The expected 'filesystem::path::compare' result states that for different
path only result sign contains the information about passed arguments
(not its integer value). This is due it uses the output of other compare
functions (basic_string_view and char_traits) without further handling and
char_traits uses memcmp for final buffer comparison.
However for GLIBC on AArch64 the code:
int ret = memcmp ("b/a/c", "a/b/c", 1);
Results in '64' where for x86_64 it results in '1'.
This patch fixes the expected 'filesystem::path::compare' by normalizing
all the results before assert comparison.
llvm-svn: 278745
Currently certain tests get killed when compiled with ASAN at -O0 because
they eat all of the systems memory. This doesn't happen at -O1, so enable that
to work around the issue.
llvm-svn: 278722
Although libc++ only requires C++11 to build, there are other
reasons to turn on a newer dialect in the build. For example
IDE's may not highlight any C++14/C++17 in the headers when
configured for C++11. This patch add's a private option for
changing this.
llvm-svn: 278638
Some filesystems track atime always. This relaxes the test to accept either a
filesystem which does not accurately track atime or does track the atime
accurately. This allows the test to pass on filesystems mounted with
`strictatime` on Linux or on macOS.
llvm-svn: 278357
basic_string's constructor calls init which was not getting inlined. This
prevented optimization of const string as init would appear as a call in between
a string's def and use.
Patch by Laxman Sole and Aditya Kumar.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22782
llvm-svn: 278356
I've put some work into the Google Benchmark library in order to make it easier
to benchmark libc++. These changes have already been upstreamed into
Google Benchmark and this patch applies the changes to the in-tree version.
The main improvement in the addition of a 'compare_bench.py' script which
makes it very easy to compare benchmarks. For example to compare the native
STL to libc++ you would run:
`$ compare_bench.py ./util_smartptr.native.out ./util_smartptr.libcxx.out`
And the output would look like:
RUNNING: ./util_smartptr.native.out
Benchmark Time CPU Iterations
----------------------------------------------------------------
BM_SharedPtrCreateDestroy 62 ns 62 ns 10937500
BM_SharedPtrIncDecRef 31 ns 31 ns 23972603
BM_WeakPtrIncDecRef 28 ns 28 ns 23648649
RUNNING: ./util_smartptr.libcxx.out
Benchmark Time CPU Iterations
----------------------------------------------------------------
BM_SharedPtrCreateDestroy 46 ns 46 ns 14957265
BM_SharedPtrIncDecRef 31 ns 31 ns 22435897
BM_WeakPtrIncDecRef 34 ns 34 ns 21084337
Comparing ./util_smartptr.native.out to ./util_smartptr.libcxx.out
Benchmark Time CPU
-----------------------------------------------------
BM_SharedPtrCreateDestroy -0.26 -0.26
BM_SharedPtrIncDecRef +0.00 +0.00
BM_WeakPtrIncDecRef +0.21 +0.21
llvm-svn: 278147
Neither of these results files has been update in years. Linux now has a dozen
or so buildbots tracking it and the Windows results are no longer relevant.
I plan on looking into getting a Windows buildbot going using Appveyor in the
coming days.
llvm-svn: 278087
This change allows building both shared and static version of libc++
in a single build, sharing object files between both versions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23232
llvm-svn: 278068
Summary:
The synopsis in C++11 subclause 28.8 [re.regex] has:
```
basic_regex(const charT* p, size_t len,
flag_type f = regex_constants::ECMAScript);
```
The default argument is added to libc++ by this change.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, rsmith, hubert.reinterpretcast
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22702
Reapplies r277966.
Patch by Jason Liu!
llvm-svn: 277968
Summary:
In the synopsis in C++11 subclause 28.8 [re.regex], `basic_regex` is
specified to have member typedefs `traits_type` and `string_type`. This
change adds them to libc++.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, rsmith, hubert.reinterpretcast
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22698
Patch by Jason Liu!
