Summary:
When building with modules we currently fail randomly to build LLDB's modules and get error messages like below:
```
In file included from <module-includes>:1:
In file included from llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Argument.h:18:
llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Attributes.h:74:14: fatal error: 'llvm/IR/Attributes.inc' file not found
#include "llvm/IR/Attributes.inc"
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
...
In file included from llvm-project/lldb/source/Plugins/ABI/SysV-arm/ABISysV_arm.cpp:9:
llvm-project/lldb/source/Plugins/ABI/SysV-arm/ABISysV_arm.h:12:10: fatal error: could not build module 'lldb_Wrapper'
```
The reason for this is that our source files can include Clang headers which in turn include files like Attributes.inc which
are generated by intrinsics_gen. However, it seems Clang can't express this dependency in its CMake code, so intrinsics_gen
is actually not guaranteed to be built before we start parsing LLDB source files and Clang headers. Clang worked around this
by letting all libraries depend on intrinsics_gen, which at least lets their builds pass.
As I haven't figured out how to solve these dependencies properly and I want to get the LLDB+Modules build green,
I suggest we copy Clang's hack until we figure out how to get Clang's dependencies right.
Reviewers: sgraenitz, aprantl, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, mgrang, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66208
llvm-svn: 368975
assume_safety implies that loads under "if's" can be safely executed
speculatively (unguarded, unmasked). However this assumption holds only for the
original user "if's", not those introduced by the compiler, such as the
fold-tail "if" that guards us from loading beyond the original loop trip-count.
Currently the combination of fold-tail and assume-safety pragmas results in
ignoring the fold-tail predicate that guards the loads, generating unmasked
loads. This patch fixes this behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66106
Reviewers: Ayal, hsaito, fhahn
llvm-svn: 368973
We already had the pattern for just the scalar to vector and bitcast,
but not the case where we wanted zeroes in the high half of the xmm.
llvm-svn: 368972
New pragma "vectorize_predicate(enable)" now implies "vectorize(enable)",
and it is ignored when vectorization is disabled with e.g.
"vectorize(disable) vectorize_predicate(enable)".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65776
llvm-svn: 368970
fp_to_sint is turned into X86cvttp2si during isel preprocessing.
The other redundant isel patterns were removed previously, but I
missed this one because its in the MMX td file.
llvm-svn: 368968
Now that LLVM moved to C++14, `COMPILER_RT_HAS_STD_CXX11_FLAG` should
become `COMPILER_RT_HAS_STD_CXX14_FLAG`.
I ran into this issue when replacing llvm::make_unique with
std::make_unique in an X-ray unit test. We are correctly passing
`-std=c++14`, but this got overwritten further down the invocation by
the compiler-rt flags. Given that this unit test is using LLVM headers,
this is bound to break sooner than later, regardless of my change.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66271
llvm-svn: 368960
The change in r368681 contains a (probably unintentional) behavioral change for
rewrite rules with a single matcher. Previously, the single matcher would not
need to be bound (`joinCaseMatchers` returned it directly), even though a final
DynTypeMatcher was created and bound by `buildMatcher`. With the new change, a
single matcher will be bound, in addition to the final binding (which is now in
`buildMatchers`, but happens roughly at the same point in the overall flow).
This patch simply duplicates the "final matcher" trick: it creates an extra
DynTypedMatcher for each rewrite rule case matcher, and unconditionally makes it
bindable. This is probably not the right long-term fix, but it does allow
existing code to continue to work with this interface.
Subscribers: cfe-commits, gribozavr, ymandel
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66273
llvm-svn: 368958
Remove the @return to fix the warning: '@returns' command used in a
comment that is attached to a function returning void [-Wdocumentation]
llvm-svn: 368957
If the width is 256 bits, then we must have AVX so the else here
was unnecessary. Once that's removed then the >= 256 bit code is
identical to the 128 bit code with a different VT so combine them.
llvm-svn: 368956
The X-ray unit tests in compiler-rt are overriding the C++ version by
explicitly passing -std=c++11 in the compiler invocation. This poses a
problem as these tests are including LLVM headers that can now use C++14
features. I'm temporarily reverting this as I investigate the correct
solution.
llvm-svn: 368952
Summary:
Some compilers require that const fields of an object must be explicitly
initialized by the constructor. I ran into this issue building with clang
3.8 on Ubuntu 16.04.
Reviewers: compnerd, Szelethus, NoQ
Subscribers: cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66265
llvm-svn: 368950
Summary:
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36578 and https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36296.
Supersedes: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55966
One of the fundamental transformation that CoroSplit pass performs before splitting the coroutine is to find which values need to survive between suspend and resume and provide a slot for them in the coroutine frame to spill and restore the value as needed.
