We've stopped doing it in libc++ for a while now because these names
would end up rotting as we move things around and copy/paste stuff.
This cleans up all the existing files so as to stop the spreading
as people copy-paste headers around.
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
The language standard does not define a function with this name,
so it is part of the user's namespace. This change fixes a duplicate
symbol error that occurs when a user attempts to define a function
with this name.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42405
llvm-svn: 323237
Summary:
This patch refactors and tries to remove as much of the Windows support headers as possible. This is needed because they currently introduce super weird include cycles and dependencies between STL and libc headers.
The changes in this patch are:
* remove `support/win32/support.h` completely. The required parts have either been moved into `support/win32/msvc_support.h` (for `MSVC` only helpers not needed by Clang), or directly into their respective `foo.h` headers.
* Combine `locale_win32.h` and `locale_mgmt_win32.h` into a single headers, this header should only be included within `__locale` or `locale` to avoid include cycles.
* Remove the unneeded parts of `limits_win32.h` and re-name it to `limits_msvc_win32.h` since it's only needed by Clang.
I've tested this patch using Clang on Windows, but I suspect it might technically regress our non-existent support for MSVC. Is somebody able to double check?
This refactor is needed to support upcoming fixes to `<locale>` on Windows.
Reviewers: bcraig, rmaprath, compnerd, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: majnemer, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32988
llvm-svn: 302727
Arthur O'Dwyer