This patch adds four new options to control:
- Spaces after control keyworks (if(..) vs if (..))
- Spaces in empty parentheses (f( ) vs f())
- Spaces in c-style casts (( int )1.0 vs (int)1.0)
- Spaces in other parentheses (f(a) vs f( a ))
Patch by Joe Hermaszewski. Thank you for working on this!
llvm-svn: 188793
Previously these were formatting as catch (E & e) because the inner parenthesis
was being marked as an expression.
Patch by Thomas Gibson-Robinson.
llvm-svn: 188153
This removes a formatting choice that was added at one point, but is
not generally liked by users. Specifically, in builder-type calls, do
(easily) break if the object before the ./-> is either a field or a
parameter-less function call. I.e., don't break after "aa.aa.aa" or
"aa.aa.aa()". In general, these sequences in builder-type calls are
seen as a single entity and thus breaking them up is a bad idea.
llvm-svn: 187865
Before:
template <bool B, bool C>
class A {
static_assert(B &&C, "Something is wrong");
};
After:
template <bool B, bool C>
class A {
static_assert(B && C, "Something is wrong");
};
(Note the spacing around '&&'). Also change the identifier table to always
understand all C++11 keywords (which seems like the right thing to do).
llvm-svn: 187589
New options:
* Break before the commas of constructor initializers and align
the commas with the colon.
* Break before binary operators
Additionally, for styles without column limit, don't just accept
linebreaks done by the user, but instead remove 'invalid' (according
to the current style) linebreaks and add 'required' ones.
llvm-svn: 187210
The AlwaysBreakBeforeMultilineStrings rule does not really make sense
if it does not a column gain.
Before (in Google style):
f(
"aaaa"
"bbbb");
After:
f("aaaa"
"bbbb");
llvm-svn: 186515
Summary:
These can appear when comments contain command lines with quoted line
breaks. As the text (including escaped newlines and '//' from consecutive lines)
is a single line comment, we used to break it even when it didn't exceed column
limit. This is a temporary solution, in the future we may want to support this
case completely - at least adjust leading whitespace when changing indentation
of the first line.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1146
llvm-svn: 186456
The fundamental concept is:
Format as if the braced init list was a function call (with parentheses
replaced by braces). If there is no name/type before the opening brace
(e.g. if the braced list is nested), assume a zero-length identifier
just before the opening brace.
This behavior is gated on a new style flag, which for now replaces the
SpacesInBracedLists style flag. Activate this style flag for Google
style to reflect recent style guide changes.
llvm-svn: 186433
This fixes an incorrect detection that led to a formatting error.
Before:
some_var = function (*some_pointer_var)[0];
After:
some_var = function(*some_pointer_var)[0];
llvm-svn: 186402
Fixed a test that by now passed for the wrong reason.
Before:
llvm::outs() << "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa: " << aaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
After:
llvm::outs() << "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa: "
<< aaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
Also reformatted Format.cpp with the latest changes (1 formatting fix
and 1 layout change of a <<-chain).
llvm-svn: 186322
clang-format used to treat array subscript expressions much like
function call (just replacing () with []). However, this is not really
appropriate especially for expressions with multiple subscripts.
Although it might seem counter-intuitive, the most consistent solution
seems to be to always (if necessary) break before a square bracket,
never after it. Also, multiple subscripts of the same expression should
be aligned if they are on subsequent lines.
Before:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa[aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa][
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb] = c;
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa[
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa][
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb] = ccccccccccc;
After:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa[aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa]
[bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb] = c;
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
[aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa]
[bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb] = ccccccccccc;
llvm-svn: 186153
(if they are not function-like).
Before:
SomeFunction(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa)
OVERRIDE;
After:
SomeFunction(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa) OVERRIDE;
llvm-svn: 186117
Trailing return types can only occur in declaration contexts.
Before:
void f() { auto a = b -> c(); }
After:
void f() { auto a = b->c(); }
llvm-svn: 186087
This is not activated for any style, might change or go away
completely.
For those that want to play around with it, set
ExperimentalAutoDetectBinPacking to true.
clang-format will then:
Look at whether function calls/declarations/definitions are currently
formatted with one parameter per line (on a case-by-case basis). If so,
clang-format will avoid bin-packing the parameters. If all parameters
are on one line (thus that line is "inconclusive"), clang-format will
make the choice dependent on whether there are other bin-packed
calls/declarations in the same file.
The reason for this change is that bin-packing in some situations can be
really bad and an author might opt to put one parameter on each line. If
the author does that, he might want clang-format not to mess with that.
If the author is unhappy with the one-per-line formatting, clang-format
can easily be convinced to bin-pack by putting any two parameters on the
same line.
llvm-svn: 186003
This fixes llvm.org/PR15170.
For now, the basic formatting rules are (based on the C++11 standard):
* Surround the "->" with spaces.
* Break before "->".
Also fix typo.
llvm-svn: 185938
Additionally, allow breaking after c-style casts, but with a high
penalty.
Before:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa *foo = (
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa *)bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb;
After:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa *foo = (aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa *)
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb;
This fixes llvm.org/PR16049.
llvm-svn: 185685
Summary:
Always breaking before multiline strings can help format complex
expressions containing multiline strings more consistently, and avoid consuming
too much horizontal space.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1097
llvm-svn: 185622
Before: void f(int */* unused */) {}
After: void f(int * /* unused */) {}
The previous version seems to be valid C++ code but confuses many syntax
highlighters.
llvm-svn: 185320
Summary:
E.g. the second line in
return aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa +
b; //
is indented 4 characters more than in
return aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa +
b;
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D984
llvm-svn: 184078
Summary:
Basically, don't special-case line comments in this regard. And fixed
an incorrect test, that relied on the wrong behavior.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D962
llvm-svn: 183851
Summary:
Introduced two new style parameters: PenaltyBreakComment and
PenaltyBreakString. Add penalty for each character of a breakable token beyond
the column limit (this relates mainly to comments, as they are broken only on
whitespace). Tuned PenaltyBreakComment to prefer comment breaking over breaking
inside most binary expressions.
Fixed a bug that prevented *, & and && from being considered TT_BinaryOperator
in the presense of adjacent comments.
Reviewers: klimek, djasper
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D933
llvm-svn: 183530
Before, clang-format would happily move a trailing block comment to a
new line, which normally changes the perceived binding of that comment.
E.g., it would move:
void f() { /* comment */
...
}
to:
void f() {
/* comment */
...
}
llvm-svn: 183420
The leading "}" in the construct "} else if (..) {" was confusing the
expression parser. Thus, no fake parentheses were generated and the
indentation was broken in some cases.
llvm-svn: 183393
Daniel Jasper