- We should report bugs to the GitHub Issues
- We should advocate using Discourse instead of the superseded cfe-dev
mailing list.
There are a couple of other cosmetic changes such as preferring `using`
instead of `typedef` and quoting the `-analyze-function` parameter's
payload for escaping the braces.
Thanks @loic-joly-sonarsource for reporting this on Discord!
Reviewed By: NoQ, Szelethus
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119245
D116208 may cause a macro clash on older versions of linux, where
fs.h defines a READ macro. This is resolved by switching to a more
typical casing style for non-macro symbols.
Reapplying with changes to the symbol names in various platform
specific code, which I missed previously.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118783
ISO_Fortran_binding.h was updated with missing entries for CFI
types for REAL and COMPLEX kinds 2,3,10,16. This patch updates TypeCode.h
to use these new types.
This patch is part of the upstreaming effort from fir-dev branch.
Reviewed By: jeanPerier
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119283
Previous test in ppc-pmmintrin.c did not check IR of intrinsic function
definition. Add them and simplify.
These tests shouldn't be auto-generated, because we don't want to check
wrapper functions.
clang-cl MSVC required version is 19.20 now. Update the default
-fms-compatibility-version to 19.14.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114639
This patch fixes two issues with clearing of the internal storage for cl::bits
1. The internal bits storage for cl::bits is uninitialized. This is a problem if a cl::bits option is not defined with static lifetime.
2. ResetAllOptionOccurrences does not reset cl::bits options.
The latter is also discussed in:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-February/148299.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119066
D116208 may cause a macro clash on older versions of linux, where
fs.h defines a READ macro. This is resolved by switching to a more
typical casing style for non-macro symbols.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118783
I suspect that this is dead code. There is no test coverage for
this special case, and the struct type names this checks against
don't seem to match what OpenCL actually generates (which would be
%opencl.sampler_t rather than %struct._sampler_t for example).
Motivation for this change is that this code is incompatible with
opaque pointers -- simply deleting it is the simplest way of
making it compatible :)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119229
This patch adds support for generating MLIR files in Flang's frontend
driver (i.e. `flang-new -fc1`). `-emit-fir` is added as an alias for
`-emit-mlir`. We may want to decide to split the two in the future.
A new parent class for code-gen frontend actions is introduced:
`CodeGenAction`. We will be using this class to encapsulate logic shared
between all code-generation actions, but not required otherwise. For
now, it will:
* run prescanning, parsing and semantic checks,
* lower the input to MLIR.
`EmitObjAction` is updated to inherit from this class. This means that
the behaviour of `flang-new -fc1 -emit-obj` is also updated (previously,
it would just exit immediately). This change required
`flang/test/Driver/syntax-only.f90` to be updated.
For `-emit-fir`, a specialisation of `CodeGenAction` is introduced:
`EmitMLIRAction`. The key logic for this class is implemented in
`EmitMLIRAction::ExecuteAction`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118985
This rewrites ArgPromotion to be based on offsets rather than GEP
structure. We inspect all loads at constant offsets and remember
which types are loaded at which offsets. Then we promote based on
those types.
This generalizes ArgPromotion to work with bitcasted loads, and
is compatible with opaque pointers.
This patch also fixes incorrect handling of alignment during
argument promotion. Previously, the implementation only checked
that the pointer is dereferenceable, but was happy to speculate
overaligned loads. (I would have fixed this separately in advance,
but I found this hard to do with the previous implementation
approach).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118685
Previously, when calling a procedure implicitly for which a global scope
procedure symbol with the same name existed, semantics resolved the
procedure name in the call to the global symbol without checking that
the symbol interface was compatible with the implicit interface of the
call.
This could cause expression rewrite and lowering to later badly process
the implicit call assuming a different result type or an explicit
interface. This could lead to lowering crash in case the actual argument
were incompatible with the dummies from the explicit interface.
Emit errors in the following problematic cases:
- If the result type from the symbol did not match the one from the
implicit interface.
- If the symbol requires an explicit interface.
