Add verification for copies involving generic registers if they are
compatible - ie if it is a generic copy, then the types are the
same, and if a COPY b/w generic and target virtual register, then
the sizes should be the same. Only checks if there are no sub registers
involved for now.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D37775
llvm-svn: 324696
Discussed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120320.html
In preparation for adding support for named vregs we are changing the sigil for
physical registers in MIR to '$' from '%'. This will prevent name clashes of
named physical register with named vregs.
llvm-svn: 323922
Add support for printing / parsing the addrspace of a MachineMemOperand.
Fixes PR35970.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42502
llvm-svn: 323521
Tests required minor manual tweaks:
CodeGen/MIR/X86/generic-instr-type.mir
CodeGen/X86/GlobalISel/select-copy.mir
CodeGen/X86/GlobalISel/select-ext.mir
CodeGen/X86/GlobalISel/select-intrinsic-x86-flags-read-u32.mir
CodeGen/X86/GlobalISel/select-phi.mir
CodeGen/X86/GlobalISel/select-trunc.mir
CodeGen/X86/GlobalISel/select-frameIndex.mir
And following tests are split into 32/64 versions:
CodeGen/X86/GlobalISel/legalize-GV.mir
CodeGen/X86/GlobalISel/select-frameIndex.mir
llvm-svn: 323209
Planning to add support for named vregs. This puts is in a conundrum since
physregs are named as well. To rectify this we need to use a sigil other than
'%' for physregs in MIR. We've settled on using '$' for physregs but first we
must repurpose it from external symbols using it, which is what this commit is
all about. We think '&' will have familiar semantics for C/C++ users.
llvm-svn: 322146
We are printing / parsing the `frame-setup` MachineInstr flag but not
the `frame-destroy` one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41509
llvm-svn: 322071
LLVM IR function names which disable mangling start with '\01'
(https://www.llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#identifiers).
When an identifier like "\01@abc@" gets dumped to MIR, it is quoted, but
only with single quotes.
http://www.yaml.org/spec/1.2/spec.html#id2770814:
"The allowed character range explicitly excludes the C0 control block
allowed), the surrogate block #xD800-#xDFFF, #xFFFE, and #xFFFF."
http://www.yaml.org/spec/1.2/spec.html#id2776092:
"All non-printable characters must be escaped.
[...]
Note that escape sequences are only interpreted in double-quoted scalars."
This patch adds support for printing escaped non-printable characters
between double quotes if needed.
Should also fix PR31743.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41290
llvm-svn: 320996
The following CFI directives are suported by MC but not by MIR:
* .cfi_rel_offset
* .cfi_adjust_cfa_offset
* .cfi_escape
* .cfi_remember_state
* .cfi_restore_state
* .cfi_undefined
* .cfi_register
* .cfi_window_save
Add support for printing, parsing and update tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41230
llvm-svn: 320819
Shrink wrapping should ignore DBG_VALUEs referring to frame indices,
since the presence of debug information must not affect code
generation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41187
llvm-svn: 320606
Summary:
Add isRenamable() predicate to MachineOperand. This predicate can be
used by machine passes after register allocation to determine whether it
is safe to rename a given register operand. Register operands that
aren't marked as renamable may be required to be assigned their current
register to satisfy constraints that are not captured by the machine
IR (e.g. ABI or ISA constraints).
Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB, hfinkel
Subscribers: nemanjai, mcrosier, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39400
llvm-svn: 320503
Summary:
Changed use_instructions() to use_nodbg_instructions() when
building an instruction set.
We don't want the presence of debug info to affect the code
we generate.
Reviewers: dblaikie, Eugene.Zelenko, chandlerc, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: aprantl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40882
llvm-svn: 320010
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format, print
MBB references as '%bb.5'.
The MIR printer prints the IR name of a MBB only for block definitions.
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)->getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(*\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)\.getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.txt" -o -name "*.s" -o -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#([0-9]+)/%bb.\1/g'
* grep -nr 'BB#' and fix
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40422
llvm-svn: 319665
output
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format,
always use `printReg` to print all kinds of registers.
Updated the tests using '_' instead of '%noreg' until we decide which
one we want to be the default one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40421
llvm-svn: 319445
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format, avoid
printing "vreg" for virtual registers (which is one of the current MIR
possibilities).
