[clang-format] Inconsistent behavior regarding line break before access modifier

Fixes https://llvm.org/PR41870.

Checks for newlines in option Style.EmptyLineBeforeAccessModifier are now based on the formatted new lines and not on the new lines in the file.

Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, curdeius

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99503
This commit is contained in:
Max Sagebaum 2021-04-16 10:02:02 +02:00 committed by Marek Kurdej
parent 8cf650c554
commit fd4e08aa8f
3 changed files with 62 additions and 24 deletions

View File

@ -225,6 +225,10 @@ clang-format
- Option ``EmptyLineAfterAccessModifier`` has been added to remove, force or keep
new lines after access modifiers.
- Checks for newlines in option ``EmptyLineBeforeAccessModifier`` are now based
on the formatted new lines and not on the new lines in the file. (Fixes
https://llvm.org/PR41870.)
libclang
--------

View File

@ -1254,15 +1254,14 @@ void UnwrappedLineFormatter::formatFirstToken(
if (PreviousLine && RootToken.isAccessSpecifier()) {
switch (Style.EmptyLineBeforeAccessModifier) {
case FormatStyle::ELBAMS_Never:
if (RootToken.NewlinesBefore > 1)
if (Newlines > 1)
Newlines = 1;
break;
case FormatStyle::ELBAMS_Leave:
Newlines = std::max(RootToken.NewlinesBefore, 1u);
break;
case FormatStyle::ELBAMS_LogicalBlock:
if (PreviousLine->Last->isOneOf(tok::semi, tok::r_brace) &&
RootToken.NewlinesBefore <= 1)
if (PreviousLine->Last->isOneOf(tok::semi, tok::r_brace) && Newlines <= 1)
Newlines = 2;
if (PreviousLine->First->isAccessSpecifier())
Newlines = 1; // Previous is an access modifier remove all new lines.
@ -1273,8 +1272,7 @@ void UnwrappedLineFormatter::formatFirstToken(
previousToken = PreviousLine->Last->getPreviousNonComment();
else
previousToken = PreviousLine->Last;
if ((!previousToken || !previousToken->is(tok::l_brace)) &&
RootToken.NewlinesBefore <= 1)
if ((!previousToken || !previousToken->is(tok::l_brace)) && Newlines <= 1)
Newlines = 2;
} break;
}

View File

@ -9177,6 +9177,48 @@ TEST_F(FormatTest, FormatsAccessModifiers) {
" int j;\n"
"};\n",
Style);
FormatStyle NoEmptyLines = getLLVMStyle();
NoEmptyLines.MaxEmptyLinesToKeep = 0;
verifyFormat("struct foo {\n"
"private:\n"
" void f() {}\n"
"\n"
"private:\n"
" int i;\n"
"\n"
"public:\n"
"protected:\n"
" int j;\n"
"};\n",
NoEmptyLines);
NoEmptyLines.EmptyLineBeforeAccessModifier = FormatStyle::ELBAMS_Never;
verifyFormat("struct foo {\n"
"private:\n"
" void f() {}\n"
"private:\n"
" int i;\n"
"public:\n"
"protected:\n"
" int j;\n"
"};\n",
NoEmptyLines);
NoEmptyLines.EmptyLineBeforeAccessModifier = FormatStyle::ELBAMS_Always;
verifyFormat("struct foo {\n"
"private:\n"
" void f() {}\n"
"\n"
"private:\n"
" int i;\n"
"\n"
"public:\n"
"\n"
"protected:\n"
" int j;\n"
"};\n",
NoEmptyLines);
}
TEST_F(FormatTest, FormatsAfterAccessModifiers) {
@ -9266,32 +9308,26 @@ TEST_F(FormatTest, FormatsAfterAccessModifiers) {
// Leave tests rely on the code layout, test::messUp can not be used.
Style.EmptyLineAfterAccessModifier = FormatStyle::ELAAMS_Leave;
Style.MaxEmptyLinesToKeep = 0u;
EXPECT_EQ("struct foo {\n"
"private:\n"
" void f() {}\n"
"private:\n"
" int i;\n"
"protected:\n"
" int j;\n"
"};\n",
format("struct foo {\n"
"private:\n"
" void f() {}\n"
"\n"
"private:\n"
" int i;\n"
"\n"
"protected:\n"
" int j;\n"
"};\n",
Style));
verifyFormat("struct foo {\n"
"private:\n"
" void f() {}\n"
"\n"
"private:\n"
" int i;\n"
"\n"
"protected:\n"
" int j;\n"
"};\n",
Style);
// Check if MaxEmptyLinesToKeep is respected.
EXPECT_EQ("struct foo {\n"
"private:\n"
" void f() {}\n"
"\n"
"private:\n"
" int i;\n"
"\n"
"protected:\n"
" int j;\n"
"};\n",