This patch implements PR#22821.
Taking the address of a packed member is dangerous since the reduced
alignment of the pointee is lost. This can lead to memory alignment
faults in some architectures if the pointer value is dereferenced.
This change adds a new warning to clang emitted when taking the address
of a packed member. A packed member is either a field/data member
declared as attribute((packed)) or belonging to a struct/class
declared as such. The associated flag is -Waddress-of-packed-member.
Conversions (either implicit or via a valid casting) to pointer types
with lower or equal alignment requirements (e.g. void* or char*)
silence the warning.
This change also adds a new error diagnostic when the user attempts to
bind a reference to a packed member, regardless of the alignment.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20561
llvm-svn: 275417
- Changes diagnostics for Blocks to be implicitly
const qualified OpenCL v2.0 s6.12.5.
- Added and unified diagnostics of some OpenCL special types:
blocks, images, samplers, pipes. These types are intended for use
with the OpenCL builtin functions only and, therefore, most regular
uses are not allowed including assignments, arithmetic operations,
pointer dereferencing, etc.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21989
llvm-svn: 275061
Before r266366, clang used to support constructs like:
typedef __attribute__((vector_size(8))) double float64x1_t;
typedef __attribute__((vector_size(16))) double float64x2_t;
float64x1_t vget_low_f64(float64x2_t __p0);
double y = 3.0 + vget_low_f64(v);
But it would reject:
double y = vget_low_f64(v) + 3.0;
It also always rejected assignments:
double y = vget_low_f64(v);
This patch: (a) revivies the behavior of `3.0 + vget_low_f64(v)` prior to
r266366, (b) add support for `vget_low_f64(v) + 3.0` and (c) add support for
assignments.
These vector semantics have never really been tied up but it seems
odd that we used to support some binop froms but do not support
assignment. If we did support scalar for the purposes of arithmetic, we
should probably be able to reinterpret as scalar for the purposes of
assignment too.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21700
rdar://problem/26093791
llvm-svn: 274646
When we have template arguments, we have a function and a pattern, the variable
in init-capture belongs to the pattern decl when checking if the lhs of
"max = current" is modifiable:
auto find = [max = init](auto current) {
max = current;
};
In function isReferenceToNonConstCapture, we handle the case where the decl
context for the variable is not part of the current context.
Instead of crashing, we emit an error message:
cannot assign to a variable captured by copy in a non-mutable lambda
rdar://26997922
llvm-svn: 274392
constructor would be; this is effectively required by P0136R1. This has the
effect of exposing the validity of the base class initialization steps to
SFINAE checks.
llvm-svn: 274088
Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into
C++ last year as a DR against C++11.
Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited
base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to
constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for
using-declarations.
For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived
class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow
constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the
actual initialization, and have a new expression node,
CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such
a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect
forwarding of arguments.)
In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls,
variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting
constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code
into the caller of the inherited constructor.
Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some
corner cases. In particular:
* if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to
construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B
befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and
* if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default
constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from
a base class
llvm-svn: 274049
-Wfor-loop-analysis warnings for a for-loop with a condition variable. In such
a case, the loop condition variable is modified on each iteration of the loop
by definition.
Original commit message:
Rearrange condition handling so that semantic checks on a condition variable
are performed before the other substatements of the construct are parsed,
rather than deferring them until the end. This allows better error recovery
from semantic errors in the condition, improves diagnostic order, and is a
prerequisite for C++17 constexpr if.
llvm-svn: 273600
are performed before the other substatements of the construct are parsed,
rather than deferring them until the end. This allows better error recovery
from semantic errors in the condition, improves diagnostic order, and is a
prerequisite for C++17 constexpr if.
llvm-svn: 273548
classes.
MSVC actively uses unqualified lookup in dependent bases, lookup at the
instantiation point (non-dependent names may be resolved on things
declared later) etc. and all this stuff is the main cause of
incompatibility between clang and MSVC.
