Summary: This is updating the OpenMP status table. Cray has volunteered for `defaultmap` and supporting `in_reduction` on the `target` construct, so the status on those entries from was changed from "unclaimed". Also, a new entry was added for supporting non-contiguous arrays sections on the `target update` directive.
Reviewers: ABataev, hfinkel, jdoerfert, kkwli0
Reviewed By: ABataev
Subscribers: guansong, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69923
Add options to control floating point behavior: trapping and
exception behavior, rounding, and control of optimizations that affect
floating point calculations. More details in UsersManual.rst.
Reviewers: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62731
Summary:
a change {D67541} cause LanguageStandard to now be subtly different from all other clang-format options, in that the Enum value (less the prefix) is not always allowed as valid as the configuration option.
This caused the ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst and the Format.h to diverge so that the ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst could no longer be generated from the Format.h using dump_format_stlye.py
This fix tried to remedy that:
1) by allowing an additional comment (in Format.h) after the enum to be used as the `in configuration ( XXXX )` text, and changing the dump_format_style.py to support that.
This makes the following code:
```
enum {
...
LS_Cpp03, // c++03
LS_Cpp11, // c++11
...
};
```
would render as:
```* ``LS_Cpp03`` (in configuration: ``c++03``)
* ``LS_Cpp11`` (in configuration: ``c++11``)
```
And we also move the deprecated alias into the text of the enum (otherwise it won't be added at the end as an option)
This patch includes a couple of other whitespace changes which help bring Format.h and ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst almost back into line and regeneratable... (there is still one more)
Reviewers: klimek, mitchell-stellar, sammccall
Reviewed By: mitchell-stellar, sammccall
Subscribers: mrexodia, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69433
-mvzeroupper will force the vzeroupper insertion pass to run on
CPUs that normally wouldn't. -mno-vzeroupper disables it on CPUs
where it normally runs.
To support this with the default feature handling in clang, we
need a vzeroupper feature flag in X86.td. Since this flag has
the opposite polarity of the fast-partial-ymm-or-zmm-write we
used to use to disable the pass, we now need to add this new
flag to every CPU except KNL/KNM and BTVER2 to keep identical
behavior.
Remove -fast-partial-ymm-or-zmm-write which is no longer used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69786
Add support for continuously syncing profile counter updates to a file.
The motivation for this is that programs do not always exit cleanly. On
iOS, for example, programs are usually killed via a signal from the OS.
Running atexit() handlers after catching a signal is unreliable, so some
method for progressively writing out profile data is necessary.
The approach taken here is to mmap() the `__llvm_prf_cnts` section onto
a raw profile. To do this, the linker must page-align the counter and
data sections, and the runtime must ensure that counters are mapped to a
page-aligned offset within a raw profile.
Continuous mode is (for the moment) incompatible with the online merging
mode. This limitation is lifted in https://reviews.llvm.org/D69586.
Continuous mode is also (for the moment) incompatible with value
profiling, as I'm not sure whether there is interest in this and the
implementation may be tricky.
As I have not been able to test extensively on non-Darwin platforms,
only Darwin support is included for the moment. However, continuous mode
may "just work" without modification on Linux and some UNIX-likes. AIUI
the default value for the GNU linker's `--section-alignment` flag is set
to the page size on many systems. This appears to be true for LLD as
well, as its `no_nmagic` option is on by default. Continuous mode will
not "just work" on Fuchsia or Windows, as it's not possible to mmap() a
section on these platforms. There is a proposal to add a layer of
indirection to the profile instrumentation to support these platforms.
rdar://54210980
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68351
Removed the explicit list of supported features from OpenMP 5.0 and used
the reference to the table instead. Also, fixed info about constructs
that can be executed in SPMD mode, if and num_threads clauses do not
affect it anymore.
Summary:
A new function pass (Transforms/CFGuard/CFGuard.cpp) inserts CFGuard checks on
indirect function calls, using either the check mechanism (X86, ARM, AArch64) or
or the dispatch mechanism (X86-64). The check mechanism requires a new calling
convention for the supported targets. The dispatch mechanism adds the target as
an operand bundle, which is processed by SelectionDAG. Another pass
(CodeGen/CFGuardLongjmp.cpp) identifies and emits valid longjmp targets, as
required by /guard:cf. This feature is enabled using the `cfguard` CC1 option.
Reviewers: thakis, rnk, theraven, pcc
Subscribers: ychen, hans, metalcanine, dmajor, tomrittervg, alex, mehdi_amini, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65761
Taking a value and the bitwise-or it with a non-zero constant will always
result in a non-zero value. In a boolean context, this is always true.
if (x | 0x4) {} // always true, intended '&'
This patch creates a new warning group -Wtautological-bitwise-compare for this
warning. It also moves in the existing tautological bitwise comparisons into
this group. A few other changes were needed to the CFGBuilder so that all bool
contexts would be checked. The warnings in -Wtautological-bitwise-compare will
be off by default due to using the CFG.
Fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42666
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66046
llvm-svn: 375318
The idea of this page is to document work in progress functionality
and also describe the plan of future development work.
Patch by Anastasia Stulova.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69072
llvm-svn: 375111
I noticed that compiling on Windows with -fno-ms-compatibility had the
side effect of defining __GNUC__, along with __GNUG__, __GXX_RTTI__, and
a number of other macros for GCC compatibility. This is undesirable and
causes Chromium to do things like mix __attribute__ and __declspec,
which doesn't work. We should have a positive language option to enable
GCC compatibility features so that we can experiment with
-fno-ms-compatibility on Windows. This change adds -fgnuc-version= to be
that option.
My issue aside, users have, for a long time, reported that __GNUC__
doesn't match their expectations in one way or another. We have
encouraged users to migrate code away from this macro, but new code
continues to be written assuming a GCC-only environment. There's really
nothing we can do to stop that. By adding this flag, we can allow them
to choose their own adventure with __GNUC__.
This overlaps a bit with the "GNUMode" language option from -std=gnu*.
The gnu language mode tends to enable non-conforming behaviors that we'd
rather not enable by default, but the we want to set things like
__GXX_RTTI__ by default, so I've kept these separate.
Helps address PR42817
Reviewed By: hans, nickdesaulniers, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68055
llvm-svn: 374449
Summary:
Quote from http://eel.is/c++draft/expr.add#4:
```
4 When an expression J that has integral type is added to or subtracted
from an expression P of pointer type, the result has the type of P.
(4.1) If P evaluates to a null pointer value and J evaluates to 0,
the result is a null pointer value.
(4.2) Otherwise, if P points to an array element i of an array object x with n
elements ([dcl.array]), the expressions P + J and J + P
(where J has the value j) point to the (possibly-hypothetical) array
element i+j of x if 0≤i+j≤n and the expression P - J points to the
(possibly-hypothetical) array element i−j of x if 0≤i−j≤n.
(4.3) Otherwise, the behavior is undefined.
```
Therefore, as per the standard, applying non-zero offset to `nullptr`
(or making non-`nullptr` a `nullptr`, by subtracting pointer's integral value
from the pointer itself) is undefined behavior. (*if* `nullptr` is not defined,
i.e. e.g. `-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks` was *not* specified.)
To make things more fun, in C (6.5.6p8), applying *any* offset to null pointer
is undefined, although Clang front-end pessimizes the code by not lowering
that info, so this UB is "harmless".
Since rL369789 (D66608 `[InstCombine] icmp eq/ne (gep inbounds P, Idx..), null -> icmp eq/ne P, null`)
LLVM middle-end uses those guarantees for transformations.
If the source contains such UB's, said code may now be miscompiled.
Such miscompilations were already observed:
* https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190826/687838.html
* https://github.com/google/filament/pull/1566
Surprisingly, UBSan does not catch those issues
... until now. This diff teaches UBSan about these UB's.
`getelementpointer inbounds` is a pretty frequent instruction,
so this does have a measurable impact on performance;
I've addressed most of the obvious missing folds (and thus decreased the performance impact by ~5%),
and then re-performed some performance measurements using my [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed ]] benchmark:
(all measurements done with LLVM ToT, the sanitizer never fired.)
* no sanitization vs. existing check: average `+21.62%` slowdown
* existing check vs. check after this patch: average `22.04%` slowdown
* no sanitization vs. this patch: average `48.42%` slowdown
Reviewers: vsk, filcab, rsmith, aaron.ballman, vitalybuka, rjmccall, #sanitizers
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, nickdesaulniers, nikic, ychen, dtzWill, xbolva00, dberris, arphaman, rupprecht, reames, regehr, llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67122
llvm-svn: 374293
Summary: The Google C++ and Chromium style guides are broken in the clang-format docs. This patch updates them.
Reviewers: djasper, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Patch by: m4tx
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61256
llvm-svn: 373844
Summary:
This patch makes the `SpacesInSquareBrackets` setting also apply to C++ lambdas with parameters.
Looking through the revision history, it appears support for only array brackets was added, and lambda brackets were ignored. Therefore, I am inclined to think it was simply an omission, rather than a deliberate choice.
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17887 and https://reviews.llvm.org/D4944.
Reviewers: MyDeveloperDay, reuk, owenpan
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Patch by: mitchell-stellar
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68473
llvm-svn: 373821
Summary:
Change the BraceWrappingFlags' AfterControlStatement from a bool to an enum with three values:
* "Never": This is the default, and does not do any brace wrapping after control statements.
* "MultiLine": This only wraps braces after multi-line control statements (this really only happens when a ColumnLimit is specified).
* "Always": This always wraps braces after control statements.
The first and last options are backwards-compatible with "false" and "true", respectively.
