r180893 added an indirect include of llvm/Config/Targets.def to
llvm/Support/CodeGen.h, which in turn is included by things like
llvm/IR/Module.h. After a full build of LLVM and Clang, ninja had to
rebuild 1274 files after reconfiguring.
This commit strips CodeGen.h back down to just a pile of enums and moves
the expensive includes over to CodeGenCWrappers.h (which is only
included in two places). This gets ninja down to 88 files if you
reconfigure with, e.g., -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=X86.
llvm-svn: 260835
We removed access to the DataLayout on the TargetMachine and
deprecated the C API function LLVMGetTargetMachineData() in r243114.
However the way I tried to be backward compatible was broken: I
changed the wrapper of the TargetMachine to be a structure that
includes the DataLayout as well. However the TargetMachine is also
wrapped by the ExecutionEngine, in the more classic way. A client
using the TargetMachine wrapped by the ExecutionEngine and trying
to get the DataLayout would break.
It seems tricky to solve the problem completely in the C API
implementation. This patch tries to address this backward
compatibility in a more lighter way in the C++ API. The C API is
restored in its original state and the removed C++ API is
reintroduced, but privately. The C API is friended to the
TargetMachine and should be the only consumer for this API.
Reviewers: ributzka
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12263
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 246082
We removed access to the DataLayout on the TargetMachine and
deprecated the C API function LLVMGetTargetMachineData() in r243114.
However the way I tried to be backward compatible was broken: I
changed the wrapper of the TargetMachine to be a structure that
includes the DataLayout as well. However the TargetMachine is also
wrapped by the ExecutionEngine, in the more classic way. A client
using the TargetMachine wrapped by the ExecutionEngine and trying
to get the DataLayout would break.
It seems tricky to solve the problem completely in the C API
implementation. This patch tries to address this backward
compatibility in a more lighter way in the C++ API. The C API is
restored in its original state and the removed C++ API is
reintroduced, but privately. The C API is friended to the
TargetMachine and should be the only consumer for this API.
Reviewers: ributzka
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12263
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 246052
We removed access to the DataLayout on the TargetMachine and
deprecated the C API function LLVMGetTargetMachineData() in r243114.
However the way I tried to be backward compatible was broken: I
changed the wrapper of the TargetMachine to be a structure that
includes the DataLayout as well. However the TargetMachine is also
wrapped by the ExecutionEngine, in the more classic way. A client
using the TargetMachine wrapped by the ExecutionEngine and trying
to get the DataLayout would break.
It seems tricky to solve the problem completely in the C API
implementation. This patch tries to address this backward
compatibility in a more lighter way in the C++ API. The C API is
restored in its original state and the removed C++ API is
reintroduced, but privately. The C API is friended to the
TargetMachine and should be the only consumer for this API.
Reviewers: ributzka
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12263
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 246044
This reverts commit 433bfd94e4b7e3cc3f8b08f8513ce47817941b0c.
Broke some bot, have to see why it passed locally.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 245917
We removed access to the DataLayout on the TargetMachine and
deprecated the C API function LLVMGetTargetMachineData() in r243114.
However the way I tried to be backward compatible was broken: I
changed the wrapper of the TargetMachine to be a structure that
includes the DataLayout as well. However the TargetMachine is also
wrapped by the ExecutionEngine, in the more classic way. A client
using the TargetMachine wrapped by the ExecutionEngine and trying
to get the DataLayout would break.
It seems tricky to solve the problem completely in the C API
implementation. This patch tries to address this backward
compatibility in a more lighter way in the C++ API. The C API is
restored in its original state and the removed C++ API is
reintroduced, but privately. The C API is friended to the
TargetMachine and should be the only consumer for this API.
Reviewers: ributzka
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12263
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 245916
After r244870 flush() will only compare two null pointers and return,
doing nothing but wasting run time. The call is not required any more
as the stream and its SmallString are always in sync.
Thanks to David Blaikie for reviewing.
llvm-svn: 244928
There is an ODR conflict between lib/ExecutionEngine/ExecutionEngineBindings.cpp
and lib/Target/TargetMachineC.cpp. The inline definitions should simply
be marked static (thanks dblaikie for the hint).
llvm-svn: 243298
Summary:
Replace getDataLayout() with a createDataLayout() method to make
explicit that it is intended to create a DataLayout only and not
accessing it for other purpose.
This change is the last of a series of commits dedicated to have a
single DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned
by the module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits, rafael, yaron.keren
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11103
(cherry picked from commit 5609fc56bca971e5a7efeaa6ca4676638eaec5ea)
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 243114
This reverts commit 0f720d984f419c747709462f7476dff962c0bc41.
It breaks clang too badly, I need to prepare a proper patch for clang
first.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 243089
Summary:
Replace getDataLayout() with a createDataLayout() method to make
explicit that it is intended to create a DataLayout only and not
accessing it for other purpose.