Clang tries to emulate MSVC behavior but it may fail in many cases.
clang could store lexed tokens for member functions definitions within
ClassTemplateDecl for later parsing during template instantiation.
It will allow resolving many possible issues with lookup in dependent
base classes and removing many already existing MSVC-specific
hacks/workarounds from the clang code.
llvm-svn: 272774
If definition of default function argument uses itself, clang crashed,
because corresponding function parameter is not associated with the default
argument yet. With this fix clang emits appropriate error message.
This change fixes PR28105.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21301
llvm-svn: 272623
This patch implements PR#22821.
Taking the address of a packed member is dangerous since the reduced
alignment of the pointee is lost. This can lead to memory alignment
faults in some architectures if the pointer value is dereferenced.
This change adds a new warning to clang emitted when taking the address
of a packed member. A packed member is either a field/data member
declared as attribute((packed)) or belonging to a struct/class
declared as such. The associated flag is -Waddress-of-packed-member
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20561
llvm-svn: 272552
These ExprWithCleanups are added for holding a RunCleanupsScope not
for destructor calls; rather, they are for lifetime marks. This requires
ExprWithCleanups to keep a bit to indicate whether it have cleanups with
side effects (e.g. dtor calls).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20498
llvm-svn: 272296
Given the following C++:
```
void foo();
void foo() __attribute__((enable_if(false, "")));
bool bar() {
auto P = foo;
return P == foo;
}
```
We'll currently happily (and correctly) resolve `foo` to the `foo`
overload without `enable_if` when assigning to `P`. However, we'll
complain about an ambiguous overload on the `P == foo` line, because
`Sema::CheckPlaceholderExpr` doesn't recognize that there's only one
`foo` that could possibly work here.
This patch teaches `Sema::CheckPlaceholderExpr` how to properly deal
with such cases.
Grepping for other callers of things like
`Sema::ResolveAndFixSingleFunctionTemplateSpecialization`, it *looks*
like this is the last place that needed to be fixed up. If I'm wrong,
I'll see if there's something we can do that beats what amounts to
whack-a-mole with bugs.
llvm-svn: 272080
For better performance and to unify code with offloading part we pass
scalar firstprivate values by value, instead of by reference. It will
remove some extra copying operations.
llvm-svn: 269751
This patch implements __unaligned (MS extension) as a proper type qualifier
(before that, it was implemented as an ignored attribute).
It also fixes PR27367 and PR27666.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20103
llvm-svn: 269220
This patch corresponds to reviews:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15120http://reviews.llvm.org/D19125
It adds support for the __float128 keyword, literals and target feature to
enable it. Based on the latter of the two aforementioned reviews, this feature
is enabled on Linux on i386/X86 as well as SystemZ.
This is also the second attempt in commiting this feature. The first attempt
did not enable it on required platforms which caused failures when compiling
type_traits with -std=gnu++11.
If you see failures with compiling this header on your platform after this
commit, it is likely that your platform needs to have this feature enabled.
llvm-svn: 268898
If the address of a field is taken as a pointer to member, we should
not warn that the field is not used.
Normaly, yse of fields are done from MemberExpr, but in case of pointer to
member, it is in a DeclRefExpr
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20054
llvm-svn: 268895
This patch implements __unaligned (MS extension) as a proper type qualifier
(before that, it was implemented as an ignored attribute).
It also fixes PR27367.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19654
llvm-svn: 268727
declared before it is used. Because we don't use normal name lookup to find
these, the normal code to filter out non-visible names from name lookup results
does not apply.
llvm-svn: 268585
Usually these parameters are used solely to initialize the field in the
initializer list, and there is no real shadowing confusion.
There is a new warning under -Wshadow called
-Wshadow-field-in-constructor-modified. It attempts to find
modifications of such constructor parameters that probably intended to
modify the field.
It has some false negatives, though, so there is another warning group,
-Wshadow-field-in-constructor, which always warns on this special case.
