This test has been failing on some SDKs for a long time because we lack
a proper way of identifying the SDK version in Lit. Until that is possible,
mark the test as unsupported on Apple to restore the CI.
Since <unwind.h> is in the SDK, not in /usr/include, the XFAILs must
be predicated on the compiler version (ideally even on the SDK version)
instead of the target system version.
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.
This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
Instead of having different names for the same Lit feature accross code
bases, use the same name everywhere. This NFC commit is in preparation
for a refactor where all three projects will be using the same Lit
feature detection logic, and hence it won't be convenient to use
different names for the feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78370
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
This test fails on ARM bare-metal targets because it assumes the Itanium ABI,
whereas EHABI requires the exception address to be 8-byte aligned.
I was a bit puzzled at first because this should've failed on the public
arm-linux builder too. I think the reason it passes there is because we don't
include libunwind headers in the include path when running the libcxxabi tests,
so the system unwind.h gets picked up.
Reviewers: rengolin, EricWF
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31178
llvm-svn: 299435
Summary:
In 32 bit builds on a 64 bit system `std::malloc` does not return correctly aligned memory. This leads to undefined behavior.
This patch switches to using `posix_memalign` to allocate correctly aligned memory instead.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, danalbert, jroelofs, compnerd
Reviewed By: compnerd
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25417
llvm-svn: 296952
Louis Dionne