This seems to have broken the sanitizer-x86_64-linux buildbot. Reverting until
it's fixed, especially since this landed just before the 5.0 branch.
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308455
and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308441
of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308327
be shared without warnings. Build AttributedTypes to leave breadcrumbs
for tools like the static analyzer. Warn about attempting to use the
attribute with incompatible return types.
llvm-svn: 308092
property and check for incompatible attributes
This commit changes the way ambiguous property synthesis (i.e. when synthesizing
a property that's declared in multiple protocols) is performed. Previously,
Clang synthesized the first property that was found. This lead to problems when
the property was synthesized in a class that conformed to two protocols that
declared that property and a second protocols had a 'readwrite' declaration -
the setter was not synthesized so the class didn't really conform to the second
protocol and user's code would crash at runtime when they would try to set the
property.
This commit ensures that a first readwrite property is selected. This is a
semantic change that changes users code in this manner:
```
@protocol P @property(readonly) int p; @end
@protocol P2 @property(readwrite) id p; @end
@interface I <P2> @end
@implementation I
@syntesize p; // Users previously got a warning here, and Clang synthesized
// readonly 'int p' here. Now Clang synthesizes readwrite 'id' p..
@end
```
To ensure that this change is safe, the warning about incompatible types is
promoted to an error when this kind of readonly/readwrite ambiguity is detected
in the @implementation. This will ensure that previous code that had this subtle
bug and ignored the warning now will fail to compile with an error, and users
should not get suprises at runtime once they resolve the error.
The commit also extends the ambiguity checker, and now it can detect conflicts
among the different property attributes. An error diagnostic is used for
conflicting attributes, to ensure that the user won't get "suprises" at runtime.
ProtocolPropertyMap is removed in favour of a a set + vector because the map's
order of iteration is non-deterministic, so it couldn't be used to select the
readwrite property.
rdar://31579994
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35268
llvm-svn: 307903
Objective-C subscript expressions report errors when a subscript method is not
declared in the base class. However, prior to this commit, qualified id types
were not checked. This commit ensures that an appropriate error is reported
when a subscript method is not declared in any of the protocols that are
included in the qualified id type.
rdar://33213924
llvm-svn: 307642
requirements in protocol/class/category declarations
The unguarded availability warnings in the protocol requirements of a protocol
/class/category declaration can be avoided. This matches the behaviour of
Swift's diagnostics. The warnings for deprecated/unavailable protocols are
preserved.
rdar://33156429
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35061
llvm-svn: 307368
The new compiler warning -Wunguarded-availability-new is a subset of
-Wunguarded-availability. It is on by default. It only warns about uses of APIs
that have been introduced in macOS >= 10.13, iOS >= 11, watchOS >= 4 and
tvOS >= 11. We decided to use this kind of solution as we didn't want to turn
on -Wunguarded-availability by default, because we didn't want our users to get
warnings about uses of old APIs in their existing projects.
rdar://31054725
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34264
llvm-svn: 306033
These diagnostics can't be disabled, and can't actually catch any bugs.
rdar://32427296
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33661
llvm-svn: 304306
This is an initial commit to allow using it with constant expressions, a follow-up commit will enable full support for it in ObjC methods.
llvm-svn: 303712
As discovered by ChenWJ and listed on cfe-dev, the error for Objective C
return type ended up being wrong. This fixes that. Additionally, as a
"while we're there", the other usages of this error and the usage of the
FP above both use a FixItHint, so I'll add it here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32759
llvm-svn: 302720
`__builtin_available`
This commit allows us to use the macOS/iOS/tvOS/watchOS platform names in
`@available`/`__builtin_available`.
rdar://32067795
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33000
llvm-svn: 302540
whose introduced version is lower than the allowed version.
