In running some internal vectorcall tests in 32 bit mode, we discovered that the
behavior I'd previously implemented for x64 (and applied to x32) regarding the
assignment of SSE registers was incorrect. See spec here:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn375768.aspx
My previous implementation applied register argument position from the x64
version to both. This isn't correct for x86, so this removes and refactors that
section. Additionally, it corrects the integer/int-pointer assignments. Unlike
x64, x86 permits integers to be assigned independent of position.
Finally, the code for 32 bit was cleaned up a little to clarify the intent,
as well as given a descriptive comment.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34455
llvm-svn: 305928
Front end component (back end changes are D27392). The vectorcall
calling convention was broken subtly in two cases. First,
it didn't properly handle homogeneous vector aggregates (HVAs).
Second, the vectorcall specification requires that only the
first 6 parameters be eligible for register assignment.
This patch fixes both issues.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27529
llvm-svn: 291041
Before this change, we would pass all non-HFA record arguments on
Windows with byval. Byval often blocks optimizations and results in bad
code generation. Windows now uses the existing workaround that other
x86_32 platforms use.
I also expanded the workaround to handle C++ records with constructors
on Windows. On non-Windows platforms, we have to keep generating the
same LLVM IR prototypes if we want our bitcode to be ABI compatible.
Otherwise we will encounter mismatch issues like PR21573.
Essentially fixes PR27522 in Clang instead of LLVM.
Reviewers: hans
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19756
llvm-svn: 268261
Introduce an Address type to bundle a pointer value with an
alignment. Introduce APIs on CGBuilderTy to work with Address
values. Change core APIs on CGF/CGM to traffic in Address where
appropriate. Require alignments to be non-zero. Update a ton
of code to compute and propagate alignment information.
As part of this, I've promoted CGBuiltin's EmitPointerWithAlignment
helper function to CGF and made use of it in a number of places in
the expression emitter.
The end result is that we should now be significantly more correct
when performing operations on objects that are locally known to
be under-aligned. Since alignment is not reliably tracked in the
type system, there are inherent limits to this, but at least we
are no longer confused by standard operations like derived-to-base
conversions and array-to-pointer decay. I've also fixed a large
number of bugs where we were applying the complete-object alignment
to a pointer instead of the non-virtual alignment, although most of
these were hidden by the very conservative approach we took with
member alignment.
Also, because IRGen now reliably asserts on zero alignments, we
should no longer be subject to an absurd but frustrating recurring
bug where an incomplete type would report a zero alignment and then
we'd naively do a alignmentAtOffset on it and emit code using an
alignment equal to the largest power-of-two factor of the offset.
We should also now be emitting much more aggressive alignment
attributes in the presence of over-alignment. In particular,
field access now uses alignmentAtOffset instead of min.
Several times in this patch, I had to change the existing
code-generation pattern in order to more effectively use
the Address APIs. For the most part, this seems to be a strict
improvement, like doing pointer arithmetic with GEPs instead of
ptrtoint. That said, I've tried very hard to not change semantics,
but it is likely that I've failed in a few places, for which I
apologize.
ABIArgInfo now always carries the assumed alignment of indirect and
indirect byval arguments. In order to cut down on what was already
a dauntingly large patch, I changed the code to never set align
attributes in the IR on non-byval indirect arguments. That is,
we still generate code which assumes that indirect arguments have
the given alignment, but we don't express this information to the
backend except where it's semantically required (i.e. on byvals).
This is likely a minor regression for those targets that did provide
this information, but it'll be trivial to add it back in a later
patch.
I partially punted on applying this work to CGBuiltin. Please
do not add more uses of the CreateDefaultAligned{Load,Store}
APIs; they will be going away eventually.
llvm-svn: 246985
The most complex aspect of the convention is the handling of homogeneous
vector and floating point aggregates. Reuse the homogeneous aggregate
classification code that we use on PPC64 and ARM for this.
This convention also has a C mangling, and we apparently implement that
in both Clang and LLVM.
Reviewed By: majnemer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6063
llvm-svn: 221006
Erich Keane