With this change, `TargetInfo::adjustRelaxExpr` is only related to TLS
relaxations and a subsequent clean-up can delete the `data` parameter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92079
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
These functions call relocateOne(). This patch is a prerequisite for
making relocateOne() aware of `Symbol` (D73254).
Reviewed By: grimar, nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73250
This assertion was added as part of D70659 but did not account for .bss
input sections. I noticed that this assert was incorrectly triggering
while building FreeBSD for MIPS64. Fixed by relaxing the assert to also
account for SHT_NOBITS input sections and adjust the test
mips-jalr-non-function.s to link a file with a .bss section first.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72567
RELA targets don't read initial .got.plt entries.
REL targets (ARM, x86-32) write the address of the IFUNC resolver to the
entry (`write32le(buf, s.getVA())`).
The default writeIgotPlt() is not meaningful. Make it a no-op. AArch64
and x86-64 will have 0 as initial .got.plt entries associated with
IFUNC.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72474
This reverts commit 2bbd32f5e8, it was
causing UBSan failures like the following:
lld/ELF/Target.cpp:103:41: runtime error: applying non-zero offset 24 to null pointer
Summary:
So far it seems like the only test affected by this change is the one I
recently added for R_MIPS_JALR relocations since the other test cases that
use this function early (unknown-relocation-*) do not have a valid input
section for the relocation offset.
Reviewers: ruiu, grimar, MaskRay, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu, MaskRay
Subscribers: emaste, sdardis, jrtc27, atanasyan, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70659
Fixes AArch64 part of PR40438
The current range extension thunk framework does not handle a relocation
relative to a STT_SECTION symbol with a non-zero addend, which may be
used by jumps/calls to local functions on some RELA targets (AArch64,
powerpc ELFv1, powerpc64 ELFv2, etc). See PR40438 and the following
code for examples:
// clang -target $target a.cc
// .text.cold may be placed in a separate output section.
// The distance between bar in .text.cold and foo in .text may be larger than 128MiB.
static void foo() {}
__attribute__((section(".text.cold"))) static int bar() { foo(); return
0; }
__attribute__((used)) static int dummy = bar();
This patch makes such thunks with addends work for AArch64. The target
independent part can be reused by PPC in the future.
On REL targets (ARM, MIPS), jumps/calls are not represented as
STT_SECTION + non-zero addend (see
MCELFObjectTargetWriter::needsRelocateWithSymbol), so they don't need
this feature, but we need to make sure this patch does not affect them.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70637
The only condition that isecLoc becomes null is
Out::bufferStart == nullptr,
isec->getParent()->offset == 0, and
isec->outSecOff == 0.
We can check the first condition only once.
llvm-svn: 374332
isecLoc there can be null, but at the same time isec->getSize() may
be non-null. It is UB to offset a nullptr.The most straight-forward fix
here appears to perform casts+normal integral arithmetics.
FAIL: lld :: ELF/invalid/invalid-relocation-aarch64.test (1158 of 2217)
******************** TEST 'lld :: ELF/invalid/invalid-relocation-aarch64.test' FAILED ********************
Script:
--
: 'RUN: at line 2'; /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/yaml2obj /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/lld/test/ELF/invalid/invalid-relocation-aarch64.test -o /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/tools/lld/test/ELF/invalid/Output/invalid-relocation-aarch64.test.tmp.o
: 'RUN: at line 3'; not /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/ld.lld /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/tools/lld/test/ELF/invalid/Output/invalid-relocation-aarch64.test.tmp.o -o /dev/null 2>&1 | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/lld/test/ELF/invalid/invalid-relocation-aarch64.test
--
Exit Code: 1
Command Output (stderr):
--
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/lld/test/ELF/invalid/invalid-relocation-aarch64.test:4:10: error: CHECK: expected string not found in input
# CHECK: error: unknown relocation (1024) against symbol foo
^
<stdin>:1:1: note: scanning from here
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/lld/ELF/Target.cpp💯41: runtime error: applying non-zero offset 24 to null pointer
^
<stdin>:1:118: note: possible intended match here
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/lld/ELF/Target.cpp💯41: runtime error: applying non-zero offset 24 to null pointer
^
--
********************
Testing: 0.. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.