The new "MultiLine" option is useful for when a wrapped control statement's indentation matches the subsequent block's indentation. It makes it easier to see at a glance where the control statement ends and where the block's code begins. For example:
```
if (
foo
&& bar )
{
baz();
}
```
vs.
```
if (
foo
&& bar ) {
baz();
}
```
Short control statements (1 line) do not wrap the brace to the next line, e.g.
```
if (foo) {
bar();
} else {
baz();
}
```
Reviewers: sammccall, owenpan, reuk, MyDeveloperDay, klimek
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: MyDeveloperDay, cfe-commits
Patch By: mitchell-stellar
Tags: #clang-format, #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68296
llvm-svn: 373647
Summary:
The historical context:
- clang-format was written when C++11 was current,
and the main language-version concern was >> vs > > template-closers.
An option was added to allow selection of the 03/11 behavior, or auto-detection.
- there was no option to choose simply "latest standard" so anyone who didn't
ever want 03 behavior or auto-detection specified Cpp11.
- In r185149 this option started to affect lexer mode.
- no options were added to cover c++14, as parsing/formatting
didn't change that much. The usage of Cpp11 to mean "latest" became
codified e.g. in r206263
- c++17 added some new constructs. These were mostly backwards-compatible and so
not used in old programs, so having no way to turn them off was OK.
- c++20 added some new constructs and keywords (e.g. co_*) that changed the
meaning of existing programs, and people started to complain that
the c++20 parsing couldn't be turned off.
New plan:
- Default ('Auto') behavior remains unchanged: parse as latest, format
template-closers based on input.
- Add new 'Latest' option that more clearly expresses the intent "use
modern features" that many projects have chosen for their .clang-format files.
- Allow pinning to *any* language version, using the same name as clang -std:
c++03, c++11, c++14 etc. These set precise lexer options, and any
clang-format code depending on these can use a >= check.
- For backwards compatibility, `Cpp11` is an alias for `Latest`, not `c++11`.
This matches the historical documented semantics of this option.
This spelling (and `Cpp03`) are deprecated.
Reviewers: klimek, modocache
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67541
llvm-svn: 373439
And move the relevant information in the doc.
Summary:
Currently, building a large software like Firefox shows
'Use chrome://tracing or Speedscope App (https://www.speedscope.app) for flamegraph visualization'
for each file.
Reviewers: anton-afanasyev
Reviewed By: anton-afanasyev
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68260
llvm-svn: 373308
This matches how GCC handles it, see e.g. https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/HPplnl.
GCC documents the gnu_inline attribute with "In C++, this attribute does
not depend on extern in any way, but it still requires the inline keyword
to enable its special behavior."
The previous behaviour of gnu_inline in C++, without the extern
keyword, can be traced back to the original commit that added
support for gnu_inline, SVN r69045.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67414
llvm-svn: 373078
Summary:
This new Style rule is made as a part of adding support for NetBSD KNF in clang-format. NetBSD have it's own priority of includes which should be followed while formatting NetBSD code. This style sorts the Cpp Includes according to the priorities of NetBSD, as mentioned in the [Style Guide](http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/share/misc/style?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup)
The working of this Style rule shown below:
**Configuration:**
This revision introduces a new field under IncludeCategories named `SortPriority` which defines the priority of ordering the `#includes` and the `Priority` will define the categories for grouping the `#include blocks`.
Reviewers: cfe-commits, mgorny, christos, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, rdwampler, christos, mgorny, krytarowski
Patch By: Manikishan
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64695
llvm-svn: 372919
Summary: This patch fixes the __is_signed builtin type trait to work with floating point types and enums. Now, the builtin will return true if it is passed a floating point type and false for an enum type.
Reviewers: EricWF, rsmith, erichkeane, craig.topper, efriedma
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67897
llvm-svn: 372621
Commit c15aa241f8 ("[CLANG][BPF] change __builtin_preserve_access_index()
signature") changed the builtin function signature to
PointerT __builtin_preserve_access_index(PointerT ptr)
with a pointer type as the argument/return type, where argument and
return types must be the same.
There is really no reason for this constraint. The builtin just
presented a code region so that IR builtins
__builtin_{array, struct, union}_preserve_access_index
can be applied.
This patch removed the pointer type restriction to permit any
argument type as long as it is permitted by the compiler.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67883
llvm-svn: 372516
Summary:
This patch adds support for the Whitesmiths indentation style to clang-format. It’s an update to a patch submitted in 2015 (D6833), but reworks it to use the newer API.
There are still some issues with this patch, primarily around `switch` and `case` support. The added unit test won’t currently pass because of the remaining issues.
Reviewers: mboehme, MyDeveloperDay, djasper
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: krasimir, MyDeveloperDay, echristo, cfe-commits
Patch By: @timwoj (Tim Wojtulewicz)
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67627
llvm-svn: 372497
Alexey Bataev