This change is the last of a series of commits dedicated to have a
single DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned
by the module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits, rafael, yaron.keren
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11103
(cherry picked from commit 5609fc56bca971e5a7efeaa6ca4676638eaec5ea)
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 243083
Summary:
This continues the patch series to eliminate StringRef forms of GNU triples
from the internals of LLVM that began in r239036.
Reviewers: rengolin
Reviewed By: rengolin
Subscribers: llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10381
llvm-svn: 239815
The TargetRegistry is just a namespace-like class, instantiated in one
place to use a range-based for loop. Instead, expose access to the
registry via a range-based 'targets()' function instead. This makes most
uses a bit awkward/more verbose - but eventually we should just add a
range-based find_if function which will streamline these functions. I'm
happy to mkae them a bit awkward in the interim as encouragement to
improve the algorithms in time.
llvm-svn: 237059
formatted_raw_ostream is a wrapper over another stream to add column and line
number tracking.
It is used only for asm printing.
This patch moves the its creation down to where we know we are printing
assembly. This has the following advantages:
* Simpler lifetime management: std::unique_ptr
* We don't compute column and line number of object files :-)
llvm-svn: 234535
Revert "Add classof implementations to the raw_ostream classes."
Revert "Use the cast machinery to remove dummy uses of formatted_raw_ostream."
The underlying issue can be fixed without classof.
llvm-svn: 234495
Summary:
DataLayout keeps the string used for its creation.
As a side effect it is no longer needed in the Module.
This is "almost" NFC, the string is no longer
canonicalized, you can't rely on two "equals" DataLayout
having the same string returned by getStringRepresentation().
Get rid of DataLayoutPass: the DataLayout is in the Module
The DataLayout is "per-module", let's enforce this by not
duplicating it more than necessary.
One more step toward non-optionality of the DataLayout in the
module.
Make DataLayout Non-Optional in the Module
Module->getDataLayout() will never returns nullptr anymore.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: resistor, llvm-commits, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7992
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 231270
LLVM's include tree and the use of using declarations to hide the
'legacy' namespace for the old pass manager.
This undoes the primary modules-hostile change I made to keep
out-of-tree targets building. I sent an email inquiring about whether
this would be reasonable to do at this phase and people seemed fine with
it, so making it a reality. This should allow us to start bootstrapping
with modules to a certain extent along with making it easier to mix and
match headers in general.
The updates to any code for users of LLVM are very mechanical. Switch
from including "llvm/PassManager.h" to "llvm/IR/LegacyPassManager.h".
Qualify the types which now produce compile errors with "legacy::". The
most common ones are "PassManager", "PassManagerBase", and
"FunctionPassManager".
llvm-svn: 229094
terms of the new pass manager's TargetIRAnalysis.
Yep, this is one of the nicer bits of the new pass manager's design.
Passes can in many cases operate in a vacuum and so we can just nest
things when convenient. This is particularly convenient here as I can
now consolidate all of the TargetMachine logic on this analysis.
The most important change here is that this pushes the function we need
TTI for all the way into the TargetMachine, and re-creates the TTI
object for each function rather than re-using it for each function.
We're now prepared to teach the targets to produce function-specific TTI
objects with specific subtargets cached, etc.
One piece of feedback I'd love here is whether its worth renaming any of
this stuff. None of the names really seem that awesome to me at this
point, but TargetTransformInfoWrapperPass is particularly ... odd.
TargetIRAnalysisWrapper might make more sense. I would want to do that
rename separately anyways, but let me know what you think.
llvm-svn: 227731
base which it adds a single analysis pass to, to instead return the type
erased TargetTransformInfo object constructed for that TargetMachine.
This removes all of the pass variants for TTI. There is now a single TTI
*pass* in the Analysis layer. All of the Analysis <-> Target
communication is through the TTI's type erased interface itself. While
the diff is large here, it is nothing more that code motion to make
types available in a header file for use in a different source file
within each target.
I've tried to keep all the doxygen comments and file boilerplate in line
with this move, but let me know if I missed anything.
With this in place, the next step to making TTI work with the new pass
manager is to introduce a really simple new-style analysis that produces
a TTI object via a callback into this routine on the target machine.
Once we have that, we'll have the building blocks necessary to accept
a function argument as well.
llvm-svn: 227685
derived classes.
Since global data alignment, layout, and mangling is often based on the
DataLayout, move it to the TargetMachine. This ensures that global
data is going to be layed out and mangled consistently if the subtarget
changes on a per function basis. Prior to this all targets(*) have
had subtarget dependent code moved out and onto the TargetMachine.