FAIL: lld :: ELF/invalid/invalid-relocation-x64.test (1270 of 2217)
******************** TEST 'lld :: ELF/invalid/invalid-relocation-x64.test' FAILED ********************
Script:
--
: 'RUN: at line 2'; /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/yaml2obj /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/lld/test/ELF/invalid/invalid-relocation-x64.test -o /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/tools/lld/test/ELF/invalid/Output/invalid-relocation-x64.test.tmp1.o
: 'RUN: at line 3'; echo ".global foo; foo:" > /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/tools/lld/test/ELF/invalid/Output/invalid-relocation-x64.test.tmp2.s
: 'RUN: at line 4'; /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/llvm-mc /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/tools/lld/test/ELF/invalid/Output/invalid-relocation-x64.test.tmp2.s -o /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/tools/lld/test/ELF/invalid/Output/invalid-relocation-x64.test.tmp2.o -filetype=obj -triple x86_64-pc-linux
: 'RUN: at line 5'; not /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/ld.lld /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/tools/lld/test/ELF/invalid/Output/invalid-relocation-x64.test.tmp1.o /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/tools/lld/test/ELF/invalid/Output/invalid-relocation-x64.test.tmp2.o -o /dev/null 2>&1 | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/lld/test/ELF/invalid/invalid-relocation-x64.test
--
Exit Code: 1
Command Output (stderr):
--
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/lld/test/ELF/invalid/invalid-relocation-x64.test:6:10: error: CHECK: expected string not found in input
# CHECK: error: unknown relocation (152) against symbol foo
^
<stdin>:1:1: note: scanning from here
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/lld/ELF/Target.cpp💯41: runtime error: applying non-zero offset 24 to null pointer
^
<stdin>:1:118: note: possible intended match here
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/lld/ELF/Target.cpp💯41: runtime error: applying non-zero offset 24 to null pointer
^
--
********************
Testing: 0.. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60.. 70.. 80.. 90..
Testing Time: 20.73s
********************
Failing Tests (2):
lld :: ELF/invalid/invalid-relocation-aarch64.test
lld :: ELF/invalid/invalid-relocation-x64.test
llvm-svn: 374329
This makes it clear `ELF/**/*.cpp` files define things in the `lld::elf`
namespace and simplifies `elf::foo` to `foo`.
Reviewed By: atanasyan, grimar, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68323
llvm-svn: 373885
This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote
using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the
source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual
post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against
lld's code base.
Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html
In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable
naming scheme change, and this patch does that.
I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that
is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter.
Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld
repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts
because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But
there's a remedy.
clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your
downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to
a commit after the mass renaming:
1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming,
2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and
3. rebase again to the head.
Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and
for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and
disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by
hand, but that shouldn't be too many.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121
llvm-svn: 365595
This is based on D54720 by Sean Fertile.
When accessing a global symbol which is not defined in the translation unit,
compilers will generate instructions that load the address from the toc entry.
If the symbol is defined, non-preemptable, and addressable with a 32-bit
signed offset from the toc pointer, the address can be computed
directly. e.g.
addis 3, 2, .LC0@toc@ha # R_PPC64_TOC16_HA
ld 3, .LC0@toc@l(3) # R_PPC64_TOC16_LO_DS, load the address from a .toc entry
ld/lwa 3, 0(3) # load the value from the address
.section .toc,"aw",@progbits
.LC0: .tc var[TC],var
can be relaxed to
addis 3,2,var@toc@ha # this may be relaxed to a nop,
addi 3,3,var@toc@l # then this becomes addi 3,2,var@toc
ld/lwa 3, 0(3) # load the value from the address
We can delete the test ppc64-got-indirect.s as its purpose is covered by
newly added ppc64-toc-relax.s and ppc64-toc-relax-constants.s
Reviewed By: ruiu, sfertile
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60958
llvm-svn: 360112
This lets us remove the special case from Writer::writeSections(), and also
fixes a bug where .eh_frame_hdr isn't necessarily written in the correct
order if a linker script moves .eh_frame and .eh_frame_hdr into the same
output section.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58795
llvm-svn: 355153
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Patch by Michael Skvortsov!
This change adds a basic support for linking static MSP430 ELF code.
