template<typename T> struct S { } f() { return 0; }
This case now produces a missing ';' diagnostic, since that seems like a much more likely error than an attempt to declare a function or variable in addition to the class template.
Treat this
llvm-svn: 135195
variants to 'expand'. This changed a couple of public APIs, including
one public type "MacroInstantiation" which is now "MacroExpansion". The
rest of the codebase was updated to reflect this, especially the
libclang code. Two of the C++ (and thus easily changed) libclang APIs
were updated as well because they pertained directly to the old
MacroInstantiation class.
No functionality changed.
llvm-svn: 135139
'expand'. Also update the public API it provides to the new term, and
propagate that update to the various clients.
No functionality changed.
llvm-svn: 135138
When a macro instantiation occurs, reserve a SLocEntry chunk with length the
full length of the macro definition source. Set the spelling location of this chunk
to point to the start of the macro definition and any tokens that are lexed directly
from the macro definition will get a location from this chunk with the appropriate offset.
For any tokens that come from argument expansion, '##' paste operator, etc. have their
instantiation location point at the appropriate place in the instantiated macro definition
(the argument identifier and the '##' token respectively).
This improves macro instantiation diagnostics:
Before:
t.c:5:9: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('struct S' and 'int')
int y = M(/);
^~~~
t.c:5:11: note: instantiated from:
int y = M(/);
^
After:
t.c:5:9: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('struct S' and 'int')
int y = M(/);
^~~~
t.c:3:20: note: instantiated from:
\#define M(op) (foo op 3);
~~~ ^ ~
t.c:5:11: note: instantiated from:
int y = M(/);
^
The memory savings for a candidate boost library that abuses the preprocessor are:
- 32% less SLocEntries (37M -> 25M)
- 30% reduction in PCH file size (900M -> 635M)
- 50% reduction in memory usage for the SLocEntry table (1.6G -> 800M)
llvm-svn: 134587
throw-expressions, such that we don't consider the NRVO when the
non-volatile automatic object comes from outside the innermost try
scope (C++0x [class.copymove]p13). In C++98/03, our ASTs were
incorrect but it didn't matter because IR generation doesn't actually
apply the NRVO here. In C++0x, however, we were moving from an object
when in fact we should have copied from it. Fixes PR10142 /
<rdar://problem/9714312>.
llvm-svn: 134548
Special detail is added for uninitialized variable analysis as this has
serious performance problems than need to be tracked.
Computing some of this data is expensive, for example walking the CFG to
determine its size. To avoid doing that unless the stats data is going
to be used, we thread a bit into the Sema object to track whether
detailed stats should be collected or not. This bit is used to avoid
computations whereever the computations are likely to be more expensive
than checking the state of the flag. Thus, counters are in some cases
unconditionally updated, but the more expensive (and less frequent)
aggregation steps are skipped.
With this patch, we're able to see that for 'gcc.c':
*** Analysis Based Warnings Stats:
232 functions analyzed (0 w/o CFGs).
7151 CFG blocks built.
30 average CFG blocks per function.
1167 max CFG blocks per function.
163 functions analyzed for uninitialiazed variables
640 variables analyzed.
3 average variables per function.
94 max variables per function.
96409 block visits.
591 average block visits per function.
61546 max block visits per function.
And for the reduced testcase in PR10183:
*** Analysis Based Warnings Stats:
98 functions analyzed (0 w/o CFGs).
8526 CFG blocks built.
87 average CFG blocks per function.
7277 max CFG blocks per function.
68 functions analyzed for uninitialiazed variables
1359 variables analyzed.
19 average variables per function.
1196 max variables per function.
2540494 block visits.
37360 average block visits per function.
2536495 max block visits per function.
That last number is the somewhat scary one that indicates the problem in
PR10183.
llvm-svn: 134494
cast type has no ownership specified, implicitly "transfer" the ownership of the cast'ed type
to the cast type:
id x;
(NSString**)&x; // Casting as (__strong NSString**).
llvm-svn: 134275
newly introduced Sema::BuildVectorLiteral.