For users who just want the old behavior and don't care about these fine
grained groups, we have a new warning group called -Wshadow-all that
activates everything.
Fixes PR16088.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18271
llvm-svn: 267957
The Decl::isUsed has a value for every decl. In non-module builds it is very
difficult (but possible) to break this invariant but when we walk up the redecl
chain we find the neccessary information.
When deserializing the decls from a module it is much more difficult to update
correctly this invariant. The patch centralizes the information whether a decl
is used in the canonical decl marking the entire entity as being used.
Fixes https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27401
Patch by Cristina Cristescu and me.
Thanks to Richard Smith who helped to debug and understand the issue!
Reviewed by Richard Smith.
llvm-svn: 267691
Since this patch provided support for the __float128 type but disabled it
on all platforms by default, some platforms can't compile type_traits with
-std=gnu++11 since there is a specialization with __float128.
This reverts the patch until D19125 is approved (i.e. we know which platforms
need this support enabled).
llvm-svn: 266460
This patch implements __unaligned as a type qualifier; before that, it was
modeled as an attribute. Proper mangling of __unaligned is implemented as well.
Some OpenCL code/tests are tangenially affected, as they relied on existing
number and sizes of type qualifiers.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18596
llvm-svn: 266415
This patch corresponds to review:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15120
It adds support for the __float128 keyword, literals and a target feature to
enable it. This support is disabled by default on all targets and any target
that has support for this type is free to add it.
Based on feedback that I've received from target maintainers, this appears to
be the right thing for most targets. I have not heard from the maintainers of
X86 which I believe supports this type. I will subsequently investigate the
impact of enabling this on X86.
llvm-svn: 266186
Putting OpenCLImageTypes.def to clangAST library violates layering requirement: "It's not OK for a Basic/ header to include an AST/ header".
This fixes the modules build.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18954
Reviewers: Richard Smith, Vassil Vassilev.
llvm-svn: 266180
I. Current implementation of images is not conformant to spec in the following points:
1. It makes no distinction with respect to access qualifiers and therefore allows to use images with different access type interchangeably. The following code would compile just fine:
void write_image(write_only image2d_t img);
kernel void foo(read_only image2d_t img) { write_image(img); } // Accepted code
which is disallowed according to s6.13.14.
2. It discards access qualifier on generated code, which leads to generated code for the above example:
call void @write_image(%opencl.image2d_t* %img);
In OpenCL2.0 however we can have different calls into write_image with read_only and wite_only images.
Also generally following compiler steps have no easy way to take different path depending on the image access: linking to the right implementation of image types, performing IR opts and backend codegen differently.
3. Image types are language keywords and can't be redeclared s6.1.9, which can happen currently as they are just typedef names.
4. Default access qualifier read_only is to be added if not provided explicitly.
II. This patch corrects the above points as follows:
1. All images are encapsulated into a separate .def file that is inserted in different points where image handling is required. This avoid a lot of code repetition as all images are handled the same way in the code with no distinction of their exact type.
2. The Cartesian product of image types and image access qualifiers is added to the builtin types. This simplifies a lot handling of access type mismatch as no operations are allowed by default on distinct Builtin types. Also spec intended access qualifier as special type qualifier that are combined with an image type to form a distinct type (see statement above - images can't be created w/o access qualifiers).
3. Improves testing of images in Clang.
Author: Anastasia Stulova
Reviewers: bader, mgrang.
Subscribers: pxli168, pekka.jaaskelainen, yaxunl.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17821
llvm-svn: 265783
Add parsing, sema analysis for 'declare target' construct for OpenMP 4.0
(4.5 support will be added in separate patch).
The declare target directive specifies that variables, functions (C, C++
and Fortran), and subroutines (Fortran) are mapped to a device. The declare
target directive is a declarative directive. In Clang declare target is
implemented as implicit attribute for the declaration.
