maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity

Add missing 'to' and rephrase an explanation of GCC's assumptions. 

Wordsmithing by Matt Beaumont-Gay in response to r164389.

llvm-svn: 164395
This commit is contained in:
David Blaikie 2012-09-21 18:03:02 +00:00
parent 10958cae09
commit f787f171a3
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
llvm/docs/CodingStandards.rst
View File

@ -830,11 +830,11 @@ off by default but turned on when building LLVM with a version of Clang that
supports the warning. supports the warning.
A knock-on effect of this stylistic requirement is that when building LLVM with A knock-on effect of this stylistic requirement is that when building LLVM with
GCC you may get warnings related "control may reach end of non-void function" GCC you may get warnings related to "control may reach end of non-void function"
if you return from each case of a covered switch-over-enum because GCC assumes if you return from each case of a covered switch-over-enum because GCC assumes
that the enum expression may take any representable value, not just those in that the enum expression may take any representable value, not just those of
the enumeration. To suppress this warning, use ``llvm_unreachable`` after the individual enumerators. To suppress this warning, use ``llvm_unreachable`` after
switch. the switch.
Use ``LLVM_DELETED_FUNCTION`` to mark uncallable methods Use ``LLVM_DELETED_FUNCTION`` to mark uncallable methods
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^