This is consistent with -Wbuiltin-macro-redefined, and puts this common
extension warning under a flag.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3283
llvm-svn: 205591
While investigating some debug info issues, Eric and I came across a
particular template case where the location of a decl was quite
different from the range of the same decl. It might've been rather
helpful if the dumper had actually showed us this.
llvm-svn: 205396
(for an integer too large for any signed type) from Warning to ExtWarn -- it's
ill-formed in C++11 and C99 onwards, and UB during translation in C89 and
C++98. Add diagnostic groups for two relevant diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 203974
the clang diagnostic has to report a column number one less than the correct
value in order for the IDE to move the cursor to the expected location. This
behavior is changed in VS2012 and VS2013 so that the IDE is now expecting the
column number to match the actual source location.
Before: source(line, column-1): type: message
After: source(line, column): type: message
This patch changes -fdiagnostics-format=msvc to match the new VS2012 and VS2013
when fmsc-version is 1700 or greater.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2949
llvm-svn: 203183
Serialized diagnostics were accidentally using the AST diagnostic level values
rather than a dedicated stable enum, so the addition of "remark" broke the
reading of existing serialized diagnostics files. I've added a .dia file
generated from Xcode 5's Clang to make sure we don't break this in the future.
llvm-svn: 202733
This starts to switch ARCMT to use proper diagnostic messages. The old use was
based on incorrect example code from the documentation.
The logic of the previous report() functions has been retained to support any
external consumers that might be intercepting diagnostic messages through the
old interface.
Note that the change in test/Misc/warning-flags.c isn't a new warning without a
flag, rather one that was previously invisible to the test. Adding a flag might
be a good idea though.
llvm-svn: 200124
'%clang -verify' will now issue an error instead of succeeding without
verification. This should catch flawed tests like r199347.
Followup to r199451.
llvm-svn: 199455
Additionally, remove the optional nature of the spelling list index when creating attributes. This is supported by table generating a Spelling enumeration when the spellings for an attribute are distinct enough to warrant it.
llvm-svn: 199378
Since this warning was generalized, it was also given a sensible warning group flag and the corresponding test was updated to reflect this.
llvm-svn: 198053
This patch was submitted to the list for review and didn't receive a LGTM.
(In fact one explicit objection and one query were raised.)
This reverts commit r197295.
llvm-svn: 197299
Previously, a line like
// expected-error-re {{foo}}
treats the entirety of foo as a regex. This is inconvenient when matching type
names containing regex characters. For example, to match
"void *(class test8::A::*)(void)" inside such a regex, one would have to type
"void \*\(class test8::A::\*\)\(void\)".
This patch changes the semantics of expected-error-re to only treat the parts
of the directive wrapped in double curly braces as regexes. This avoids the
escaping problem and leads to nicer patterns for those cases; see e.g. the
change to test/Sema/format-strings-scanf.c.
(The balanced search for closing }} of a directive also makes us handle the
full directive in test\SemaCXX\constexpr-printing.cpp:41 and :53.)
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2388
llvm-svn: 197092
the GNU documentation: the attribute only appertains to the label if it is
followed by a semicolon. Based on a patch by Aaron Ballman!
llvm-svn: 194869
In the test case one type is coming from a typedef with no default arg, the
other has the default arg. Taking the default arg from the typedef crashes, so
always use the real template paramter declaration. PR17510.
llvm-svn: 192202
This solves two problems:
1) MSBuild will not flag the build as unsuccessful just because we print
an error in the output, since "error(clang):" doesn't seem to match
the regex it's using.
2) It becomes more clear that the diagnostic is coming from clang as
supposed to cl.exe.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1735
llvm-svn: 191250
This patch adds the following, more specific warning flags:
gnu-anonymous-struct
gnu-compound-literal-initializer
gnu-empty-struct
gnu-flexible-array-initializer
gnu-flexible-array-union-member
gnu-folding-constant
redeclared-class-member
gnu-redeclared-enum
gnu-union-cast
gnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end
Patch by Peter Lewis.
llvm-svn: 190972
"long long" which is currently technically only "reserved for future" use in OpenCL, but
since clang in OpenCL mode supports it we may as well test the modifications to
the settings made for that type.
llvm-svn: 190297
Summary: I added the display of the VarDecl contained in the statement.
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1596
llvm-svn: 189941
Various tests had sprung up over the years which had --check-prefix=ABC on the
RUN line, but "CHECK-ABC:" later on. This happened to work before, but was
strictly incorrect. FileCheck is getting stricter soon though.
Patch by Ron Ofir.
llvm-svn: 188174
It turns out that Plum Hall depends on us not emitting an error on
integer literals which fit into long long, but fit into
unsigned long long. So C99 conformance requires not conforming to C99. :)
llvm-svn: 187172
Reid Kleckner