*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
this is a resubmission of r280476. The problem with the original commit was that it was printing
out all numbers as signed, which was wrong for unsigned numbers with the MSB set. Fix that and
add a unit test covering that case.
llvm-svn: 280480
This reverts commit r280476 as it breaks several tests on i386. I was fixing an 32-bit
breakage, and I did not run the 32-bit test suite before submitting, oops.
llvm-svn: 280478
Summary:
It seems the original intention of the function was printing signed values in decimal format, and
unsigned values in hex (without the leading "0x"). However, signed and unsigned long were
exchanged, which lead to amusing test failures in TestMemoryFind.py.
Instead of just switching the two, I think we should just print everything in decimal here, as
the current behaviour is very confusing (especially when one does not request printing of types).
Nothing seems to depend on this behaviour except and we already have a way for the user to
request the format he wants when printing values for most commands (which presumably does not go
through this function).
I also add a unit tests for the function in question.
Reviewers: clayborg, granata.enrico
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24126
llvm-svn: 280476
the test fails for a very prosaic reason: `(const char *)0x1000` returns "4096" on x86_64 and
"1000" (without the "0x") on i386. I haven't tried other 32-bit arches, but I am guessing the
behaviour is the same. XFAIL until someone can get a chance to look at this.
llvm-svn: 280344
Adrian Prantl