Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
llvm-svn: 369013
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
For the _WIN32 macro, it is the definedness that matters rather than
the value. Most uses of the macro already rely on the definedness.
This commit fixes the few remaining uses that relied on the value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51105
llvm-svn: 340520
See r331124 for how I made a list of files missing the include.
I then ran this Python script:
for f in open('filelist.txt'):
f = f.strip()
fl = open(f).readlines()
found = False
for i in xrange(len(fl)):
p = '#include "llvm/'
if not fl[i].startswith(p):
continue
if fl[i][len(p):] > 'Config':
fl.insert(i, '#include "llvm/Config/llvm-config.h"\n')
found = True
break
if not found:
print 'not found', f
else:
open(f, 'w').write(''.join(fl))
and then looked through everything with `svn diff | diffstat -l | xargs -n 1000 gvim -p`
and tried to fix include ordering and whatnot.
No intended behavior change.
llvm-svn: 331184
LLVM_ON_WIN32 is set exactly with MSVC and MinGW (but not Cygwin) in
HandleLLVMOptions.cmake, which is where _WIN32 defined too. Just use the
default macro instead of a reinvented one.
See thread "Replacing LLVM_ON_WIN32 with just _WIN32" on llvm-dev and cfe-dev.
No intended behavior change.
This moves over all uses of the macro, but doesn't remove the definition
of it in (llvm-)config.h yet.
llvm-svn: 331127
The main goal of this change is to make it much easier to track which
rules are actually covered by Testgen'erated regression tests.
Reviewers: aemerson, dsanders
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46095
llvm-svn: 330988
The CodeGenCoverage.h header is installed, but it references
the build-only header "llvm/Config/config.h". This breaks use
of the CodeGenCoverage.h header once it is installed, because config.h isn't
available.
This patch fixes the error by moving the config.h include from
the CodeGenCoverage.h header (where it's not needed), to the
CodeGenCoverage.cpp source file.
llvm-svn: 318602
It turns out this #include isn't used from Host.h anyway,
but by having it it causes circular include dependencies.
This issues only surfaced while I was working on a separate
patch, so I'm submitting this first so that it's independent
of the other, unrelated patch.
llvm-svn: 318489
Summary:
This patch adds a LLVM_ENABLE_GISEL_COV which, like LLVM_ENABLE_DAGISEL_COV,
causes TableGen to instrument the generated table to collect rule coverage
information. However, LLVM_ENABLE_GISEL_COV goes a bit further than
LLVM_ENABLE_DAGISEL_COV. The information is written to files
(${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/gisel-coverage-* by default). These files can then be
concatenated into ${LLVM_GISEL_COV_PREFIX}-all after which TableGen will
read this information and use it to emit warnings about untested rules.
This technique could also be used by SelectionDAG and can be further
extended to detect hot rules and give them priority over colder rules.
Usage:
* Enable LLVM_ENABLE_GISEL_COV in CMake
* Build the compiler and run some tests
* cat gisel-coverage-[0-9]* > gisel-coverage-all
* Delete lib/Target/*/*GenGlobalISel.inc*
* Build the compiler
Known issues:
* ${LLVM_GISEL_COV_PREFIX}-all must be generated as a manual
step due to a lack of a portable 'cat' command. It should be the
concatenation of all ${LLVM_GISEL_COV_PREFIX}-[0-9]* files.
* There's no mechanism to discard coverage information when the ruleset
changes
Depends on D39742
Reviewers: ab, qcolombet, t.p.northover, aditya_nandakumar, rovka
Reviewed By: rovka
Subscribers: vsk, arsenm, nhaehnle, mgorny, kristof.beyls, javed.absar, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39747
llvm-svn: 318356
Sergej Jaskiewicz