From f5a507d009afa7ff89787de5b139fe8d266abb27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 03:58:05 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Testcase for SymbolTable.cpp bug

llvm-svn: 1584
---
 .../Assembler/2002-01-24-BadSymbolTableAssert.ll      | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 llvm/test/Regression/Assembler/2002-01-24-BadSymbolTableAssert.ll

diff --git a/llvm/test/Regression/Assembler/2002-01-24-BadSymbolTableAssert.ll b/llvm/test/Regression/Assembler/2002-01-24-BadSymbolTableAssert.ll
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..d1af3a1549a5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/Regression/Assembler/2002-01-24-BadSymbolTableAssert.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+; This testcase failed due to a bad assertion in SymbolTable.cpp, removed in the 1.20 revision
+; Basically the symbol table assumed that if there was an abstract type in the symbol table,
+; [in this case for the entry %foo of type void(opaque)* ], that there should have also been
+; named types by now.  This was obviously not the case here, and this is valid.  Assertion
+; disabled.
+
+declare void "foo"(%bb)
+%bb = type int 
+
+implementation
+