Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368944
Before the patch calling clang-tidy with -header-filter=.* -system-headers would
result in a few hundred useless warnings:
warning: macro '_GNU_SOURCE' used to declare a constant; consider using a 'constexpr' constant [cppcoreguidelines-macro-usage]
warning: macro '_LP64' used to declare a constant; consider using a 'constexpr' constant [cppcoreguidelines-macro-usage]
warning: macro '__ATOMIC_ACQUIRE' used to declare a constant; consider using a 'constexpr' constant [cppcoreguidelines-macro-usage]
warning: macro '__ATOMIC_ACQ_REL' used to declare a constant; consider using a 'constexpr' constant [cppcoreguidelines-macro-usage]
warning: macro '__ATOMIC_CONSUME' used to declare a constant; consider using a 'constexpr' constant [cppcoreguidelines-macro-usage]
warning: macro '__ATOMIC_RELAXED' used to declare a constant; consider using a 'constexpr' constant [cppcoreguidelines-macro-usage]
warning: macro '__ATOMIC_RELEASE' used to declare a constant; consider using a 'constexpr' constant [cppcoreguidelines-macro-usage]
warning: macro '__ATOMIC_SEQ_CST' used to declare a constant; consider using a 'constexpr' constant [cppcoreguidelines-macro-usage]
warning: macro '__BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__' used to declare a constant; consider using a 'constexpr' constant [cppcoreguidelines-macro-usage]
... and so on
llvm-svn: 358621
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Removed the uses of the allOf() matcher inside node matchers that are implicit
allOf(). Replaced uses of allOf() with the explicit node matcher where it makes
matchers more readable. Replace anyOf(hasName(), hasName(), ...) with the more
efficient and readable hasAnyName().
llvm-svn: 347520
Summary:
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39224 | PR39224 ]]
As discussed, we can't always do the transform automatically due to that array-to-pointer decay of C array.
In order to detect whether we can do said transform, we'd need to be able to see all usages of said array,
which is, i would say, rather impossible if e.g. it is in the header.
Thus right now no fixit exists.
Exceptions: `extern "C"` code.
References:
* [[ https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#es27-use-stdarray-or-stack_array-for-arrays-on-the-stack | CPPCG ES.27: Use std::array or stack_array for arrays on the stack ]]
* [[ https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#slcon1-prefer-using-stl-array-or-vector-instead-of-a-c-array | CPPCG SL.con.1: Prefer using STL array or vector instead of a C array ]]
* HICPP `4.1.1 Ensure that a function argument does not undergo an array-to-pointer conversion`
* MISRA `5-2-12 An identifier with array type passed as a function argument shall not decay to a pointer`
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, JonasToth, alexfh, hokein, xazax.hun
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53771
llvm-svn: 346835
Summary:
The fix to the issue that `const char* p = ("foo")` is diagnosed as decay
is to ignored the ParenCast.
Resolves PR39583
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, hokein
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: nemanjai, xazax.hun, kbarton, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54281
llvm-svn: 346555
Summary:
The macro may not have location (or more generally, the location may not exist),
e.g. if it originates from compiler's command-line.
The check complains on all the macros, even those without the location info.
Which means, it only says it does not like it. What is 'it'? I have no idea.
If we don't print the name, then there is no way to deal with that situation.
And in general, not printing name here forces the user to try to understand,
given, the macro definition location, what is the macro name?
This isn't fun.
Also, ignores-by-default the macros originating from command-line,
with an option to not ignore those.
I suspect some more issues may crop up later.
Reviewers: JonasToth, aaron.ballman, hokein, xazax.hun, alexfh
Reviewed By: JonasToth, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: nemanjai, kbarton, rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53817
llvm-svn: 345610
Summary:
This patch is a small refactoring necessary for
'readability-isolate-declaration' and does not introduce functional changes.
It allows to use the utility functions without a full `ASTContext` and requires only the `SourceManager` and the `LangOpts`.
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, hokein
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: nemanjai, xazax.hun, kbarton, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52684
llvm-svn: 343850
Summary:
The cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-pointer-arithmetic warns on all occassion where
pointer arithmetic is used, but does not check values where the pointer types
is deduced via `auto`. This patch adjusts this behaviour and solved
PR36489.
I accidentally commited a wrong patch, this Differential is meant to have a
correct revision description and code attached to it.
Because the patch was accepted by aaron.ballman already, i will just commit
it.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D48717 for the old differntial (contains wrong
code from the mixup)
Subscribers: nemanjai, xazax.hun, kbarton, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49682
llvm-svn: 337716
Summary:
Checks for narrowing conversions, e.g.
int i = 0;
i += 0.1;
This has what some might consider false positives for:
i += ceil(d);
Reviewers: alexfh, hokein
Subscribers: srhines, nemanjai, mgorny, JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, kbarton
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38455
llvm-svn: 333066
Summary:
C++2a allows bitfields to have default member initializers.
