PCH: fix a regression that reports a module is defined in both pch and pcm.

In r276159, we started to say that a module X is defined in a pch if we specify
-fmodule-name when building the pch. This caused a regression that reports
module X is defined in both pch and pcm if we generate the pch with
-fmodule-name=X and then in a separate clang invocation, we include the pch and
also import X.pcm.

This patch adds an option CompilingPCH similar to CompilingModule. When we use
-fmodule-name=X while building a pch, modular headers in X will be textually
included and the compiler knows that we are not building module X, so we don't
put module X in SUBMODULE_DEFINITION of the pch.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D28415

llvm-svn: 291465
This commit is contained in:
Manman Ren 2017-01-09 19:20:18 +00:00
parent 87495eb8ef
commit ffd3e9d766
12 changed files with 45 additions and 11 deletions

View File

@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ LANGOPT(Modules , 1, 0, "modules extension to C")
COMPATIBLE_LANGOPT(ModulesTS , 1, 0, "C++ Modules TS")
BENIGN_ENUM_LANGOPT(CompilingModule, CompilingModuleKind, 2, CMK_None,
"compiling a module interface")
BENIGN_LANGOPT(CompilingPCH, 1, 0, "building a pch")
COMPATIBLE_LANGOPT(ModulesDeclUse , 1, 0, "require declaration of module uses")
BENIGN_LANGOPT(ModulesSearchAll , 1, 1, "searching even non-imported modules to find unresolved references")
COMPATIBLE_LANGOPT(ModulesStrictDeclUse, 1, 0, "requiring declaration of module uses and all headers to be in modules")

View File

@ -88,6 +88,8 @@ public:
static std::unique_ptr<raw_pwrite_stream>
ComputeASTConsumerArguments(CompilerInstance &CI, StringRef InFile,
std::string &Sysroot, std::string &OutputFile);
bool BeginSourceFileAction(CompilerInstance &CI, StringRef Filename) override;
};
class GenerateModuleAction : public ASTFrontendAction {

View File

@ -127,6 +127,12 @@ GeneratePCHAction::ComputeASTConsumerArguments(CompilerInstance &CI,
return OS;
}
bool GeneratePCHAction::BeginSourceFileAction(CompilerInstance &CI,
StringRef Filename) {
CI.getLangOpts().CompilingPCH = true;
return true;
}
std::unique_ptr<ASTConsumer>
GenerateModuleAction::CreateASTConsumer(CompilerInstance &CI,
StringRef InFile) {

View File

@ -1996,10 +1996,12 @@ void Preprocessor::HandleIncludeDirective(SourceLocation HashLoc,
// Ask HeaderInfo if we should enter this #include file. If not, #including
// this file will have no effect.
bool SkipHeader = false;
if (ShouldEnter &&
!HeaderInfo.ShouldEnterIncludeFile(*this, File, isImport,
SuggestedModule.getModule())) {
ShouldEnter = false;
SkipHeader = true;
if (Callbacks)
Callbacks->FileSkipped(*File, FilenameTok, FileCharacter);
}
@ -2008,6 +2010,14 @@ void Preprocessor::HandleIncludeDirective(SourceLocation HashLoc,
if (!ShouldEnter) {
// If this is a module import, make it visible if needed.
if (auto *M = SuggestedModule.getModule()) {
// When building a pch, -fmodule-name tells the compiler to textually
// include headers in the specified module. But it is possible that
// ShouldEnter is false because we are skipping the header. In that
// case, We are not importing the specified module.
if (SkipHeader && getLangOpts().CompilingPCH &&
M->getTopLevelModuleName() == getLangOpts().CurrentModule)
return;
makeModuleVisible(M, HashLoc);
if (IncludeTok.getIdentifierInfo()->getPPKeywordID() !=
@ -2032,6 +2042,13 @@ void Preprocessor::HandleIncludeDirective(SourceLocation HashLoc,
// Determine if we're switching to building a new submodule, and which one.
if (auto *M = SuggestedModule.getModule()) {
// When building a pch, -fmodule-name tells the compiler to textually
// include headers in the specified module. We are not building the
// specified module.
if (getLangOpts().CompilingPCH &&
M->getTopLevelModuleName() == getLangOpts().CurrentModule)
return;
assert(!CurSubmodule && "should not have marked this as a module yet");
CurSubmodule = M;

View File

@ -4654,17 +4654,6 @@ uint64_t ASTWriter::WriteASTCore(Sema &SemaRef, StringRef isysroot,
// If we're emitting a module, write out the submodule information.
if (WritingModule)
WriteSubmodules(WritingModule);
else if (!getLangOpts().CurrentModule.empty()) {
// If we're building a PCH in the implementation of a module, we may need
// the description of the current module.
//
// FIXME: We may need other modules that we did not load from an AST file,
// such as if a module declares a 'conflicts' on a different module.
Module *M = PP.getHeaderSearchInfo().getModuleMap().findModule(
getLangOpts().CurrentModule);
if (M && !M->IsFromModuleFile)
WriteSubmodules(M);
}
Stream.EmitRecord(SPECIAL_TYPES, SpecialTypes);

View File

@ -0,0 +1 @@
// in pch

View File

@ -0,0 +1 @@
#include "D.h"

View File

@ -0,0 +1 @@
//empty

View File

@ -0,0 +1 @@
//empty

View File

@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
module CloudKit {
header "C.h"
export *
}
module Contacts {
header "D.h"
export *
}

View File

@ -0,0 +1 @@
#include "A.h"

View File

@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
// RUN: rm -rf %t
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fmodules -fimplicit-module-maps -fmodules-cache-path=%t -I %S/Inputs/pch-with-module-name -emit-pch -o %t-A.pch %S/Inputs/pch-with-module-name/test.h -fmodule-name=Contacts -x objective-c-header
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fmodules -fimplicit-module-maps -fmodules-cache-path=%t -I %S/Inputs/pch-with-module-name -include-pch %t-A.pch %s -fsyntax-only -fmodule-name=Contacts -verify
// expected-no-diagnostics
#include "C.h"