maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity

Add missing 'to' and rephrase an explanation of GCC's assumptions. 

Wordsmithing by Matt Beaumont-Gay in response to r164389.

llvm-svn: 164395
This commit is contained in:
David Blaikie 2012-09-21 18:03:02 +00:00
parent 10958cae09
commit f787f171a3
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
llvm/docs/CodingStandards.rst
View File

@ -830,11 +830,11 @@ off by default but turned on when building LLVM with a version of Clang that
supports the warning.
A knock-on effect of this stylistic requirement is that when building LLVM with
GCC you may get warnings related "control may reach end of non-void function"
GCC you may get warnings related to "control may reach end of non-void function"
if you return from each case of a covered switch-over-enum because GCC assumes
that the enum expression may take any representable value, not just those in
the enumeration. To suppress this warning, use ``llvm_unreachable`` after the
switch.
that the enum expression may take any representable value, not just those of
individual enumerators. To suppress this warning, use ``llvm_unreachable`` after
the switch.
Use ``LLVM_DELETED_FUNCTION`` to mark uncallable methods
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^