We should just rely on the target version as this introduced version can lead
to false positives (e.g. deprecated declarations).
rdar://31964333
llvm-svn: 302250
for iOS < 9 and OS X < 10.11 X86 targets
This commit adds a new error that disallows methods that have parameters/return
values with a vector type for some older X86 targets. This diagnostic is
needed because objc_msgSend doesn't support SIMD vector registers/return values
on X86 in iOS < 9 and OS X < 10.11. Note that we don't necessarily know if the
vector argument/return value will use a SIMD register, so instead we chose to
be conservative and prohibit all vector types.
rdar://21662309
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28670
llvm-svn: 301532
blocks and lambdas
Prior to this commit Clang emitted the old "partial availability" warning for
expressions that referred to declarations that were not yet introduced in
blocks and lambdas that were not in a function/method. This commit ensures that
top-level blocks and lambdas use the new unguarded availability checks.
rdar://31835952
llvm-svn: 301409
Summary: clang should produce the same errors Objective-C classes that cannot be assigned to weak pointers under both -fobjc-arc and -fobjc-weak. Check for ObjCWeak along with ObjCAutoRefCount when analyzing pointer conversions. Add an -fobjc-weak pass to the existing arc-unavailable-for-weakref test cases to verify the behavior is the same.
Reviewers: rsmith, doug.gregor, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31006
llvm-svn: 299014
Summary: -Warc-repeated-use-of-weak should produce the same warnings with -fobjc-weak as it does with -objc-arc. Also check for ObjCWeak along with ObjCAutoRefCount when recording the use of an evaluated weak variable. Add a -fobjc-weak run to the existing arc-repeated-weak test case and adapt it slightly to work in both modes.
Reviewers: rsmith, doug.gregor, jordan_rose, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: arphaman, rjmccall, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31005
llvm-svn: 299011
Correct class-template deprecation behavior
Based on the comment in the test, and my reading of the standard, a deprecated warning should be issued in the following case:
template<typename T> [[deprecated]] class Foo{}; Foo<int> f;
This was not the case, because the ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl creation did not also copy the deprecated attribute.
Note: I did NOT audit the complete set of attributes to see WHICH ones should be copied, so instead I simply copy ONLY the deprecated attribute.
Previous DiffRev: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27486, was reverted.
This patch fixes the issues brought up here by the reverter: https://reviews.llvm.org/rL298410
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31245
llvm-svn: 298634
that became supported after r297019
The commit r297019 expanded the performSelector ObjC method family heuristic
to ensure that -Wobjc-unsafe-perform-selector covers all performSelector
variations. However, this made the -Warc-performSelector-leaks too noisy, as
that warning produces mostly false positives since the selector is unknown.
This commit reverts the ObjC method family heuristics introduced in r297019.
This ensures that -Warc-performSelector-leaks isn't too noisy. The commit still
preserves the coverage of -Wobjc-unsafe-perform-selector.
rdar://31124629
llvm-svn: 298587
Based on the comment in the test, and my reading of the standard, a deprecated warning should be issued in the following case:
template<typename T> [[deprecated]] class Foo{}; Foo<int> f;
This was not the case, because the ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl creation did not also copy the deprecated attribute.
Note: I did NOT audit the complete set of attributes to see WHICH ones should be copied, so instead I simply copy ONLY the deprecated attribute.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27486
llvm-svn: 298410
The instance method 'self' does not actually return an over-retained object,
so we shouldn't report an error when it's used with 'performSelector'.
rdar://31071620
llvm-svn: 297961
instance of a qualified Class object when that instance method comes from
a protocol that's implemented by NSObject
Instance methods from a root class like NSObject are also class methods because
the metaclass of root class derives from that root class. Therefore, we can
avoid the warning for instances of qualified Class objects that point to classes
that derive from NSObject. Note that we actually don't know if a Class instance
points to a class that derives from NSObject at compile-time, so we have to
make a reasonable assumption that the majority of instances will do so.
