Try to avoid mutually exclusive features. Don't use
a real default GPU, and use a fake "generic". The goal
is to make it easier to see which set of features are
incompatible between feature strings.
Most of the test changes are due to random scheduling changes
from not having a default fullspeed model.
llvm-svn: 310258
Currently the default C calling convention functions are treated
the same as compute kernels. Make this explicit so the default
calling convention can be changed to a non-kernel.
Converted with perl -pi -e 's/define void/define amdgpu_kernel void/'
on the relevant test directories (and undoing in one place that actually
wanted a non-kernel).
llvm-svn: 298444
The motivation for filling out these select-of-constants cases goes back to D24480,
where we discussed removing an IR fold from add(zext) --> select. And that goes back to:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL75531https://reviews.llvm.org/rL159230
The idea is that we should always canonicalize patterns like this to a select-of-constants
in IR because that's the smallest IR and the best for value tracking. Note that we currently
do the opposite in some cases (like the cases in *this* patch). Ie, the proposed folds in
this patch already exist in InstCombine today:
https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/master/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineSelect.cpp#L1151
As this patch shows, most targets generate better machine code for simple ext/add/not ops
rather than a select of constants. So the follow-up steps to make this less of a patchwork
of special-case folds and missing IR canonicalization:
1. Have DAGCombiner convert any select of constants into ext/add/not ops.
2 Have InstCombine canonicalize in the other direction (create more selects).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30180
llvm-svn: 296137
For some reason there are both of these available, except
for scalar 64-bit compares which only has u64. I'm not sure
why there are both (I'm guessing it's for the one bit inputs we
don't use), but for consistency always using the
unsigned one.
llvm-svn: 282832
Summary:
This includes a hazard recognizer implementation to replace some of
the hazard handling we had during frame index elimination.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: qcolombet, arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18602
llvm-svn: 268143
Matt Arsenault