*One target hasn't been migrated as part of this change: R600. The
R600 port has, as a subtarget feature, the size of pointers and
this affects global data layout. I've currently hacked in a FIXME
to enable progress, but the port needs to be updated to either pass
the 64-bitness to the TargetMachine, or fix the DataLayout to
avoid subtarget dependent features.
llvm-svn: 227113
With this a DataLayoutPass can be reused for multiple modules.
Once we have doInitialization/doFinalization, it doesn't seem necessary to pass
a Module to the constructor.
Overall this change seems in line with the idea of making DataLayout a required
part of Module. With it the only way of having a DataLayout used is to add it
to the Module.
llvm-svn: 217548
Take a StringRef instead of a "const char *".
Take a "std::error_code &" instead of a "std::string &" for error.
A create static method would be even better, but this patch is already a bit too
big.
llvm-svn: 216393
string_ostream is a safe and efficient string builder that combines opaque
stack storage with a built-in ostream interface.
small_string_ostream<bytes> additionally permits an explicit stack storage size
other than the default 128 bytes to be provided. Beyond that, storage is
transferred to the heap.
This convenient class can be used in most places an
std::string+raw_string_ostream pair or SmallString<>+raw_svector_ostream pair
would previously have been used, in order to guarantee consistent access
without byte truncation.
The patch also converts much of LLVM to use the new facility. These changes
include several probable bug fixes for truncated output, a programming error
that's no longer possible with the new interface.
llvm-svn: 211749
Eventually DataLayoutPass should go away, but for now that is the only easy
way to get a DataLayout in some APIs. This patch only changes the ones that
have easy access to a Module.
One interesting issue with sometimes using DataLayoutPass and sometimes
fetching it from the Module is that we have to make sure they are equivalent.
We can get most of the way there by always constructing the pass with a Module.
In fact, the pass could be changed to point to an external DataLayout instead
of owning one to make this stricter.
Unfortunately, the C api passes a DataLayout, so it has to be up to the caller
to make sure the pass and the module are in sync.
llvm-svn: 202204
After this I will set the default back to F_None. The advantage is that
before this patch forgetting to set F_Binary would corrupt a file on windows.
Forgetting to set F_Text produces one that cannot be read in notepad, which
is a better failure mode :-)
llvm-svn: 202052
This patch adds the target analysis passes (usually TargetTransformInfo) to the
codgen pipeline. We also expose now the AddAnalysisPasses method through the C
API, because the optimizer passes would also benefit from better target-specific
cost models.
Reviewed by Andrew Kaylor
llvm-svn: 199926
subsequent changes are easier to review. About to fix some layering
issues, and wanted to separate out the necessary churn.
Also comment and sink the include of "Windows.h" in three .inc files to
match the usage in Memory.inc.
llvm-svn: 198685
Error handling code for raw_fd_ostream constructor is present, but
never used, because formatted_raw_ostream will always assert on closed
fd's before.
Patch by Peter Zotov
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1909
llvm-svn: 192881
If no targets are registered, LLVMGetFirstTarget currently fails with
an assertion. This patch makes it return NULL instead, similarly to
how LLVMGetNextTarget would.
Patch by Peter Zotov
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1908
llvm-svn: 192878
CodeModel: It's now possible to create an MCJIT instance with any CodeModel you like. Previously it was only possible to
create an MCJIT that used CodeModel::JITDefault.
EnableFastISel: It's now possible to turn on the fast instruction selector.
The CodeModel option required some trickery. The problem is that previously, we were ensuring future binary compatibility in
the MCJITCompilerOptions by mandating that the user bzero's the options struct and passes the sizeof() that he saw; the
bindings then bzero the remaining bits. This works great but assumes that the bitwise zero equivalent of any field is a
sensible default value.
But this is not the case for LLVMCodeModel, or its internal equivalent, llvm::CodeModel::Model. In both of those, the default
for a JIT is CodeModel::JITDefault (or LLVMCodeModelJITDefault), which is not bitwise zero.
Hence this change introduces LLVMInitializeMCJITCompilerOptions(), which will initialize the user's options struct with
defaults. The user will use this in the same way that they would have previously used memset() or bzero(). MCJITCAPITest.cpp
illustrates the change, as does the comment in ExecutionEngine.h.
llvm-svn: 180893
the things, and renames it to CBindingWrapping.h. I also moved
CBindingWrapping.h into Support/.
This new file just contains the macros for defining different wrap/unwrap
methods.
The calls to those macros, as well as any custom wrap/unwrap definitions
(like for array of Values for example), are put into corresponding C++
headers.
Doing this required some #include surgery, since some .cpp files relied
on the fact that including Wrap.h implicitly caused the inclusion of a
bunch of other things.
This also now means that the C++ headers will include their corresponding
C API headers; for example Value.h must include llvm-c/Core.h. I think
this is harmless, since the C API headers contain just external function
declarations and some C types, so I don't believe there should be any
nasty dependency issues here.
llvm-svn: 180881
Amaury Sechet