rdar://22812517
llvm-svn: 297862
that return record or vector types
The performSelector family of methods from Foundation use objc_msgSend to
dispatch the selector invocations to objects. However, method calls to methods
that return record types might have to use the objc_msgSend_stret as the return
value won't find into the register. This is also supported by this sentence from
performSelector documentation: "The method should not have a significant return
value and should take a single argument of type id, or no arguments". This
commit adds a new warning that warns when a selector which corresponds to a
method that returns a record type is passed into performSelector.
rdar://12056271
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30174
llvm-svn: 297019
Using the constructed name for the class properties with dot syntax may
yield an inappropriate selector (i.e. if it is specified via property
attributes). Prefer the declaration for the selector, falling back to
the constructed name otherwise.
Patch by David Herzka!
llvm-svn: 295683
Turning on the warning by default helps the users as it's a common
mistake to capture out-parameters in a block without ensuring the object
assigned doesn't get released.
rdar://problem/30200058
llvm-svn: 293199
even in the presence of nullability qualifiers.
This commit fixes bugs in r285031 where -Wblock-capture-autoreleasing
wouldn't issue warnings when the function parameters were annotated
with nullability qualifiers. Specifically, look through the sugar and
see if there is an AttributedType of kind attr_objc_ownership to
determine whether __autoreleasing was explicitly specified or implicitly
added by the compiler.
rdar://problem/30193488
llvm-svn: 293194
This change avoids the -Wstrict-prototypes warning for block literals with an
empty argument list or without argument lists.
rdar://15060615
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28296
llvm-svn: 291231
In r267772, we had set the PS4's default dialect for both C and
Objective-C to gnu99. Make that change only for C; we don't really
support Objective-C/C++ so there's no point fiddling the dialect.
llvm-svn: 289625
of a method that was declared in an invalid interface
This commit fixes an infinite loop that occurs when clang tries to iterate over
redeclaration of a method that was declared in an invalid @interface. The
existing validity checks don't catch this as that @interface is a duplicate of
a previously declared valid @interface declaration, so we have to verify that
the found redeclaration is in a valid declaration context.
rdar://29220965
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26664
llvm-svn: 287530
The previous typo correction handling assumed that ivars are only declared in
the interface declaration rather than as a private ivar in the implementation.
Adjust the handling to permit both interfaces. Assert earlier that the
interface has been acquired to ensure that we can identify when both possible
casts have failed.
Addresses PR31040!
llvm-svn: 287238
Since array parameters decay to pointers, '_Nullable' and friends
should be available for use there as well. This is especially
important for parameters that are typedefs of arrays. The unsugared
syntax for this follows the syntax for 'static'-sized arrays in C:
void test(int values[_Nullable]);
This syntax was previously accepted but the '_Nullable' (and any other
attributes) were silently discarded. However, applying '_Nullable' to
a typedef was previously rejected and is now accepted; therefore, it
may be necessary to test for the presence of this feature:
#if __has_feature(nullability_on_arrays)
One important change here is that DecayedTypes don't always
immediately contain PointerTypes anymore; they may contain an
AttributedType instead. This only affected one place in-tree, so I
would guess it's not likely to cause problems elsewhere.
This commit does not change -Wnullability-completeness just yet. I
want to think about whether it's worth doing something special to
avoid breaking existing clients that compile with -Werror. It also
doesn't change '#pragma clang assume_nonnull' behavior, which
currently treats the following two declarations as equivalent:
#pragma clang assume_nonnull begin
void test(void *pointers[]);
#pragma clang assume_nonnull end
void test(void * _Nonnull pointers[]);
This is not the desired behavior, but changing it would break
backwards-compatibility. Most likely the best answer is going to be
adding a new warning.
Part of rdar://problem/25846421
llvm-svn: 286519
Expose a warning flag for warn_duplicate_protocol_def. This allows control
over the severity of duplicate protocol definitions.
For example -Werror=duplicate-protocol or
#pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Wduplicate-protocol".
Patch provided by Dave Lee!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26406
llvm-svn: 286487
Hans Wennborg