Basically:
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E "s/%vreg([0-9]+)/%\1/g"
* grep -nr '%vreg' . and fix if needed
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E "s/ vreg([0-9]+)/ %\1/g"
* grep -nr 'vreg[0-9]\+' . and fix if needed
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40420
llvm-svn: 319427
Summary:
They're not always mutually exclusive. read-modify-write atomics are both
at the same time. One example of this is the SWP instructions on AArch64.
Another example is GlobalISel's G_ATOMICRMW_* generic instructions which
will be added in a later patch.
Reviewers: arphaman, aemerson
Reviewed By: aemerson
Subscribers: aemerson, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40157
llvm-svn: 319202
Shadow stack solution introduces a new stack for return addresses only.
The HW has a Shadow Stack Pointer (SSP) that points to the next return address.
If we return to a different address, an exception is triggered.
The shadow stack is managed using a series of intrinsics that are introduced in this patch as well as the new register (SSP).
The intrinsics are mapped to new instruction set that implements CET mechanism.
The patch also includes initial infrastructure support for IBT.
For more information, please see the following:
https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/4d/2a/control-flow-enforcement-technology-preview.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40223
Change-Id: I4daa1f27e88176be79a4ac3b4cd26a459e88fed4
llvm-svn: 318996
Summary:
Print %subreg.<subregidxname> instead of just the subregister
index when printing immediate operands corresponding to subreg
indices in INSERT_SUBREG, EXTRACT_SUBREG, SUBREG_TO_REG and
REG_SEQUENCE.
Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB
Reviewed By: MatzeB
Subscribers: nhaehnle, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39696
llvm-svn: 317513
As of today we only use .cfi_offset to specify the offset of a CSR, but
we never use .cfi_restore when the CSR is restored.
If we want to perform a more advanced type of shrink-wrapping, we need
to use .cfi_restore in order to switch the CFI state between blocks.
This patch only aims at adding support for the directive.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36114
llvm-svn: 317199
This updates the MIRPrinter to include the regclass when printing
virtual register defs, which is already valid syntax for the
parser. That is, given 64 bit %0 and %1 in a "gpr" regbank,
%1(s64) = COPY %0(s64)
would now be written as
%1:gpr(s64) = COPY %0(s64)
While this change alone introduces a bit of redundancy with the
registers block, it allows us to update the tests to be more concise
and understandable and brings us closer to being able to remove the
registers block completely.
Note: We generally only print the class in defs, but there is one
exception. If there are uses without any defs whatsoever, we'll print
the class on all uses. I'm not completely convinced this comes up in
meaningful machine IR, but for now the MIRParser and MachineVerifier
both accept that kind of stuff, so we don't want to have a situation
where we can print something we can't parse.
llvm-svn: 316479
This converts a large and somewhat arbitrary set of tests to use
update_mir_test_checks. I ran the script on all of the tests I expect
to need to modify for an upcoming mir syntax change and kept the ones
that obviously didn't change the tests in ways that might make it
harder to understand.
llvm-svn: 316137
Summary:
The comments in the code said
// Remove <def,read-undef> flags. This def is now a partial redef.
but the code didn't just remove read-undef, it could introduce new ones which
could cause errors.
E.g. if we have something like
%vreg1<def> = IMPLICIT_DEF
%vreg2:subreg1<def, read-undef> = op %vreg3, %vreg4
%vreg2:subreg2<def> = op %vreg6, %vreg7
and we merge %vreg1 and %vreg2 then we should not set undef on the second subreg
def, which the old code did.
Now we solve this by actually do what the code comment says. We remove
read-undef flags rather than remove or introduce them.
Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB
Reviewed By: MatzeB
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38616
llvm-svn: 315564
This time invoking llc with "-march=x86-64" in the testcase, so we don't assume
the default target is x86.
Summary:
If we have
%vreg0<def> = PHI %vreg2<undef>, <BB#0>, %vreg3, <BB#2>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg2,%vreg3
%vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32ri8 %vreg0<kill,tied0>, 1, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg0
then we can't just change %vreg0 into %vreg3, since %vreg2 is actually
undef. We would have to also copy the undef flag to be able to change the
register.
