type-name is looked up in the context of the complete postfix-expression. Don't
forget to pass the scope into this lookup when the type-name is a template-id;
it might name an alias template which can't be found within the class itself.
Bug spotted by Johannes Schaub on #llvm.
llvm-svn: 168011
too. Fixes PR7900.
While I'm in this area, improve the diagnostic when the type being
destroyed doesn't match either of the types we found.
llvm-svn: 127041
pseudo-destructor expressions, and builds the CXXPseudoDestructorExpr
node directly. Currently, this only affects pseudo-destructor
expressions when they are parsed, but not after template
instantiation. That's coming next...
Improve parsing of pseudo-destructor-names. When parsing the
nested-name-specifier and we hit the sequence of tokens X :: ~, query
the actual module to determine whether X is a type-name (in which case
the X :: is part of the pseudo-destructor-name but not the
nested-name-specifier) or not (in which case the X :: is part of the
nested-name-specifier).
llvm-svn: 97058
C++98/03 and C++0x, since the '0x semantics break valid C++98/03
code. This new mess is tracked by core issue 399, which is still
unresolved.
Fixes PR6358 and PR6359.
llvm-svn: 96836
typedef int Int;
int *p;
p->Int::~Int();
This weakens the invariant that the only types in nested-name-specifiers are tag types (restricted to class types in C++98/03). However, we weaken this invariant as little as possible, accepting arbitrary types in nested-name-specifiers only when we're in a member access expression that looks like a pseudo-destructor expression.
llvm-svn: 96743
figure out how not to break lots of code using this. See PR6358 and PR6359 for
motivating examples. FIXME's left in the code and the test.
llvm-svn: 96733
now cope with the destruction of types named as dependent templates,
e.g.,
y->template Y<T>::~Y()
Nominally, we implement C++0x [basic.lookup.qual]p6. However, we don't
follow the letter of the standard here because that would fail to
parse
template<typename T, typename U>
X0<T, U>::~X0() { }
properly. The problem is captured in core issue 339, which gives some
(but not enough!) guidance. I expect to revisit this code when the
resolution of 339 is clear, and/or we start capturing better source
information for DeclarationNames.
Fixes PR6152.
llvm-svn: 96367
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
name 'T' is looked up in the expression
t.~T()
Previously, we weren't looking into the type of "t", and therefore
would fail when T actually referred to an injected-class-name. Fixes
PR5530.
llvm-svn: 89493
formed without a trailing '(', diagnose the error (these expressions
must be immediately called), emit a fix-it hint, and fix the code.
llvm-svn: 81015
expressions, e.g.,
p->~T()
when p is a pointer to a scalar type.
We don't currently diagnose errors when pseudo-destructor expressions
are used in any way other than by forming a call.
llvm-svn: 81009
Eric Christopher