The right shift operator was not seen as a valid operator in a fold expression, which is PR32563.
Patch by Nicolas Lesser ("Blitz Rakete")!
llvm-svn: 317032
With enabled CINDEXTEST_CODE_COMPLETE_PATTERNS env option (which enables
IncludeCodePatterns in completion options) code completion after colon
currently suggests access modifiers with 2 completion chunks which is
incorrect.
Example:
class A : <Cursor>B
{
}
Currently we get 'NotImplemented:{TypedText public}{Colon :} (40)'
but the correct line is just 'NotImplemented:{TypedText public} (40)'
The fix introduces more specific scope that occurs between ':' and '{'
It allows us to determine when we don't need to add ':' as a second
chunk to the public/protected/private access modifiers.
Patch by Ivan Donchevskii!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38618
llvm-svn: 316436
Treat 'f()' as 'f(void)' rather than a function w/o a prototype.
Reviewers: Anastasia, yaxunl
Reviewed By: Anastasia, yaxunl
Subscribers: cfe-commits, echuraev, chapuni
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33681
Re-apply revision 306653.
llvm-svn: 315453
declaration.
Patch allows using of the `#pragma omp declare target`| `#pragma omp end
declare target` directives inside the structures if we need to mark as
declare target only some static members.
llvm-svn: 314833
Allow the proper recognition of Enum values and global variables inside ms inline-asm memory / immediate expressions, as they require some additional overhead and treated incorrect if doesn't early recognized.
supersedes D33278, D35774
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37413
llvm-svn: 314494
This implements the proposed approach in https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/33
This reinstates r313827, reverted in r313856, with a fix for the 'out-of-bounds
enumeration value' ubsan error in that change.
llvm-svn: 313955
This is a recommit of r312781; in some build configurations
variable names are omitted, so changed the new regression
test accordingly.
llvm-svn: 312794
Summary: The crash occured when FunctionDecl was parsed with an initializer.
Reviewers: bkramer, klimek, francisco.lopes
Reviewed By: bkramer
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37382
llvm-svn: 312788
This adds _Float16 as a source language type, which is a 16-bit floating point
type defined in C11 extension ISO/IEC TS 18661-3.
In follow up patches documentation and more tests will be added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33719
llvm-svn: 312781
When we have enabled cache for global completions we did not have
diagnostics for Bar and could not complete Ba as in provided code
example.
template <typename T>
struct Foo { T member; };
template<typename T> using Bar = Foo<T>;
int main() {
Ba
}
(This is the fixed version of r 311442, which was reverted in r311445.)
Patch by Ivan Donchevskii!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35355
llvm-svn: 312780
move constructor.
Previously user-defined reduction initializer was considered as an
assignment expression, not as initializer. Fixed this by treating the
initializer expression as an initializer.
llvm-svn: 312638
This is the same assertion as in https://reviews.llvm.org/D25206 that is
triggered when RecordLayoutBuilder tries to compute the size of a field
(for capture "typo_boo" in the test case) whose type hasn't been
deduced.
The fix is to add CorrectDelayedTyposInExpr call to the cases when we
aren't disambiguating between an Obj-C message send and a lambda
expression.
rdar://problem/31760839
Reviewers: rsmith, ahatanak
Reviewed By: arphaman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36853
llvm-svn: 311480
When we have enabled cache for global completions we did not have
diagnostics for Bar and could not complete Ba as in provided code
example.
template <typename T>
struct Foo { T member; };
template<typename T> using Bar = Foo<T>;
int main() {
Ba
}
Patch by Ivan Donchevskii!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35355
llvm-svn: 311442
Summary:
The crash occurs when the first token after a preamble is a macro
expansion.
Fixed by moving replayPreambleConditionalStack from Parser into
Preprocessor. It is now called right after the predefines file is
processed.
Reviewers: erikjv, bkramer, klimek, yvvan
Reviewed By: bkramer
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36872
llvm-svn: 311330
the class becoming complete and its inline methods being parsed.
This replaces the hack of using the "late parsed template" flag to track member
functions with bodies we've not parsed yet; instead we now use the "will have
body" flag, which carries the desired implication that the function declaration
*is* a definition, and that we've just not parsed its body yet.
llvm-svn: 310776
Such implicitly declared functions behave as if the enclosing block
contained the declaration extern int name() (C90, 6.3.3.2 Function calls),
thus their names should have block scope (C90, 6.1.2.1 Scope of identifiers).
This patch fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33224
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33676
llvm-svn: 310616
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The second recommit (r309106) was reverted because the "non-default #pragma
pack value chages the alignment of struct or union members in the included file"
warning proved to be too aggressive for external projects like Chromium
(https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=749197). This recommit
makes the problematic warning a non-default one, and gives it the
-Wpragma-pack-suspicious-include warning option.
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309386
The warning fires on non-suspicious code in Chromium. Reverting until a
solution is figured out.
> Recommit r308327 2nd time: Add a warning for missing
> '#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
>
> The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
> change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
> in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
> #includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
> alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
>
> Original message:
>
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309186
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309106
This seems to have broken the sanitizer-x86_64-linux buildbot. Reverting until
it's fixed, especially since this landed just before the 5.0 branch.
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308455
and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308441
of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308327
Jan Korous