Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Adrian Prantl 1eadba1c8c Renumber testcase metadata nodes after r290153.
This patch renumbers the metadata nodes in debug info testcases after
https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769. This is a separate patch because it
causes so much churn. This was implemented with a python script that
pipes the testcases through llvm-as - | llvm-dis - and then goes
through the original and new output side-by side to insert all
comments at a close-enough location.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27765

llvm-svn: 290292
2016-12-22 00:45:21 +00:00
Adrian Prantl bceaaa9643 [IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable.
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.

Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:

(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
    not how to get to its location.

(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
    replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.

(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
    more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
    DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s).  We also moved away from attaching the
    DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.

This reapplies r289902 with additional testcase upgrades and a change
to the Bitcode record for DIGlobalVariable, that makes upgrading the
old format unambiguous also for variables without DIExpressions.

<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769

llvm-svn: 290153
2016-12-20 02:09:43 +00:00
Adrian Prantl 73ec065604 Revert "[IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable."
This reverts commit 289920 (again).
I forgot to implement a Bitcode upgrade for the case where a DIGlobalVariable
has not DIExpression. Unfortunately it is not possible to safely upgrade
these variables without adding a flag to the bitcode record indicating which
version they are.
My plan of record is to roll the planned follow-up patch that adds a
unit: field to DIGlobalVariable into this patch before recomitting.
This way we only need one Bitcode upgrade for both changes (with a
version flag in the bitcode record to safely distinguish the record
formats).

Sorry for the churn!

llvm-svn: 289982
2016-12-16 19:39:01 +00:00
Adrian Prantl 74a835cda0 [IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable.
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.

Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:

(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
    not how to get to its location.

(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
    replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.

(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
    more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
    DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s).  We also moved away from attaching the
    DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.

This reapplies r289902 with additional testcase upgrades.

<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769

llvm-svn: 289920
2016-12-16 04:25:54 +00:00
Adrian Prantl 03c6d31a3b Revert "[IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable."
This reverts commit 289902 while investigating bot berakage.

llvm-svn: 289906
2016-12-16 01:00:30 +00:00
Adrian Prantl ce13935776 [IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable.
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.

Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:

(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
    not how to get to its location.

(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
    replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.

(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
    more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
    DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s).  We also moved away from attaching the
    DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.

<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769

llvm-svn: 289902
2016-12-16 00:36:43 +00:00
Alexei Starovoitov 2bb523f554 [bpf] attempt to fix big-endian bots
attempt to fix big-endian bots failing on new dwarfdump test

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
llvm-svn: 287522
2016-11-21 07:26:23 +00:00
Alexei Starovoitov 7ab125dbf3 [bpf] fix dwarf elf relocs and line numbers
- teach RelocVisitor to recognize bpf relocations
- fix AsmInfo->PointerSize to make sure dwarf is emitted correctly
- add a test for the above

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
llvm-svn: 287521
2016-11-21 06:21:23 +00:00