Add support for this to clang-tidy's cppcoreguidelines-pro-type-member-init check.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: klimek, nemanjai, xazax.hun, kbarton, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42426
llvm-svn: 323227
The usage of `goto` is discourage in C++ since forever. This check implements
a warning for every `goto`. Even though there are (rare) valid use cases for
`goto`, better high level constructs should be used.
`goto` is used sometimes in C programs to free resources at the end of
functions in the case of errors. This pattern is better implemented with
RAII in C++.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, hokein
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, jbcoe, Eugene.Zelenko, klimek, nemanjai, mgorny, xazax.hun, kbarton, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41815
llvm-svn: 322626
Summary:
This patch introduces support for legacy C-style resource functions that must obey
the 'owner<>' semantics.
- added legacy creators like malloc,fopen,...
- added legacy consumers like free,fclose,...
This helps codes that mostly benefit from owner:
Legacy, C-Style code that isn't feasable to port directly to RAII but needs a step in between
to identify actual resource management and just using the resources.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, hokein
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: nemanjai, JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, kbarton
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38396
llvm-svn: 316092
This patch introduces a note for variable declaration that are later deleted.
Adds FIXME notes for possible automatic type-rewriting positions as well.
Reviewed by aaron.ballman
Differential: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38411
llvm-svn: 314913
This check implements the typebased semantic of `gsl::owner`.
Meaning, that
- only `gsl::owner` is allowed to get `delete`d
- `new` expression must be assigned to `gsl::owner`
- function calls that expect `gsl::owner` as argument, must get either an owner
or a newly created and recognized resource (in the moment only `new`ed memory)
- assignment to `gsl::owner` must be either a resource or another owner
- functions returning an `gsl::owner` are considered as factories, and their result
must be assigned to an `gsl::owner`
- classes that have an `gsl::owner`-member must declare a non-default destructor
There are some problems that occur when typededuction is in place.
For example `auto Var = function_that_returns_owner();` the type of `Var` will not be
an `gsl::owner`. This case is catched, and explicitly noted.
But cases like fully templated functions
```
template <typename T>
void f(T t) { delete t; }
// ...
f(gsl::owner<int*>(new int(42)));
```
Will created false positive (the deletion is problematic), since the type deduction
removes the wrapping `typeAlias`.
Codereview in D36354
llvm-svn: 313067
This check implements the typebased semantic of `gsl::owner`.
Meaning, that
- only `gsl::owner` is allowed to get `delete`d
- `new` expression must be assigned to `gsl::owner`
- function calls that expect `gsl::owner` as argument, must get either an owner
or a newly created and recognized resource (in the moment only `new`ed memory)
- assignment to `gsl::owner` must be either a resource or another owner
- functions returning an `gsl::owner` are considered as factories, and their result
must be assigned to an `gsl::owner`
- classes that have an `gsl::owner`-member must declare a non-default destructor
There are some problems that occur when typededuction is in place.
For example `auto Var = function_that_returns_owner();` the type of `Var` will not be
an `gsl::owner`. This case is catched, and explicitly noted.
But cases like fully templated functions
```
template <typename T>
void f(T t) { delete t; }
// ...
f(gsl::owner<int*>(new int(42)));
```
Will created false positive (the deletion is problematic), since the type deduction
removes the wrapping `typeAlias`.
Please give your comments :)
llvm-svn: 313043
ADL as reasonable extension points.
All of this would be cleaner if this code followed the more usual LLVM
convention of not having deeply nested namespaces inside of .cpp files
and instead having a `using namespace ...;` at the top. Then the static
function would be in the global namespace and easily referred to as
`::join`. Instead we have to write a fairly contrived qualified name.
I figure the authors can clean this up with a less ambiguous name, using
the newly provided LLVM `join` function, or any other solution, but this
at least fixes the build.
llvm-svn: 298434
Summary:
Hello everybody,
this is an incremental patch for the NoMalloc-Checker I wrote. It allows to configure the memory-management functions, that are checked,
This might be helpful for a code base with custom functions in use, or non-standard functionality, like posix_memalign.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, hokein, alexfh
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, alexfh
Subscribers: sbenza, nemanjai, JDevlieghere
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Patch by Jonas Toth!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28239
llvm-svn: 296734
Summary:
This checker flags the use of C-style memory management functionality and notes about modern alternatives.
In an earlier revision it tried to autofix some kind of patterns, but that was a bad idea. Since memory management can be so widespread in a program, manual updating is most likely necessary.
Maybe for special cases, there could be later additions to this basic checker.
This is the first checker I wrote and I never did something with clang (only compiling programs). So whenever I missed conventions or did plain retarded stuff, feel free to point it out! I am willing to fix them and write a better checker.
