This is needed when running the tests in Freestanding mode, where main()
isn't treated specially. In Freestanding, main() doesn't get mangled as
extern "C", so whatever runtime we're using fails to find the entry point.
One way to solve this problem is to define a symbol alias from __Z4mainiPPc
to _main, however this requires all definitions of main() to have the same
mangling. Hence this commit.
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.
This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
The tests were disabled under ASAN/MSAN because old Clangs were very
slow to build the test cases. However, I checked with the Clang used
on our build bots and the tests are not slow to build anymore, so the
tests can be re-enabled.
Summary:
pr42199
When using regex_constants::match_prev_avail, it is defined that
--first is valid, and match_not_bol and match_not_bow should be
ignored. At the moment these flags are not ignored. This fixis that.
Reviewers: ldionne, miyuki, EricWF, mclow.lists, #libc
Reviewed By: ldionne, miyuki, #libc
Subscribers: broadwaylamb, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75622
Tests that require support for Clang-verify are already marked as such
explicitly by their extension, which is .verify.cpp. Requiring the use
of an explicit Lit feature is, after thought, not really helpful.
This is a change in design: we have been bitten in the past by tests not
being enabled when we thought they were. However, the issue was mostly
with file extensions being ignored. The fix for that is not to blindly
require explicit features all the time, but instead to report all files
that are in the suite but that don't match any known test format. This
can be implemented in a follow-up patch.
Instead of having different names for the same Lit feature accross code
bases, use the same name everywhere. This NFC commit is in preparation
for a refactor where all three projects will be using the same Lit
feature detection logic, and hence it won't be convenient to use
different names for the feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78370
By renaming .fail.cpp tests that don't need clang-verify to .compile.fail.cpp,
the new test format will not try to compile these tests with clang-verify,
and the old test format will work just the same. However, this allows
removing a workaround that requires parsing each test looking for
clang-verify markup.
After this change, a .fail.cpp test should always have clang-verify markup.
When clang-verify is not supported by the compiler, we will just check that
these tests fail to compile. When clang-verify is supported, these tests
will be compiled with clang-verify whether they have markup or not (so
they should have markup, or they will fail).
This simplifies the test suite and also ensures that all of our .fail.cpp
tests provide clang-verify markup. If it's impossible for a test to have
clang-verify markup, it can be moved to a .compile.fail.cpp test, which
are unconditionally just checked for compilation failure.
The libc++ test suite has a lot of old Lit features used to XFAIL tests
and mark them as UNSUPPORTED. Many of them are to workaround problems on
old compilers or old platforms. As time goes by, it is good to go and
clean those up to simplify the configuration of the test suite, and also
to reflect the testing reality. It's not useful to have markup that gives
the impression that e.g. clang-3.3 is supported, when we don't really
test on it anymore (and hence several new tests probably don't have the
necessary markup on them).
The testing script used to test libc++ historically did not like directories
without any testing files, so these tests had been added. Since this is
not necessary anymore, we can now remove these files. This has the benefit
that the total number of tests reflects the real number of tests more
closely, and we also skip some unnecessary work (especially relevant when
running tests over SSH).
However, some nothing_to_do.pass.cpp tests actually serve the purpose of
documenting that an area of the Standard doesn't need to be tested, or is
tested elsewhere. These files are not removed by this commit.
Removal done with:
import os
import itertools
for (dirpath, dirnames, filenames) in itertools.chain(os.walk('./libcxx/test'),
os.walk('./libcxxabi/test')):
if len(filenames + dirnames) > 1 and \
any(p == 'nothing_to_do.pass.cpp' for p in filenames):
os.remove(os.path.join(dirpath, 'nothing_to_do.pass.cpp'))
Forcing -Werror and other warnings means that the test suite isn't
actually testing what most people are seeing in their code -- it seems
better and less arbitrary to compile these tests as close as possible
to the compiler default instead.
Removing -Werror also means that we get to differentiate between
diagnostics that are errors and those that are warnings, which makes
the test suite more precise.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76311
Some tests do not fail at all when -verify is not supported, unless some
arbitrary warning flag is added to make them fail. We currently used
-Werror=unused-result to make them fail, but doing so makes the test
suite a lot more inscrutable. It seems better to just disable those
tests when -verify is not supported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76256
This patch enables throwing exceptions for invalid backreferences
in the constructor when using the basic, extended, grep, or egrep grammar.
This fixes bug 34297.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62453
The regex backreferences were not properly parsed and used when using
the extended grammar. This change parses them. The issue was found while
working on PR34297.
Thanks to Mark de Wever for the patch!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62451
This was reported as part of a bug report that ended up being a
duplicate for r340609, but I'm adding the test case since it's
ever so slightly different from what we had before.
llvm-svn: 370109
This commit adds tests that repeated characters in regular expressions
are within numeric limits, and that a <= b in a regex like `x{a,b}`.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62816
llvm-svn: 362525
Linux is failing even though the test runner does report this locale
is available, but the test still isn't expected to work on platforms
without the locale (like Android).
llvm-svn: 359726
The standard requires the following for the std::regex_constants::error_type
values: "The type error_type is an implementation-defined enumerated type."
The values of this enumerated type are not required to be non-zero.
This patch makes such checks in tests libc++-specific to let the tests
pass for other conforming implementations.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61195
llvm-svn: 359320
Some tests #include <iostream> but they don't use anything from the
header. Those are probably artifacts of when the tests were developped.
llvm-svn: 357181
Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".
Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:
In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:
self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']
Run the tests and they all fail.
Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).
Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.
The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.
The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:
https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed
This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.
Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.
<rdar://problem/47754795>
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624
llvm-svn: 353086
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
There were 3 tests with 'int main(void)', and 6 with the return type on a different line. I'm about to send a patch for main in tests, and this NFC change is unrelated.
llvm-svn: 350770
That test doesn't fail anymore since r349378, since the assertions that
r349378 removed must have been bugs in the dylib at some point.
llvm-svn: 349484
Add a target_info definition for NetBSD. The definition is based
on the one used by FreeBSD, with libcxxrt replaced by libc++abi,
and using llvm-libunwind since we need to use its unwinder
implementation to build anyway.
Additionally, XFAIL the 30 tests that fail because of non-implemented
locale features. According to the manual, NetBSD implements only
LC_CTYPE part of locale handling. However, there is a locale database
in the system and locale specifications are validated against it,
so it makes sense to list the common locales as supported.
If I'm counting correctly, this change enables additional 43 passing
tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55767
llvm-svn: 349379
Remove the two test cases for \xDA and \xFA with UTF-8 locale, as both
characters alone are invalid in UTF-8 (short sequences). Upon removing
them, the test passes on Linux again (and also on NetBSD, after adding
appropriate locale configuration).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55746
llvm-svn: 349378
Summary:
Some tests (mainly the new C++20 calendar library) fail when libc++ is
tested with '--param=std=c++98'. The failures happen because the tests
actually don't support C++98, but don't mention C++98 in the
'UNSUPPORTED:' line.
This change fixes the issue.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, ldionne
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: arphaman, michaelplatings, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53640
llvm-svn: 345148
Summary:
This commit fixes a regression introduced in r316095, where we don't match
inverted character classes when there's no negated characrers in the []'s.
rdar://problem/43060054
Reviewers: mclow.lists, timshen, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50534
llvm-svn: 340609
Summary:
Currently when a regular expression contains an invalid character
class name std::regex constructors throw an std::regex_error with
std::regex_constants::error_brack code.
This patch changes the code to std::regex_constants::error_ctype and
adds a test.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42291
llvm-svn: 323322
Louis Dionne