-Make Sema::ActOnCastExpr handle a vector initializer both when the cast'ed expression
is a ParenListExpr and when it is a ParenExpr.
-Ultimately make Sema::ActOnParenOrParenListExpr independent of what the cast type was.
llvm-svn: 134274
cast type has no ownership specified, implicitly "transfer" the ownership of the cast'ed type
to the cast type:
id x;
static_cast<NSString**>(&x); // Casting as (__strong NSString**).
This currently only works for C++ named casts, C casts to follow.
llvm-svn: 134273
int f(int x) {
if (int foo = f(bar)) {}
return 0;
}
Clang produces the following error messages:
paren_imbalance.cc:2:19: error: use of undeclared identifier 'bar'
if (int foo = f(bar)) {}
^
paren_imbalance.cc:2:26: error: expected ')'
if (int foo = f(bar)) {}
^
paren_imbalance.cc:2:6: note: to match this '('
if (int foo = f(bar)) {}
^
The second error is incorrect. This patch will stop Clang from producing an error on parenthesis imbalance during error recovery when there isn't one.
llvm-svn: 134258
declaration, determine whether the declaration will end up declaring a
function using semantic criteria (e.g., it will have function type)
rather than purely syntactic criteria (e.g., it has the form of a
function declarator). Fixes <rdar://problem/9670557>.
llvm-svn: 133854
lifetime is well-known and restricted, cleaning them up manually is easy to miss and cause a leak.
Use it to plug the leaking of TemplateIdAnnotation objects. rdar://9634138.
llvm-svn: 133610
Language-design credit goes to a lot of people, but I particularly want
to single out Blaine Garst and Patrick Beard for their contributions.
Compiler implementation credit goes to Argyrios, Doug, Fariborz, and myself,
in no particular order.
llvm-svn: 133103
- Move the diagnostic to the case statement instead of at the end of the switch
- Add a fix-it hint as to how to fix the compilation error
llvm-svn: 132903
struct {
typedef int A = 0;
};
According to the C++11 standard, this is not ill-formed, but does not have any ascribed meaning. We can't reasonably accept it, so treat it as ill-formed.
Also switch C++ from an incorrect 'fields can only be initialized in constructors' diagnostic for this case to C's 'illegal initializer (only variables can be initialized)'
llvm-svn: 132890
Related result types apply Cocoa conventions to the type of message
sends and property accesses to Objective-C methods that are known to
always return objects whose type is the same as the type of the
receiving class (or a subclass thereof), such as +alloc and
-init. This tightens up static type safety for Objective-C, so that we
now diagnose mistakes like this:
t.m:4:10: warning: incompatible pointer types initializing 'NSSet *'
with an
expression of type 'NSArray *' [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
NSSet *array = [[NSArray alloc] init];
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/System/Library/Frameworks/Foundation.framework/Headers/NSObject.h:72:1:
note:
instance method 'init' is assumed to return an instance of its
receiver
type ('NSArray *')
- (id)init;
^
It also means that we get decent type inference when writing code in
Objective-C++0x:
auto array = [[NSMutableArray alloc] initWithObjects:@"one", @"two",nil];
// ^ now infers NSMutableArray* rather than id
llvm-svn: 132868
__builtin_astype(): Used to reinterpreted as another data type of the same size using for both scalar and vector data types.
Added test case.
llvm-svn: 132612
type that turns one type into another. This is used as the basis to
implement __underlying_type properly - with TypeSourceInfo and proper
behavior in the face of templates.
llvm-svn: 132017
The general out-of-line case (including explicit instantiation mostly
works except that the definition is being lost somewhere between the AST
and CodeGen, so the definition is never emitted.
llvm-svn: 131933
They are actually grammatically considered definitions and parsed
accordingly.
This fixes the outstanding bugs regarding defaulting functions after
their declarations.
We now really nicely diagnose the following construct (try it!)
int foo() = delete, bar;
Still todo: Defaulted functions other than default constructors
Test cases (including for the above construct)
llvm-svn: 131228
Joerg Sonnenberger