Instead we deal with this case like other cases where we can't just
replace the register: we insert a COPY. The code creating the COPY already
copied all flags from the PHI input, so the undef flag will be transferred
as it should.
Reviewers: kparzysz
Reviewed By: kparzysz
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38235
llvm-svn: 314882
Summary:
If we have
%vreg0<def> = PHI %vreg2<undef>, <BB#0>, %vreg3, <BB#2>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg2,%vreg3
%vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32ri8 %vreg0<kill,tied0>, 1, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg0
then we can't just change %vreg0 into %vreg3, since %vreg2 is actually
undef. We would have to also copy the undef flag to be able to change the
register.
Instead we deal with this case like other cases where we can't just
replace the register: we insert a COPY. The code creating the COPY already
copied all flags from the PHI input, so the undef flag will be transferred
as it should.
Reviewers: kparzysz
Reviewed By: kparzysz
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38235
llvm-svn: 314879
This re-applies commit r313685, this time with the proper updates to
the test cases.
Original commit message:
Unreachable blocks in the machine instr representation are these
weird empty blocks with no successors.
The MIR printer used to not print empty lists of successors. However,
the MIR parser now treats non-printed list of successors as "please
guess it for me". As a result, the parser tries to guess the list of
successors and given the block is empty, just assumes it falls through
the next block (if any).
For instance, the following test case used to fail the verifier.
The MIR printer would print
entry
/ \
true (def) false (no list of successors)
|
split.true (use)
The MIR parser would understand this:
entry
/ \
true (def) false
| / <-- invalid edge
split.true (use)
Because of the invalid edge, we get the "def does not
dominate all uses" error.
The fix consists in printing empty successor lists, so that the parser
knows what to do for unreachable blocks.
rdar://problem/34022159
llvm-svn: 313696
Unreachable blocks in the machine instr representation are these
weird empty blocks with no successors.
The MIR printer used to not print empty lists of successors. However,
the MIR parser now treats non-printed list of successors as "please
guess it for me". As a result, the parser tries to guess the list of
successors and given the block is empty, just assumes it falls through
the next block (if any).
For instance, the following test case used to fail the verifier.
The MIR printer would print
entry
/ \
true (def) false (no list of successors)
|
split.true (use)
The MIR parser would understand this:
entry
/ \
true (def) false
| / <-- invalid edge
split.true (use)
Because of the invalid edge, we get the "def does not
dominate all uses" error.
The fix consists in printing empty successor lists, so that the parser
knows what to do for unreachable blocks.
rdar://problem/34022159
llvm-svn: 313685
Summary:
Hopefully this also clarifies exactly when and why we're rewriting
certiain S_LOCALs using reference types: We're using the reference type
to stand in for a zero-offset load.
Reviewers: inglorion
Subscribers: llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37309
llvm-svn: 312247
Summary:
Some variables show up in Visual Studio as "optimized out" even in -O0
-Od builds. This change fixes two issues that would cause this to
happen. The first issue is that not all DIExpressions we generate were
recognized by the CodeView writer. This has been addressed by adding
support for DW_OP_constu, DW_OP_minus, and DW_OP_plus. The second
issue is that we had no way to encode DW_OP_deref in CodeView. We get
around that by changinge the type we encode in the debug info to be
a reference to the type in the source code.
This fixes PR34261.
The reland adds two extra checks to the original: It checks if the
DbgVariableLocation is valid before checking any of its fields, and
it only emits ranges with nonzero registers.
Reviewers: aprantl, rnk, zturner
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits, aprantl, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36907
llvm-svn: 312034
Summary:
Some variables show up in Visual Studio as "optimized out" even in -O0
-Od builds. This change fixes two issues that would cause this to
happen. The first issue is that not all DIExpressions we generate were
recognized by the CodeView writer. This has been addressed by adding
support for DW_OP_constu, DW_OP_minus, and DW_OP_plus. The second
issue is that we had no way to encode DW_OP_deref in CodeView. We get
around that by changinge the type we encode in the debug info to be
a reference to the type in the source code.
This fixes PR34261.
Reviewers: aprantl, rnk, zturner
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits, aprantl, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36907
llvm-svn: 311957
Summary:
Most DIExpressions are empty or very simple. When they are complex, they
tend to be unique, so checking them inline is reasonable.
