Northover a009a60a91 IR: print value numbers for unnamed function arguments
For consistency with normal instructions and clarity when reading IR,
it's best to print the %0, %1, ... names of function arguments in
definitions.

Also modifies the parser to accept IR in that form for obvious reasons.

llvm-svn: 367755
2019-08-03 14:28:34 +00:00
Alex Bradbury e078967adf [RISCV] Hard float ABI support
The RISC-V hard float calling convention requires the frontend to:

* Detect cases where, once "flattened", a struct can be passed using
int+fp or fp+fp registers under the hard float ABI and coerce to the
appropriate type(s)
* Track usage of GPRs and FPRs in order to gate the above, and to
determine when signext/zeroext attributes must be added to integer
scalars

This patch attempts to do this in compliance with the documented ABI,
and uses ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand in order to do this. @rjmccall, as
author of that code I've tagged you as reviewer for initial feedback on
my usage.

Note that a previous version of the ABI indicated that when passing an
int+fp struct using a GPR+FPR, the int would need to be sign or
zero-extended appropriately. GCC never did this and the ABI was changed,
which makes life easier as ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand can't currently
handle sign/zero-extension attributes.

Re-landed after backing out 366450 due to missed hunks.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60456

llvm-svn: 366480
2019-07-18 18:29:59 +00:00
Alex Bradbury 9b732fe99b Revert "[RISCV] Hard float ABI support" r366450
The commit was missing a few hunks. Will fix and recommit.

llvm-svn: 366454
2019-07-18 16:13:17 +00:00
Alex Bradbury fc3aa2ab48 [RISCV] Hard float ABI support
The RISC-V hard float calling convention requires the frontend to:

* Detect cases where, once "flattened", a struct can be passed using
int+fp or fp+fp registers under the hard float ABI and coerce to the
appropriate type(s) * Track usage of GPRs and FPRs in order to gate the
above, and to
determine when signext/zeroext attributes must be added to integer
scalars

This patch attempts to do this in compliance with the documented ABI,
and uses ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand in order to do this. @rjmccall, as
author of that code I've tagged you as reviewer for initial feedback on
my usage.

Note that a previous version of the ABI indicated that when passing an
int+fp struct using a GPR+FPR, the int would need to be sign or
zero-extended appropriately. GCC never did this and the ABI was changed,
which makes life easier as ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand can't currently
handle sign/zero-extension attributes.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60456

llvm-svn: 366450
2019-07-18 15:33:41 +00:00
Alex Bradbury 91542e14c7 [RISCV] Unbreak test from r357989
There were some errors in the committed test checks, left in due to a git
stash apply mishap.

llvm-svn: 357993
2019-04-09 10:44:47 +00:00
Alex Bradbury c0e8231cdd [RISCV][NFC] Refactor RISC-V ABI lowering tests in preparation for hard float patches
Split tests in to files representing the subset of RISC-V ABIs they should
have identical output for.

llvm-svn: 357989
2019-04-09 10:12:49 +00:00