Implemented relocation types are intended to correspond to the BFD.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56535
llvm-svn: 350819
Recommitting https://reviews.llvm.org/rL344544 after fixing undefined behavior
from left-shifting a negative value. Original commit message:
This support is slightly different then the X86_64 implementation in that calls
to __morestack don't need to get rewritten to calls to __moresatck_non_split
when a split-stack caller calls a non-split-stack callee. Instead the size of
the stack frame requested by the caller is adjusted prior to the call to
__morestack. The size the stack-frame will be adjusted by is tune-able through a
new --split-stack-adjust-size option.
llvm-svn: 344622
This reverts commit https://reviews.llvm.org/rL344544, which causes failures on
a undefined behaviour sanitizer bot -->
lld/ELF/Arch/PPC64.cpp:849:35: runtime error: left shift of negative value -1
llvm-svn: 344551
This support is slightly different then the X86_64 implementation in that calls
to __morestack don't need to get rewritten to calls to __moresatck_non_split
when a split-stack caller calls a non-split-stack callee. Instead the size of
the stack frame requested by the caller is adjusted prior to the call to
__morestack. The size the stack-frame will be adjusted by is tune-able through a
new --split-stack-adjust-size option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52099
llvm-svn: 344544
Patch by PkmX.
This patch makes lld recognize RISC-V target and implements basic
relocation for RV32/RV64 (and RVC). This should be necessary for static
linking ELF applications.
The ABI documentation for RISC-V can be found at:
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/blob/master/riscv-elf.md.
Note that the documentation is far from complete so we had to figure out
some details from bfd.
The patch should be pretty straightforward. Some highlights:
- A new relocation Expr R_RISCV_PC_INDIRECT is added. This is needed as
the low part of a PC-relative relocation is linked to the corresponding
high part (auipc), see:
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/blob/master/riscv-elf.md#pc-relative-symbol-addresses
- LLVM's MC support for RISC-V is very incomplete (we are working on
this), so tests are given in objectyaml format with the original
assembly included in the comments. Once we have complete support for
RISC-V in MC, we can switch to llvm-as/llvm-objdump.
- We don't support linker relaxation for now as it requires greater
changes to lld that is beyond the scope of this patch. Once this is
accepted we can start to work on adding relaxation to lld.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39322
llvm-svn: 339364
We have the following code that is uncovered with the test:
https://github.com/llvm-mirror/lld/blob/master/ELF/Target.cpp#L95
This patch:
1) Removes "!IS" check. Because at that point of execution
(we are reolving the relocations during writing output)
we should only have InputSection type of the sections in the vector.
(because we already converted MergeInputSection in mergeSections()
and combined EhInputSections in combineEhFrameSections()).
2) Covers the "!IS->getParent()" with the test.
llvm-svn: 336106
Patch teaches LLD to hint user about -fdebug-types-section flag
if relocation overflow happens in debug section.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40954
llvm-svn: 328081
Now that we have only SymbolBody as the symbol class. So, "SymbolBody"
is a bit strange name now. This is a mechanical change generated by
perl -i -pe s/SymbolBody/Symbol/g $(git grep -l SymbolBody lld/ELF lld/COFF)
nd clang-format-diff.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39459
llvm-svn: 317370
This change adds initial support for range extension thunks. All thunks must
be created within the first pass so some corner cases are not supported. A
follow up patch will add support for multiple passes.
With this change the existing tests arm-branch-error.s and
arm-thumb-branch-error.s now no longer fail with an out of range branch.
These have been renamed and tests added for the range extension thunk.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34691
llvm-svn: 316752
Summary:
The COFF linker and the ELF linker have long had similar but separate
Error.h and Error.cpp files to implement error handling. This change
introduces new error handling code in Common/ErrorHandler.h, changes the
COFF and ELF linkers to use it, and removes the old, separate
implementations.
Reviewers: ruiu
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: smeenai, jyknight, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, javed.absar, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39259
llvm-svn: 316624
We were using uint32_t as the type of relocation kind. It has a
readability issue because what Type really means in `uint32_t Type`
is not obvious. It could be a section type, a symbol type or a
relocation type.
Since we do not do any arithemetic operations on relocation types
(e.g. adding one to R_X86_64_PC32 doesn't make sense), it would be
more natural if they are represented as enums. Unfortunately, that
is not doable because relocation type definitions are spread into
multiple header files.
So I decided to use typedef. This still should be better than the
plain uint32_t because the intended type is now obvious.
llvm-svn: 315525
When parsing linker scripts, LLD previously started with a '.' value of 0,
regardless of the internal default image base for the target, and regardless of
switches such as --image-base. It seems reasonable to use a different image base
value when using linker scripts and --image-base is specified, since otherwise the
switch has no effect. This change does this, as well as removing unnecessary
initialisation of Dot where it is not used.