This patch still allows calling an F77 like procedure with different
actual argument types than the one it was defined with because it is
correctly supported in lowering and is a feature in some program
(it is a pointer cast). The two cases that won't be accepted have
little chance to make much sense. Results returning ABIs may differ
depending on the return types, and function that requires explicit
interface usually requires descriptors or specific processing that
is incompatible with implicit interfaces.
Note that this patch is not making a deep analysis, and it will only
catch mistakes if a global symbol and an implicit interface are
involved. Cases where the user provided a conflicting explicit
interface would still require a pass after name resolution to study
conflicts more deeply. But these cases will not crash lowering or
trigger expression rewrite to do weird things.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119274
As reported in Issue #41838, `clang` doesn't correctly implement `long
double` on 32-bit Solaris/SPARC: the psABI requires this to be an 128-bit
type. Four sanitizer tests currently `FAIL` for this reason.
While there is a WIP patch to fix `clang` (D89130
<https://reviews.llvm.org/D89130>), it isn't complete yet and I've hit so
many brick walls while trying to finish it that I'm unsure if I ever will.
This patch therefore `XFAIL`s those tests in the meantime.
Tested on `sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119016
Enabling `sanitizer_common` tests on Solaris (D91606
<https://reviews.llvm.org/D91606>) and SPARC (D91608
<https://reviews.llvm.org/D91608>) uncovered a sparcv9 failure
SanitizerCommon-Unit :: ./Sanitizer-sparcv9-Test/CompactRingBuffer.int64
like this:
[ RUN ] CompactRingBuffer.int64
==24576==ERROR: SanitizerTool failed to deallocate 0x2000 (8192) bytes at address 0xffffffff7f59b000
==24576==Sanitizer CHECK failed: /vol/llvm/src/llvm-project/local/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_posix.cpp:61 (("unable to unmap" && 0)) != (0) (0, 0)
The problem is that the original allocation via
`MmapAlignedOrDieOnFatalError` is for 4 kB, but the Solaris/sparcv9
pagesize is 8 kB. So the initial allocation is for 12 kB, rounded to a
multiple of the pagesize. Afterwards, the unneeded rest is unmapped again,
but this fails since the address is not pagesize-aligned.
This patch avoids this by aligning the end of the mapping to the pagesize.
With D91827 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D91827> added, the test `PASS`es on
`sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91615
As described in Issue #53523, the
`DenseMapCustomTest.DefaultMinReservedSizeTest` test FAILs on Solaris/SPARC
(both 32 and 64-bit):
/vol/llvm/src/llvm-project/local/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/tests/sanitizer_dense_map_test.cpp:399:
Failure
Expected: (MemorySize) != (Map.getMemorySize()), actual: 8192 vs 8192
This happens because SPARC, unlike many other CPUs, uses an 8 kB pagesize.
Fixed by incorporating the pagesize into the calculations of
`ExpectedInitialBucketCount` and derived values.
Tested on `sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11`, `amd64-pc-solaris2.11`, and
`x86_64-pc-linux-gnu`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118771
This patch makes llvm-rc/windres prefer <target>-clang over
clang when doing it's preprocessing. This is so that we can
have a .cfg file for <target> and configure sysroot and other
important flags.
Config files not picked up with clang --target=<target>
automatically.
We only look for <target>-clang in the same dir as llvm-windres
and not for all PATHs to minimize the change.
Reviewed By: mstorsjo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119219
This patch drops TableGen patterns matching all-ones masked RVV pseudos
in the case where there are fallback patterns matching the generic
masked forms to "_MASK" pseudos. This optimization is now performed with
a SelectionDAG post-processing step which peephole-optimizes these same
pseudos with all-ones masks and swaps them out to their unmasked
pseudos.
This cuts our generated ISel table down by around ~5% (~110kB) in lieu
of a far smaller auto-generated table to help with the peephole.
This only targets our custom RISCVISD::*_VL binary operator nodes, which
use the one form for both masked and unmasked variants. A similar
approach could be used for our intrinsics but we'd need to do some work,
e.g., to represent unmasked intrinsics as true-masked intrinsics at the
IR or ISel level. At a rough estimate, this could save us a further 9%
on the size of our ISel table for the binary intrinsic patterns alone.
