Summary:
The value operand in DW_OP_plus_uconst/DW_OP_constu value can be
large (it uses uint64_t as representation internally in LLVM).
This means that in the uint64_t to int conversions, previously done
by DwarfExpression::addMachineRegExpression, could lose information.
Also, the negation done in "-Offset" was undefined behavior in case
Offset was exactly INT_MIN.
To avoid the above problems, we now avoid transformation like
[Reg, DW_OP_plus_uconst, Offset] --> [DW_OP_breg, Offset]
and
[Reg, DW_OP_constu, Offset, DW_OP_plus] --> [DW_OP_breg, Offset]
when Offset > INT_MAX.
And we avoid to transform
[Reg, DW_OP_constu, Offset, DW_OP_minus] --> [DW_OP_breg,-Offset]
when Offset > INT_MAX+1.
The patch also adjusts DwarfCompileUnit::constructVariableDIEImpl
to make sure that "DW_OP_constu, Offset, DW_OP_minus" is used
instead of "DW_OP_plus_uconst, Offset" when creating DIExpressions
with negative frame index offsets.
Notice that this might just be the tip of the iceberg. There
are lots of fishy handling related to these constants. I think both
DIExpression::appendOffset and DIExpression::extractIfOffset may
trigger undefined behavior for certain values.
Reviewers: sdesmalen, rnk, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: jholewinski, aprantl, hiraditya, ychen, uabelho, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67263
llvm-svn: 371304
This currently triggers undefined behavior if executed with an
ubsan build. It is just a precommit of the test case to show that
we got a problem.
Fix is proposed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D67263 and plan is to
commit the fix directly after this patch.
llvm-svn: 371303
Bjorn Pettersson