The syntax of the declare target directive is as follows:
#pragma omp declare target
declarations-definition-seq
#pragma omp end declare target
Based on patch from Michael Wong http://reviews.llvm.org/D15321
llvm-svn: 265530
In some cases, when we encounter a direct function call with an
incorrect number of arguments, we'll emit a diagnostic, and pretend that
the call to the function was valid. For example, in C:
int foo();
int a = foo(1);
Prior to this patch, we'd get an ICE if foo had an enable_if attribute,
because CheckEnableIf assumes that the number of arguments it gets
passed is valid for the function it's passed. Now, we check that the
number of args looks valid prior to checking enable_if conditions.
This fix was not done inside of CheckEnableIf because the problem
presently can only occur in one caller of CheckEnableIf (ActOnCallExpr).
Additionally, checking inside of CheckEnableIf would make us emit
multiple diagnostics for the same error (one "enable_if failed", one
"you gave this function the wrong number of arguments"), which seems
worse than just complaining about the latter.
llvm-svn: 264975
use. In order for this to fire, the function needed to be a templated function
marked 'constexpr' and declared but not defined. This weird pattern appears in
libstdc++'s alloc_traits.h.
llvm-svn: 264471
Implement lambda capture of *this by copy.
For e.g.:
struct A {
int d = 10;
auto foo() { return [*this] (auto a) mutable { d+=a; return d; }; }
};
auto L = A{}.foo(); // A{}'s lifetime is gone.
// Below is still ok, because *this was captured by value.
assert(L(10) == 20);
assert(L(100) == 120);
If the capture was implicit, or [this] (i.e. *this was captured by reference), this code would be otherwise undefined.
Implementation Strategy:
- amend the parser to accept *this in the lambda introducer
- add a new king of capture LCK_StarThis
- teach Sema::CheckCXXThisCapture to handle by copy captures of the
enclosing object (i.e. *this)
- when CheckCXXThisCapture does capture by copy, the corresponding
initializer expression for the closure's data member
direct-initializes it thus making a copy of '*this'.
- in codegen, when assigning to CXXThisValue, if *this was captured by
copy, make sure it points to the corresponding field member, and
not, unlike when captured by reference, what the field member points
to.
- mark feature as implemented in svn
Much gratitude to Richard Smith for his carefully illuminating reviews!
llvm-svn: 263921
Given the following test case:
typedef struct {
const char *name;
id field;
} Test9;
extern void doSomething(Test9 arg);
void test9() {
Test9 foo2 = {0, 0};
doSomething(foo2);
}
With a release compiler, we don't emit any message and silently ignore the
variable "foo2". With an assert compiler, we get an assertion failure.
The root cause —————————————
Back in r140457 we gave InitListChecker a verification-only mode, and will use
CanUseDecl instead of DiagnoseUseOfDecl for verification-only mode.
These two functions handle unavailable issues differently:
In Sema::CanUseDecl, we say the decl is invalid when the Decl is unavailable and
the current context is available.
In Sema::DiagnoseUseOfDecl, we say the decl is usable by ignoring the return
code of DiagnoseAvailabilityOfDecl
So with an assert build, we will hit an assertion in diagnoseListInit
assert(DiagnoseInitList.HadError() &&
"Inconsistent init list check result.");
The fix -------------------
If we follow what is implemented in CanUseDecl and treat Decls with
unavailable issues as invalid, the variable decl of “foo2” will be marked as
invalid. Since unavailable checking is processed in delayed diagnostics
(r197627), we will silently ignore the diagnostics when we find out that
the variable decl is invalid.
We add a flag "TreatUnavailableAsInvalid" for the verification-only mode.
For overload resolution, we want to say decls with unavailable issues are
invalid; but for everything else, we should say they are valid and
emit diagnostics. Depending on the value of the flag, CanUseDecl
can return different values for unavailable issues.
rdar://23557300
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15314
llvm-svn: 263149
Roger Ferrer Ibanez