MSVC (2012, 2013, 2013 Nov CTP) fail on the following code:
int main() {
int arr[] = {1, 2};
for (int i : arr)
do {} while (0);
}
The fix is to put {} around the for loop. I've reported this to the MSVC
team.
llvm-svn: 203371
Padding does not seem to be useful currently, and it leads to bogus location if an error
points to the end of the file.
rdar://15836513
llvm-svn: 203370
r203364: what was use_iterator is now user_iterator, and there is
a use_iterator for directly iterating over the uses.
This also switches to use the range-based APIs where appropriate.
llvm-svn: 203365
This requires a number of steps.
1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation
detail
2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User*
iterator.
3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the
Use to the User.
4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs.
5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users().
6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether
they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when
needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally
opaque.
Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the
Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and
switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the
renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make
any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would
touch all of the same lies of code.
The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice
regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s
rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits
a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird
extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have.
I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms
a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into
another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right
move.
However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up
a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =]
llvm-svn: 203364
This is a reapplication of r203236 with modifications to the definition of attrs() and following the new style guidelines on auto usage.
llvm-svn: 203362
memcpy cannot be passed NULL. Ensuring that the destination pointer is non-NULL
requires checking success. Rather than performing the success check at that
point, increasing indentation an additional level, fold it into the previous
statement.
llvm-svn: 203359
relevant subclasses of RuntimeDyldImpl. This allows construction of
RuntimeDyldImpl instances to be deferred until after the target architecture is
known.
llvm-svn: 203352
This can possibly be refined later, but right now the experience
is so incomprehensible for a user to understand what is going on
this isn't a useful warning.
llvm-svn: 203336
An option with the same name already exists in the makefile build.
The name CLANG_IS_PRODUCTION is historical. We should probably change it, but
should change the configure build at the same time.
llvm-svn: 203325
Argyrios Kyrtzidis