declarations as referenced when in fact we're not going to even form
a call in the AST. This is significant because we attempt to allow as an
extension classes with intentionally private and undefined copy
constructors to have temporaries bound to references, and so shouldn't
warn about the lack of definition for that copy constructor when the
class is internal.
Doug, John wasn't really satisfied with the presence of overloading at
all. This is a stop-gap and there may be a better solution. If you can
give me some hints for how you'd prefer to see this solved, I'll happily
switch things over.
llvm-svn: 126480
initializers just because they don't have a proper out-of-line definition.
Such code is technically ill-formed but is too common and too unlikely to be
a problem to be seriously worth worrying about.
llvm-svn: 126137
without defining them. This should be an error, but I'm paranoid about
"uses" that end up not actually requiring a definition. I'll revisit later.
Also, teach IR generation to not set internal linkage on variable
declarations, just for safety's sake. Doing so produces an invalid module
if the variable is not ultimately defined.
Also, fix several places in the test suite where we were using internal
functions without definitions.
llvm-svn: 126016
Chandler Carruth