This results in things such as
vmovups 16(%rdi), %xmm0
vinsertf128 $1, %xmm0, %ymm0, %ymm0
to be combined to
vinsertf128 $1, 16(%rdi), %ymm0, %ymm0
rdar://11076953
llvm-svn: 153092
X86InstrCompiler.td.
It also adds –mcpu-generic to the legalize-shift-64.ll test so the test
will pass if run on an Intel Atom CPU, which would otherwise
produce an instruction schedule which differs from that which the test expects.
llvm-svn: 153033
This results in things such as
vmovaps -96(%rbx), %xmm1
vinsertf128 $1, %xmm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
to be combined to
vinsertf128 $1, -96(%rbx), %ymm0, %ymm0
rdar://10643481
llvm-svn: 152762
Original commit message from r147481:
DAGCombine for transforming 128->256 casts into a vmovaps, rather
then a vxorps + vinsertf128 pair if the original vector came from a load.
Fix:
Unaligned loads need to generate a vmovups.
rdar://10974078
llvm-svn: 152366
Specifically, remove the magic number when checking to see if the copy has a
glue operand and simplify the checking logic.
rdar://10930395
llvm-svn: 152041
In this instance we are generating the tail-call during legalizeDAG. The 2nd
floor call can't be a tail call because it clobbers %xmm1, which is defined by
the first floor call. The first floor call can't be a tail-call because it's
not in the tail position. The only reasonable way I could think to fix this
in a target-independent manner was to check for glue logic on the copy reg.
rdar://10930395
llvm-svn: 151877
the processor keeps a return addresses stack (RAS) which stores the address
and the instruction execution state of the instruction after a function-call
type branch instruction.
Calling a "noreturn" function with normal call instructions (e.g. bl) can
corrupt RAS and causes 100% return misprediction so LLVM should use a
unconditional branch instead. i.e.
mov lr, pc
b _foo
The "mov lr, pc" is issued in order to get proper backtrace.
rdar://8979299
llvm-svn: 151623
[Joe Groff] Hi everyone. My previous patch applied as r151382 had a few problems:
Clang raised a warning, and X86 LowerOperation would assert out for
fptoui f64 to i32 because it improperly lowered to an illegal
BUILD_PAIR. Here's a patch that addresses these issues. Let me know if
any other changes are necessary. Thanks.
llvm-svn: 151432
rdar://10873652
As part of this I updated the llvm-mc disassembler C API to always call the
SymbolLookUp call back even if there is no getOpInfo call back. If there is a
getOpInfo call back that is tried first and then if that gets no information
then the SymbolLookUp is called. I also made the code more robust by
memset(3)'ing to zero the LLVMOpInfo1 struct before then setting
SymbolicOp.Value before for the call to getOpInfo. And also don't use any
values from the LLVMOpInfo1 struct if getOpInfo returns 0. And also don't
use any of the ReferenceType or ReferenceName values from SymbolLookUp if it
returns NULL. rdar://10873563 and rdar://10873683
For the X86 target also fixed bugs so the annotations get printed.
Also fixed a few places in the ARM target that was not producing symbolic
operands for some instructions. rdar://10878166
llvm-svn: 151267
Craig Topper