specifier resulted in the creation of a new TagDecl node, which
happens either when the tag specifier was a definition or when the tag
specifier was the first declaration of that tag type. This information
has several uses, the first of which is implemented in this commit:
1) In C++, one is not allowed to define tag types within a type
specifier (e.g., static_cast<struct S { int x; } *>(0) is
ill-formed) or within the result or parameter types of a
function. We now diagnose this.
2) We can extend DeclGroups to contain information about any tags
that are declared/defined within the declaration specifiers of a
variable, e.g.,
struct Point { int x, y, z; } p;
This will help improve AST printing and template instantiation,
among other things.
3) For C99, we can keep track of whether a tag type is defined
within the type of a parameter, to properly cope with cases like,
e.g.,
int bar(struct T2 { int x; } y) {
struct T2 z;
}
We can also do similar things wherever there is a type specifier,
e.g., to keep track of where the definition of S occurs in this
legal C99 code:
(struct S { int x, y; } *)0
llvm-svn: 72555
parser. Rather than placing all of the delayed member function
declarations and inline definitions into a single bucket corresponding
to the top-level class, we instead mirror the nesting structure of the
nested classes and place the delayed member functions into their
appropriate place. Then, when we actually parse the delayed member
function declarations, set up the scope stack the same way as it was
when we originally saw the declaration, so that we can find, e.g.,
template parameters that are in scope.
llvm-svn: 72502
declaration references. The key realization is that dependent Decls,
which actually require instantiation, can only refer to the current
instantiation or members thereof. And, since the current context
during instantiation contains all of those members of the current
instantiation, we can simply find the real instantiate that matches up
with the "current instantiation" template.
llvm-svn: 72486
instantiation of a declaration from the template version (or version
that lives in a template) and a given set of template arguments. This
needs much, much more testing, but it suffices for simple examples
like
typedef T* iterator;
iterator begin();
llvm-svn: 72461
llvm::SmallVector that owns all of the AST nodes inside of it. This
RAII class is used to ensure proper destruction of AST nodes when
template instantiation fails.
llvm-svn: 72186
template, introduce that member function into the template
instantiation stack. Also, add diagnostics showing the member function
within the instantiation stack and clean up the qualified-name
printing so that we get something like:
note: in instantiation of member function 'Switch1<int, 2, 2>::f'
requested here
in the template instantiation backtrace.
llvm-svn: 72015
template<typename T>
struct X {
struct Inner;
};
template struct X<int>::Inner;
This change is larger than it looks because it also fixes some
a problem with nested-name-specifiers and tags. We weren't requiring
the DeclContext associated with the scope specifier of a tag to be
complete. Therefore, when looking for something like "struct
X<int>::Inner", we weren't instantiating X<int>.
This, naturally, uncovered a problem with member pointers, where we
were requiring the left-hand side of a member pointer access
expression (e.g., x->*) to be a complete type. However, this is wrong:
the semantics of this expression does not require a complete type (EDG
agrees).
Stuart vouched for me. Blame him.
llvm-svn: 71756
of class members (recursively). Only member classes are actually
instantiated; the instantiation logic for member functions and
variables are just stubs.
llvm-svn: 71713
templates. In particular:
- An explicit instantiation can follow an implicit instantiation (we
were improperly diagnosing this as an error, previously).
- In C++0x, an explicit instantiation that follows an explicit
specialization of the same template specialization is ignored. In
C++98, we just emit an extension warning.
- In C++0x, an explicit instantiation must be in a namespace
enclosing the original template. C++98 has no such requirement.
Also, fixed a longstanding FIXME regarding the integral type that is
used for the size of a constant array type when it is being instantiated.
llvm-svn: 71689
still aren't instantiating the definitions of class template members,
and core issues 275 and 259 will both affect the checking that we do
for explicit instantiations (but are not yet implemented).
llvm-svn: 71613
TemplateArgumentList. This avoids the need to pass around
pointer/length pairs of template arguments lists, and will eventually
make it easier to introduce member templates and variadic templates.
llvm-svn: 71517
specialization" within a C++ template, and permit name lookup into the
current instantiation. For example, given:
template<typename T, typename U>
struct X {
typedef T type;
X* x1; // current instantiation
X<T, U> *x2; // current instantiation
X<U, T> *x3; // not current instantiation
::X<type, U> *x4; // current instantiation
X<typename X<type, U>::type, U>: *x5; // current instantiation
};
llvm-svn: 71471
semantic rules that gcc and icc use. This implements the variadic
and concrete versions as builtins and has sema do the
disambiguation. There are probably a bunch of details to finish up
but this seems like a large monotonic step forward :)
llvm-svn: 71212
return type and the selector. This is inconsistent with C functions
(where such attributes would be placed on the return type, not the the
FunctionDecl), and is inconsistent with what people are use to seeing.
llvm-svn: 70878
in C++, taking into account conversions to the "composite pointer
type" so that we can compare, e.g., a pointer to a derived class to a
pointer to a base class.
Also, upgrade the "comparing distinct pointer types" from a warning to
an error for C++, since this is clearly an error. Turns out that we
hadn't gone through and audited this code for C++, ever.
Fixes <rdar://problem/6816420>.
llvm-svn: 70829
reason for adding these is to error out in CodeGen when trying to generate
them instead of silently emitting a call to a non-existent function.
(Note that it is not valid to lower these to setjmp/longjmp; in addition
to that lowering being different from the intent, setjmp and longjmp
require a larger buffer.)
llvm-svn: 70658
appear between the return type and the selector. This is a separate code path
from regular attribute processing, as we only want to (a) accept only a specific
set of attributes in this place and (b) want to distinguish to clients the
context in which an attribute was added to an ObjCMethodDecl.
Currently, the attribute 'objc_ownership_returns' is the only attribute that
uses this new feature. Shortly I will add a warning for 'objc_ownership_returns'
to be placed at the end of a method declaration.
llvm-svn: 70504
Sebastian Redl