llvm-svn: 277526
It currently fails because GCC changed the mangling of templates, which affects std::atomic using __attribute__((vector(X))). The bot using GCC 4.9 generates the following message:
In file included from /home/llvm-builder/llvm-buildslave-root/libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-gcc49-cxx11/llvm/projects/libcxx/test/libcxx/atomics/atomics.align/align.pass.sh.cpp:24:0:
/home/llvm-builder/llvm-buildslave-root/libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-gcc49-cxx11/llvm/projects/libcxx/include/atomic: In instantiation of 'atomic_test<T>::atomic_test() [with T = __vector(2) int]':
/home/llvm-builder/llvm-buildslave-root/libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-gcc49-cxx11/llvm/projects/libcxx/test/libcxx/atomics/atomics.align/align.pass.sh.cpp:66:3: required from here
/home/llvm-builder/llvm-buildslave-root/libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-gcc49-cxx11/llvm/projects/libcxx/include/atomic:583:5: error: 'std::__1::__gcc_atomic::__gcc_atomic_t<_Tp>::__gcc_atomic_t() [with _Tp = __vector(2) int]' conflicts with a previous declaration
__gcc_atomic_t() _NOEXCEPT = default;
^
/home/llvm-builder/llvm-buildslave-root/libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-gcc49-cxx11/llvm/projects/libcxx/include/atomic:583:5: note: previous declaration 'std::__1::__gcc_atomic::__gcc_atomic_t<_Tp>::__gcc_atomic_t() [with _Tp = __vector(1) int]'
/home/llvm-builder/llvm-buildslave-root/libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-gcc49-cxx11/llvm/projects/libcxx/include/atomic:583:5: note: -fabi-version=6 (or =0) avoids this error with a change in mangling
/home/llvm-builder/llvm-buildslave-root/libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-gcc49-cxx11/llvm/projects/libcxx/include/atomic:583:5: error: 'std::__1::__gcc_atomic::__gcc_atomic_t<_Tp>::__gcc_atomic_t() [with _Tp = __vector(2) int]' conflicts with a previous declaration
/home/llvm-builder/llvm-buildslave-root/libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-gcc49-cxx11/llvm/projects/libcxx/include/atomic:583:5: note: previous declaration 'std::__1::__gcc_atomic::__gcc_atomic_t<_Tp>::__gcc_atomic_t() [with _Tp = __vector(1) int]'
/home/llvm-builder/llvm-buildslave-root/libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-gcc49-cxx11/llvm/projects/libcxx/include/atomic:583:5: note: -fabi-version=6 (or =0) avoids this error with a change in mangling
/home/llvm-builder/llvm-buildslave-root/libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-gcc49-cxx11/llvm/projects/libcxx/include/atomic:939:5: note: synthesized method 'std::__1::__gcc_atomic::__gcc_atomic_t<_Tp>::__gcc_atomic_t() [with _Tp = __vector(2) int]' first required here
__atomic_base() _NOEXCEPT = default;
^
GCC's docs say the following about ABI version 6:
Version 6, which first appeared in G++ 4.7, corrects the promotion behavior of C++11 scoped enums and the mangling of template argument packs, const/static_cast, prefix ++ and –, and a class scope function used as a template argument.
llvm-svn: 277380
Summary:
libc++ implements std::atomic<_Tp> using __atomic_base<_Tp> with
`mutable _Atomic(_Tp) __a_`. That member must be suitably aligned on
relevant ISAs for instructions such as cmpxchg to work properly, but
this alignment isn't checked anywhere. __atomic_base's implementation
relies on _Atomic doing "the right thing" since it's under the
compiler's control, and only the compiler knows about lock-freedom and
instruction generation. This test makes sure that the compiler isn't
breaking libc++'s expectations.
I'm looking at a few odd things in the C++ standard, and will have a few
other fixes around this area in the future.
This requires building with `-DLIBCXX_HAS_ATOMIC_LIB=True`, the test
marks the dependency as REQUIRES and won't be run without.
Reviewers: cfe-commits
Subscribers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22073
llvm-svn: 277368
If the last destruction is uncontended, skip the atomic store on
__shared_weak_owners_. This shifts some costs from normal
shared_ptr usage to weak_ptr uses.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22470
llvm-svn: 277357
This is a breaking change. The SFINAE required is instantiated the second
the class is instantiated, and this can cause hard SFINAE errors
when applied to references to incomplete types. Ex.
struct IncompleteType;
extern IncompleteType it;
std::tuple<IncompleteType&> t(it); // SFINAE will blow up.
llvm-svn: 276598
In C++03 mode evaluating the SFINAE can cause a hard error due to
access control violations. This is a problem because the SFINAE
is evaluated as soon as the class is instantiated, and not later.
llvm-svn: 276594
Marshall Clow