There is no observable impact on our tests.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118810
OpenMP Spec 5.2 requires unimplemented requires clauses to produce
compile time error termination. Moving current partial support of
reverse_offload to a distant future version 9.9 so that existing
code can be tested and maintained until a complete implementation
is available.
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119256
code object version determines ABI, therefore should not be mixed.
This patch emits amdgpu_code_object_version module flag in LLVM IR
based on code object version (default 4).
The amdgpu_code_object_version value is code object version times 100.
LLVM IR with different amdgpu_code_object_version module flag cannot
be linked.
The -cc1 option -mcode-object-version=none is for ROCm device library use
only, which supports multiple ABI.
Reviewed by: Artem Belevich
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119026
1. Remove computeDefaultABIFromArch and add computeDefaultABI in
RISCVISAInfo.
2. Add parseFeatureBits which may used in D118333.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119250
The "-fzero-call-used-regs" option tells the compiler to zero out
certain registers before the function returns. It's also available as a
function attribute: zero_call_used_regs.
The two upper categories are:
- "used": Zero out used registers.
- "all": Zero out all registers, whether used or not.
The individual options are:
- "skip": Don't zero out any registers. This is the default.
- "used": Zero out all used registers.
- "used-arg": Zero out used registers that are used for arguments.
- "used-gpr": Zero out used registers that are GPRs.
- "used-gpr-arg": Zero out used GPRs that are used as arguments.
- "all": Zero out all registers.
- "all-arg": Zero out all registers used for arguments.
- "all-gpr": Zero out all GPRs.
- "all-gpr-arg": Zero out all GPRs used for arguments.
This is used to help mitigate Return-Oriented Programming exploits.
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110869
Removing caching of ranges/abbrevs to simplify the code.
Before we were doing it to get around a gdb limitation.
FBD34015613
Reviewed By: Amir, maksfb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119276
Some globals lower to literal addresses on AMDGPU.
This may be wrong for non-integral address spaces. I'm wondering if we
should just allow regular G_ADD to use pointer types, and reserve
G_PTR_ADD for non-integral address spaces.
This fixes the issue raised in https://reviews.llvm.org/D108850#3303452
Before C++17, the function object is evaluated in a unspecified order. In the following example: https://godbolt.org/z/8ao4vdsr7 the function object is either evaluated before or after the arguments, depending on the compiler. With MSVC and /std:c++14 the function object is evaluated after the arguments; with clang and gcc, it is evaluated before. With C++17, the function object is guaranteed to be evaluated before the arguments, see: https://riptutorial.com/cplusplus/example/19369/evaluation-order-of-function-arguments
In our case, the issue was that the `args` conversion to `ArrayRef` was evaluated before the lambda call `link`, which internally was calling `parseFlavor()`, which in turned modified `args`. We ended with an `ArrayRef` argument that reflected the previous contents of `args`.
Add coverage for `-flavor` which we didn't have before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119278
Remove mentions of `experimental::function`, its operators, etc. They are no
longer in `experimental/functional`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119204
The ContainingSegment variable is only used to check whether we found
the address at this time. When building without Asserts this emits a
warning. So for now wrap this code in LLVM_DEBUG to avoid the warning.
Supports whitespace elements: ` ` and `\\n` as well as the "empty" whitespace `` that removes an otherwise printed space.
Depends on D118208
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118210
This will do the combine in cases that should fold, but don't
now. e.g. we're relying on the CSEMIRBuilder's incomplete constant
folding. For instance it doesn't handle FP operations or vectors (and
we don't have separate constant folding combines either to catch
them).
This adds a --build-id=<hex build ID> flag to llvm-symbolizer. If --obj
is unspecified, this will attempt to look up the provided build ID using
whatever mechanisms are available to the Symbolizer (typically,
debuginfod). The semantics are then as if the found binary were given
using the --obj flag.
Reviewed By: jhenderson, phosek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118633
Roman Lebedev