Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Evan Cheng eae6d2ccea LLVM sdisel normalize bit extraction of the form:
((x & 0xff00) >> 8) << 2
to
 (x >> 6) & 0x3fc

This is general goodness since it folds a left shift into the mask. However,
the trailing zeros in the mask prevents the ARM backend from using the bit
extraction instructions. And worse since the mask materialization may require
an addition instruction. This comes up fairly frequently when the result of 
the bit twiddling is used as memory address. e.g.

 = ptr[(x & 0xFF0000) >> 16]

We want to generate:
  ubfx   r3, r1, #16, #8
  ldr.w  r3, [r0, r3, lsl #2]

vs.
  mov.w  r9, #1020
  and.w  r2, r9, r1, lsr #14
  ldr    r2, [r0, r2]

Add a late ARM specific isel optimization to
ARMDAGToDAGISel::PreprocessISelDAG(). It folds the left shift to the
'base + offset' address computation; change the mask to one which doesn't have
trailing zeros and enable the use of ubfx.

Note the optimization has to be done late since it's target specific and we
don't want to change the DAG normalization. It's also fairly restrictive
as shifter operands are not always free. It's only done for lsh 1 / 2. It's
known to be free on some cpus and they are most common for address
computation.

This is a slight win for blowfish, rijndael, etc.

rdar://12870177

llvm-svn: 170581
2012-12-19 20:16:09 +00:00
Evan Cheng 8b2bda09a5 Change some ARM subtarget features to be single bit yes/no in order to sink them down to MC layer. Also fix tests.
llvm-svn: 134590
2011-07-07 03:55:05 +00:00
Jim Grosbach 825cb299cd Update ARM DAGtoDAG for matching UBFX instruction for unsigned bitfield
extraction. This fixes PR5998.

llvm-svn: 102144
2010-04-22 23:24:18 +00:00