The default image base should not be used when processing linker
scripts, because this will change the behaviour for existing linker script users,
and potentially result in invalid output being produced, as a subsequent assignment
to Dot could move the location counter backwards. Instead, we maintain the existing
behaviour of starting from 0 if --image-base is not specified.
Reviewers: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38360
llvm-svn: 315293
In preparation for range extension thunks introduce a function that will
check whether a branch identified by a relocation type at a source address
can reach a destination.
For targets where range extension thunks are not supported the function will
return true as it is not expected that branches are out of range. An
implementation has been provided for ARM.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34690
llvm-svn: 308188
Add support for the most common SPARC relocations.
Make DT_PLTGOT point to the PLT on SPARC.
Mark the PLT as executable on SPARC.
This adds a basic test that creates a SPARV9 executable
that invokes the exit system call on OpenBSD.
Patch by Mark Kettenis.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34618
llvm-svn: 306565
Target.cpp contains code for all the targets that LLD supports. It was
simple and easy, but as the number of supported targets increased,
it got messy.
This patch splits the file into per-target files under ELF/arch directory.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34222
llvm-svn: 305565
Currently the freebsd early boot code fails to link. The issue reduces
to 16 bit code at position 0x7000 wanting to jump to position
0x9000. That is represented in the .o file as a relocation with no
symbol and an addend of 0x9000 - 2 (The -2 is because i386 uses the ip
after the current instruction for jumps).
If the addend is interpreted as signed (it should), it is -28674. In a
32 bit architecture, that is the address 0xffff8ffe. To get there from
0x7000 we have to add 4294909950 (too big) or subtract 57346 (too
small). We then produce an error.
What lld is missing is the fact that at runtime this will actually be
a 16 bit architecture and adding 0x1ffe produces 0x8ffe which is the
correct result in 16 bits (-28674).
Since we have a 16 bit addend and a 16 bit PC, the relocation can move
the PC to any 16 bit address and that is the only thing we really need
to check: if the address we are pointing to fits in 16 bits. This is
unfortunately hard to do since we have to delay subtracting the PC and
if we want to do that outside of Target.cpp, we have to move the
overflow check out too. An incomplete patch that tries to do that is
at https://reviews.llvm.org/D34070
This patch instead just relaxes the check. Since the value we have is
the destination minus the PC and the PC is 16 bits, it should fit in
17 bits if the destination fits in 16 too.
bfd had a similar issue for some time and got a similar fix:
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-08/msg00001.html
llvm-svn: 305135
This creates a new library called BinaryFormat that has all of
the headers from llvm/Support containing structure and layout
definitions for various types of binary formats like dwarf, coff,
elf, etc as well as the code for identifying a file from its
magic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33843
llvm-svn: 304864
Before InputSectionBase had an OutputSection pointer, but that was not
always valid. For example, if it was a merge section one actually had
to look at MergeSec->OutSec.
This was brittle and caused bugs like the one fixed by r304260.
We now have a single Parent pointer that points to an OutputSection
for InputSection, but to a SyntheticSection for merge sections and
.eh_frame. This makes it impossible to accidentally access an invalid
OutSec.
llvm-svn: 304338
This change adds support for the R_ARM_SBREL32 relocation. The relocation
is a base relative relocation that is produced by clang/llvm when -frwpi
is used. The use case for the -frwpi option is position independent data
for embedded systems that do not have a GOT. With -frwpi all data is
accessed via an offset from a base register (usually r9), where r9 is set
at run time to where the data has been loaded. The base of the data is
known as the static base.
The ARM ABI defines the static base as:
B(S) is the addressing origin of the output segment defining the symbol S.
The origin is not required to be the base address of the segment. For
simplicity we choose to use the base address of the segment.
The ARM procedure call standard only defines a read write variant using
R_ARM_SBREL32 relocations. The read-only data is accessed via pc-relative
offsets from the code, this is implemented in clang as -fropi.
Fixes PR32924
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33280
llvm-svn: 303337
This reverts changes introduced in r302414 "[ELF] - Set DF_STATIC_TLS flag for i386 target."
Because DF_STATIC_TLS does not look to be used by glibc or anything else.
llvm-svn: 302884
Both gold and bfd restrict that one:
ld.bfd: test.o: relocation R_X86_64_TPOFF32 against `var' can not be
used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
ld.gold: error: test.o: unsupported reloc 23 against global symbol var
What looks reasonable because it is 32 bit one. Patch do the same.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33100
llvm-svn: 302881
Fangrui Song