This also avoids the need for CodeGen passes to append to the
llvm.dbg.mir named md node.
See also PR22780, for making DIExpression not be an MDNode.
Reviewers: aprantl, dexonsmith, dblaikie
Subscribers: qcolombet, javed.absar, eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37075
llvm-svn: 311594
This should enable us to test the generation of target-specific constant
pools, e.g. for ARM:
constants:
- id: 0
value: 'g(GOT_PREL)-(LPC0+8-.)'
alignment: 4
isTargetSpecific: true
I intend to use this to test PIC support in GlobalISel for ARM.
This is difficult to test outside of that context, since the existing
MIR tests usually rely on parser support as well, and that seems a bit
trickier to add. We could try to add a unit test, but the setup for that
seems rather convoluted and overkill.
We do test however that the parser reports a nice error when
encountering a target-specific constant pool.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36092
llvm-svn: 309806
On AMDGPU SGPR spills are really spilled to another register.
The spiller creates the spills to new frame index objects,
which is used as a placeholder.
This will eventually be replaced with a reference to a position
in a VGPR to write to and the frame index deleted. It is
most likely not a real stack location that can be shared
with another stack object.
This is a problem when StackSlotColoring decides it should
combine a frame index used for a normal VGPR spill with
a real stack location and a frame index used for an SGPR.
Add an ID field so that StackSlotColoring has a way
of knowing the different frame index types are
incompatible.
llvm-svn: 308673
Summary:
When an immediate is folded by constant folding, we re-scan the entire
use list for two reasons:
1. The constant folding may have created a new use of the same reg.
2. The constant folding may have removed an additional use in the list
we're currently traversing (e.g., constant folding an S_ADD_I32 c, c).
However, this could previously lead to a crash when an unrelated use was
added twice into the FoldList. Since we re-scan the whole list anyway, we
might as well just clear the FoldList again before we do so.
Using a MIR test to show this because real code seems to trigger the issue
only in connection with some really subtle control flow structures.
Fixes GL45-CTS.shading_language_420pack.binding_images on gfx9.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, llvm-commits, t-tye
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35416
llvm-svn: 308314
Summary:
This patch is the first step in reducing HW prefetcher instruction tag
collisions in inner loops for Falkor. It adds a pass that annotates IR
loads with metadata to indicate that they are known to be strided loads,
and adds a target lowering hook that translates this metadata to a
target-specific MachineMemOperand flag.
A follow on change will use this MachineMemOperand flag to re-write
instructions to reduce tag collisions.
Reviewers: mcrosier, t.p.northover
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34963
llvm-svn: 308059
Summary: Add target hooks for printing and parsing target MMO flags.
Targets may override getSerializableMachineMemOperandTargetFlags() to
return a mapping from string to flag value for target MMO values that
should be serialized/parsed in MIR output.
Add implementation of this hook for AArch64 SuppressPair MMO flag.
Reviewers: bogner, hfinkel, qcolombet, MatzeB
Subscribers: mcrosier, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34962
llvm-svn: 307877
OpenCL 2.0 introduces the notion of memory scopes in atomic operations to
global and local memory. These scopes restrict how synchronization is
achieved, which can result in improved performance.
This change extends existing notion of synchronization scopes in LLVM to
support arbitrary scopes expressed as target-specific strings, in addition to
the already defined scopes (single thread, system).
The LLVM IR and MIR syntax for expressing synchronization scopes has changed
to use *syncscope("<scope>")*, where <scope> can be "singlethread" (this
replaces *singlethread* keyword), or a target-specific name. As before, if
the scope is not specified, it defaults to CrossThread/System scope.
Implementation details:
- Mapping from synchronization scope name/string to synchronization scope id
is stored in LLVM context;
- CrossThread/System and SingleThread scopes are pre-defined to efficiently
check for known scopes without comparing strings;
- Synchronization scope names are stored in SYNC_SCOPE_NAMES_BLOCK in
the bitcode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21723
llvm-svn: 307722
Summary: Added MachineVerifier code to check register ties more thoroughly, especially so that physical registers that are tied are the same. This may help e.g. when creating MIR files.
Original patch by Jesper Antonsson
Reviewers: stoklund, sanjoy, qcolombet
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: qcolombet, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34394
llvm-svn: 307259
Aditya Nandakumar