This is a re-apply of rL313082 which was reverted in rL313088
In rL289668 the ability to specify the default linker at compile time
was added but because the MinGW driver used custom detection we could
not take advantage of this new CMAKE flag CLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER.
rL289668 added no test cases and the mingw driver was either overlooked
or purposefully skipped because it has some custom linker tests
Removing them here because they are covered by the generic case.
Reviewers: rnk
Differntial Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37727
llvm-svn: 317397
This reverts commit 4e4ee1c507e2707bb3c208e1e1b6551c3015cbf5.
This is failing due to some code that isn't built on MSVC
so I didn't catch. Not immediately obvious how to fix this
at first glance, so I'm reverting for now.
llvm-svn: 315536
There's a lot of misuse of Twine scattered around LLVM. This
ranges in severity from benign (returning a Twine from a function
by value that is just a string literal) to pretty sketchy (storing
a Twine by value in a class). While there are some uses for
copying Twines, most of the very compelling ones are confined
to the Twine class implementation itself, and other uses are
either dubious or easily worked around.
This patch makes Twine's copy constructor private, and fixes up
all callsites.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38767
llvm-svn: 315530
This reverts rL313102 because it still fails some build bot tests.
On many linux bots it fails with the following error.
error: invalid linker name in argument '-fuse-ld=lld'
and on some windows bots also because there is no ld.lld.exe
lld-link.exe: warning: ignoring unknown argument: -fuse-ld=lld
llvm-svn: 313104
In rL289668 the ability to specify the default linker at compile time
was added but because the MinGW driver used custom detection we could
not take advantage of this new CMAKE flag CLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER.
This is a re-apply of rL313082 which was reverted in rL313088
due to failing buildbot tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37727
llvm-svn: 313102
In rL289668 the ability to specify the default linker at compile time
was added but because the MinGW driver used custom detection we could
not take advantage of this new CMAKE flag CLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER.
llvm-svn: 313082
This commit fixes a bug where clang/llvm doesn't emit an unwind table
for a function when it is marked noexcept. Without this patch, the
following code terminates with an uncaught exception on ARM64:
int foo1() noexcept {
try {
throw 0;
} catch (int i) {
return 0;
}
return 1;
}
int main() {
return foo1();
}
rdar://problem/32411865
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35693
llvm-svn: 310006
Projects that want to statically link their own C++ standard library currently
need to pass -nostdlib or -nodefaultlibs, which also disables linking of the
builtins library, -lm, and so on. Alternatively, they could use `clang` instead
of `clang++`, but that already disables implicit addition of -lm on some
toolchains.
Add a dedicated flag -nostdlib++ that disables just linking of libc++ /
libstdc++. This is analogous to -nostdinc++.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35780
llvm-svn: 308997
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
Martell Malone