lvalue-to-rvalue conversion adjusts lvalues of qualified, non-class
type to rvalue expressions of the unqualified variant of that
type. For example, given:
const int i;
(void)(i + 17);
the lvalue-to-rvalue conversion for the subexpression "i" will turn it
from an lvalue expression (a DeclRefExpr) with type 'const int' into
an rvalue expression with type 'int'. Both C and C++ mandate this
conversion, and somehow we've slid through without implementing it.
We now have both DefaultFunctionArrayConversion and
DefaultFunctionArrayLvalueConversion, and which gets used depends on
whether we do the lvalue-to-rvalue conversion or not. Generally, we do
the lvalue-to-rvalue conversion, but there are a few notable
exceptions:
- the left-hand side of a '.' operator
- the left-hand side of an assignment
- a C++ throw expression
- a subscript expression that's subscripting a vector
Making this change exposed two issues with blocks:
- we were deducing const-qualified return types of non-class type
from a block return, which doesn't fit well
- we weren't always setting the known return type of a block when it
was provided with the ^return-type syntax
Fixes the current Clang-on-Clang compile failure and PR6076.
llvm-svn: 95167
stderr if in filetype=obj mode. This is a hack, and will
live until dwarf emission and other random stuff that is
not yet going through MCStreamer is upgraded. It only
impacts filetype=obj mode.
llvm-svn: 95166
$ cat t.ll
@g = global i32 42
$ llc t.ll -o t.o -filetype=obj
$ nm t.o
00000000 D _g
There is still a ton of work left. Instructions are not being encoded
yet apparently.
llvm-svn: 95162
is still deterministic even amongst ambiguous instructions (eventually ambiguous
match orders will be a hard error, but we aren't there yet).
llvm-svn: 95157
It's unclear if the matcher is nondeterminstic of what here,
but I'm getting matches without TAILCALL and some other hosts
are getting matches with it.
llvm-svn: 95149
WHAT!?!
It turns out that Type::isPromotableIntegerType() was not considering
enumeration types to be promotable, so we would never do the
promotion despite having properly computed the promotion type when the
enum was defined. Various operations on values of enum type just
"worked" because we could still compute the integer rank of an enum
type; the oddity, however, is that operations such as "add an enum and
an unsigned" would often have an enum result type (!). The bug
actually showed up as a spurious -Wformat diagnostic
(<rdar://problem/7595366>), but in theory it could cause miscompiles.
In this commit:
- Enum types with a promotion type of "int" or "unsigned int" are
promotable.
- Tweaked the computation of promotable types for enums
- For all of the ABIs, treat enum types the same way as their
underlying types (*not* their promotion types) for argument passing
and return values
- Extend the ABI tester with support for enumeration types
llvm-svn: 95117
Douglas Gregor