I hope the patch does work, I never did this either. On a testapply in my repository it did, but I am pretty unconfident in my patching skills :)
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, hokein, alexfh, malcolm.parsons
Subscribers: cfe-commits, JDevlieghere, nemanjai, Eugene.Zelenko, Prazek, mgorny, modocache
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26167
Patch by Jonas Toth!
llvm-svn: 289546
Summary:
This doesn't work after converting SmallSetVector to use DenseSet.
Instead we can just use a SmallVector.
Reviewers: timshen
Subscribers: nemanjai, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25647
llvm-svn: 284873
Summary:
The matcher for matching "class with default constructor" still match
some classes without default constructor, which trigger an assert at
Line 307. This patch makes the matcher more strict.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: nemanjai, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25747
llvm-svn: 284727
Classes with virtual methods or virtual bases are not trivially default constructible, so their members and bases need to be initialized.
Patch by Malcolm Parsons.
llvm-svn: 283224
Summary:
Use a set rather than a vector of defined special member functions so
that multiple declarations of the same function are only counted once.
Move some private static member functions into the cpp file.
Run clang-format on header.
Reviewers: ericLemanissier, Prazek, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: Prazek, cfe-commits, nemanjai
Projects: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23008
llvm-svn: 277523
Summary:
When the expression is value dependent,
isIntegerConstantExpr() crashes in C++03 mode with
../tools/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp:9330: (anonymous namespace)::ICEDiag CheckICE(const clang::Expr *, const clang::ASTContext &):
Assertion `!E->isValueDependent() && "Should not see value dependent exprs!"' failed.
In C++11 mode, that assert does not trigger.
This commit works around this in the check. We don't check
value-dependent indices and instead check their specialization.
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: nemanjai, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22190
llvm-svn: 275461
Summary:
Fixed a crash in cppcoreguidelines-pro-type-member-init when checking record types with indirect fields pre-C++11.
Fixed handling of indirect fields so they are properly checked and suggested fixes are proposed.
Patch by Michael Miller!
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, hokein
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19993
llvm-svn: 269024
Summary: Finds return statements in assign operator bodies where the return value is different from '*this'. Only assignment operators with correct return value Class& are checked.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, sbenza
Subscribers: o.gyorgy, baloghadamsoftware, LegalizeAdulthood, aaron.ballman, Eugene.Zelenko, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18265
llvm-svn: 268492
Summary: Fix a crash when a record type initializes itself in its own base class initializer list.
Patch by Michael Miller!
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, hokein
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19802
llvm-svn: 268369
Summary:
This is a step forward cleaning up the namespaces in clang-tidy/utils.
There is no behavior change.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19819
llvm-svn: 268356
Summary:
The goal of the patch is to bring checkers in their appropriate namespace.
This path doesn't change any behavior.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19811
llvm-svn: 268264
Summary: Fixed a crash in cppcoreguidelines-pro-type-member-init when encountering a type that uses one of its template parameters as a base when compiling for C++98.
Patch by Michael Miller!
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, hokein
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19539
llvm-svn: 267700
Summary: Fixes a crash in cppcoreguidelines-pro-type-member-init when checking some record types with a constructor without a body. We now check to make sure the constructor has a body before looking for missing members and base initializers.
Patch by Michael Miller!
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, hokein
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19270
llvm-svn: 266862
Summary: Added the remaining features needed to satisfy C++ Core Guideline Type.6: Always initialize a member variable to cppcoreguidelines-pro-type-member-init. The check now flags all default-constructed uses of record types without user-provided default constructors that would leave their memory in an undefined state. The check suggests value initializing them instead.
Reviewers: flx, alexfh, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: klimek, aaron.ballman, LegalizeAdulthood, cfe-commits
Patch by Michael Miller!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18584
llvm-svn: 266191
Summary:
This check flags initializers of globals that access extern objects, and therefore can lead to order-of-initialization problems (this recommandation is part of CPP core guidelines).
Note that this only checks half of the guideline for now (it does not enforce using constexpr functions).
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, etienneb, Eugene.Zelenko, cfe-commits
Patch by Clement Courbet!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18649
llvm-svn: 265774
Summary:
This patch is a continuation of http://reviews.llvm.org/D10553 by Jonathan B Coe.
The main additions are:
1. For C++11 the check suggests in-class field initialization as fix. This
makes the fields future proof towards the addition of new constructors.
2 For older language versions the fields are added in the right position
in the initializer list with more tests.
3. User documentation.
Reviewers: alexfh, jbcoe
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16517
llvm-svn: 260873
Summary:
This patch is provided in preparation for removing autoconf on 1/26. The proposal to remove autoconf on 1/26 was discussed on the llvm-dev thread here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-January/093875.html
"Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds."