Coroutine frame becomes available once the storage for it was allocated and that point is marked in the pre-split coroutine with a llvm.coro.begin intrinsic.
FE normally puts all of the user-authored code that would be accessing those values after llvm.coro.begin, however, sometimes instructions accessing those values would end up prior to coro.begin. For example, writing out a value of the parameter into the alloca done by the FE or instructions that are added by the optimization passes such as SROA when it rewrites allocas.
Prior to this change, CoroSplit pass would try to move instructions that may end up accessing the values in the coroutine frame after CoroBegin. However it would run into problems (report_fatal_error) if some of the values would be used both in the allocation function (for example allocator is passed as a parameter to a coroutine) and in the use-authored body of the coroutine.
To handle this case and to simplify the instruction moving logic, this change removes all of the instruction moving. Instead, we only change the uses of the spilled values that are dominated by coro.begin and leave other instructions intact.
Before:
```
%var = alloca i32
%1 = getelementptr .. %var; ; will move this one after coro.begin
%f = call i8* @llvm.coro.begin(
```
After:
```
%var = alloca i32
%1 = getelementptr .. %var; stays put
%f = call i8* @llvm.coro.begin(
```
If we discover that there is a potential write into an alloca, prior to coro.begin we would copy its value from the alloca into the spill slot in the coroutine frame.
Before:
```
%var = alloca i32
store .. %var ; will move this one after coro.begin
%f = call i8* @llvm.coro.begin(
```
After:
```
%var = alloca i32
store .. %var ;stays put
%f = call i8* @llvm.coro.begin(
%tmp = load %var
store %tmp, %spill.slot.for.var
```
Note: This change does not handle array allocas as that is something that C++ FE does not produce, but, it can be added in the future if need arises
Reviewers: llvm-commits, modocache, ben-clayton, tks2103, rjmccall
Reviewed By: modocache
Subscribers: bartdesmet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66230
llvm-svn: 368949
On Darwin, we currently use forkpty to communicate with the "atos"
symbolizer. There are several problems that fork[pty] has, e.g. that
after fork, interceptors are still active and this sometimes causes
crashes or hangs. This is especially problematic for TSan, which uses
interceptors for OS-provided locks and mutexes, and even Libc functions
use those.
This patch replaces forkpty with posix_spawn on Darwin. Since
posix_spawn doesn't fork (at least on Darwin), the interceptors are not
a problem. Another benefit is that we'll handle post-fork failures (e.g.
sandbox disallows "exec") gracefully now.
Related revisions and previous attempts that were blocked by or had to
be revered due to test failures:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D48451https://reviews.llvm.org/D40032
Reviewed By: kubamracek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65253
llvm-svn: 368947
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368946
Summary: This exposes `CallInst`'s tail call kind via new `LLVMGetTailCallKind` and `LLVMSetTailCallKind` functions. The motivation for this is to be able to see `musttail` for languages that require mandatory tail calls for correctness. Today only the weaker `LLVMSetTail` is exposed and there is no way to set `GuaranteedTailCallOpt` via the C API.
Reviewers: CodaFi, jyknight, deadalnix, rnk
Reviewed By: CodaFi
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66061
llvm-svn: 368945
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368944
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368942
When handling a member access into a non-class, non-ObjC-object type, we
would perform a lookup into the surrounding scope as if for an
unqualified lookup. If the member access was followed by a '<' and this
lookup (or the typo-correction for it) found a template name, we'd treat
the member access as naming that template.
Now we treat such accesses as never naming a template if the type of the
object expression is of vector type, so that vector component accesses
are never misinterpreted as naming something else. This is not entirely
correct, since it is in fact valid to name a template from the enclosing
scope in this context, when invoking a pseudo-destructor for the vector
type via an alias template, but that's very much a corner case, and this
change leaves that case only as broken as the corresponding case for
Objective-C types is.
This incidentally adds support for dr2292, which permits a 'template'
keyword at the start of a member access naming a pseudo-destructor.
llvm-svn: 368940
Summary:
Currently the heuristic used in ClangASTContext::CreateRecordType to identify an anonymous class is that there is that name is a nullptr or simply a null terminator. This heuristic is not accurate since it will also sweep up unnamed classes and lambdas. The improved heuristic relies on the requirement that an anonymous class must be contained within a class.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66175
llvm-svn: 368937
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368936
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368935
Summary: This modification was put in place so the `ReduceMetadata` pass doesn't have to consider debug functions
Reviewers: dblaikie
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66257
llvm-svn: 368934
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368933
Summary:
Instead of constantly keeping track of the nonnull status with the
dereferenceable information we can simply query the nonnull attribute
whenever we need the information (debug + manifest).
Reviewers: sstefan1, uenoku
Subscribers: hiraditya, bollu, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66113
llvm-svn: 368924
Sjoerd Meijer