From fec74e7ce258f5c630cde2a0f29d3f24ac31c9f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 00:08:49 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] New testcase that causes the code extractor to generate bogus
 code.

llvm-svn: 12404
---
 .../2004-03-14-DominanceProblem.ll            | 34 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/CodeExtractor/2004-03-14-DominanceProblem.ll

diff --git a/llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/CodeExtractor/2004-03-14-DominanceProblem.ll b/llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/CodeExtractor/2004-03-14-DominanceProblem.ll
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..5dffe4b5adfb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/CodeExtractor/2004-03-14-DominanceProblem.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -loop-extract -disable-output
+; This testcase is failing the loop extractor because not all exit blocks 
+; are dominated by all of the live-outs.
+
+implementation   ; Functions:
+
+int %ab(int %alpha, int %beta) {
+entry:
+	br label %loopentry.1.preheader
+
+loopentry.1.preheader:		; preds = %then.1
+	br label %loopentry.1
+
+loopentry.1:		; preds = %loopentry.1.preheader, %no_exit.1
+	br bool false, label %no_exit.1, label %loopexit.0.loopexit1
+
+no_exit.1:		; preds = %loopentry.1
+	%tmp.53 = load int* null		; <int> [#uses=1]
+	br bool false, label %shortcirc_next.2, label %loopentry.1
+
+shortcirc_next.2:		; preds = %no_exit.1
+	%tmp.563 = call int %wins( int 0, int %tmp.53, int 3 )		; <int> [#uses=0]
+	ret int 0
+
+loopexit.0.loopexit1:		; preds = %loopentry.1
+	br label %loopexit.0
+
+loopexit.0:		; preds = %loopexit.0.loopexit, %loopexit.0.loopexit1
+	ret int 0
+}
+
+declare int %wins(int, int, int)
+
+declare ushort %ab_code()