-J. Robert Oppenheimer
Reviewers: chandlerc, grosbach, bob.wilson, echristo
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16475
llvm-svn: 258864
Summary:
This is http://reviews.llvm.org/D13746 but instead of including <array>,
a stub is provided.
This check flags all array subscriptions on static arrays and
std::arrays that either have a non-compile-time-constant index or are
out of bounds.
Dynamic accesses into arrays are difficult for both tools and humans to
validate as safe. array_view is a bounds-checked, safe type for
accessing arrays of data. at() is another alternative that ensures
single accesses are bounds-checked. If iterators are needed to access an
array, use the iterators from an array_view constructed over the array.
This rule is part of the "Bounds safety" profile of the C++ Core
Guidelines, see
https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#-bounds2-only-index-into-arrays-using-constant-expressions
Reviewers: alexfh, sbenza, bkramer, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15030
llvm-svn: 255470
Summary:
This check flags all array subscriptions on static arrays and
std::arrays that either have a non-compile-time-constant index or are
out of bounds.
Dynamic accesses into arrays are difficult for both tools and humans to
validate as safe. array_view is a bounds-checked, safe type for
accessing arrays of data. at() is another alternative that ensures
single accesses are bounds-checked. If iterators are needed to access an
array, use the iterators from an array_view constructed over the array.
This rule is part of the "Bounds safety" profile of the C++ Core
Guidelines, see
https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#-bounds2-only-index-into-arrays-using-constant-expressions
Reviewers: alexfh, sbenza, bkramer, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13746
llvm-svn: 253401
Summary:
This check flags all use of c-style casts that perform a static_cast
downcast, const_cast, or reinterpret_cast.
Use of these casts can violate type safety and cause the program to
access a
variable that is actually of type X to be accessed as if it were of an
unrelated type Z. Note that a C-style (T)expression cast means to
perform
the first of the following that is possible: a const_cast, a
static_cast, a
static_cast followed by a const_cast, a reinterpret_cast, or a
reinterpret_cast followed by a const_cast. This rule bans (T)expression
only when used to perform an unsafe cast.
This rule is part of the "Type safety" profile of the C++ Core
Guidelines, see
https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#-type4-dont-use-c-style-texpression-casts-that-would-perform-a-static_cast-downcast-const_cast-or-reinterpret_cast.
Reviewers: alexfh, sbenza, bkramer, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14096
llvm-svn: 252425
Summary:
This check flags all calls to c-style vararg functions and all use
of va_list, va_start and va_arg.
Passing to varargs assumes the correct type will be read. This is
fragile because it cannot generally be enforced to be safe in the
language and so relies on programmer discipline to get it right.
This rule is part of the "Type safety" profile of the C++ Core
Guidelines, see
https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#-type8-avoid-reading-from-varargs-or-passing-vararg-arguments-prefer-variadic-template-parameters-instead
This commits also reverts
"[clang-tidy] add cert's VariadicFunctionDefCheck as cppcoreguidelines-pro-type-vararg-def"
because that check makes the SFINAE use of vararg functions impossible.
Reviewers: alexfh, sbenza, bkramer, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13787
llvm-svn: 250939
Summary:
This check flags all access to members of unions. Passing unions as a
whole is not flagged.
Reading from a union member assumes that member was the last one
written, and writing to a union member assumes another member with a
nontrivial destructor had its destructor called. This is fragile because
it cannot generally be enforced to be safe in the language and so relies
on programmer discipline to get it right.
This rule is part of the "Type safety" profile of the C++ Core
Guidelines, see
https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#-type7-avoid-accessing-members-of-raw-unions-prefer-variant-instead
Reviewers: alexfh, sbenza, bkramer, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13784
llvm-svn: 250537
Summary:
This check flags all usage of pointer arithmetic, because it could lead
to an
invalid pointer.
Subtraction of two pointers is not flagged by this check.
Pointers should only refer to single objects, and pointer arithmetic is
fragile and easy to get wrong. array_view is a bounds-checked, safe type
for accessing arrays of data.
This rule is part of the "Bounds safety" profile of the C++ Core
Guidelines, see
https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#-bounds1-dont-use-pointer-arithmetic-use-array_view-instead
Depends on D13313
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13311
llvm-svn: 250116
Summary:
This check flags all usages of static_cast, where a base class is casted
to a derived class.
In those cases, a fixit is provided to convert the cast to a
dynamic_cast.
Use of these casts can violate type safety and cause the program to
access a variable that is actually of type X to be accessed as if it
were of an unrelated type Z.
This rule is part of the "Type safety" profile of the C++ Core
Guidelines, see
https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#-type2-dont-use-static_cast-downcasts-use-dynamic_cast-instead
Depends on D13313
Reviewers: alexfh, sbenza, bkramer, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13368
llvm-svn: 250098
Jonas Devlieghere