[clang-format] Don't detect call to ObjC class method as C++11 attribute specifier

Summary:
Previously, clang-format detected something like the following as a C++11 attribute specifier.

  @[[NSArray class]]

instead of an array with an Objective-C method call inside. In general, when the attribute specifier checking runs, if it sees 2 identifiers in a row, it decides that the square brackets represent an Objective-C method call. However, here, `class` is tokenized as a keyword instead of an identifier, so this check fails.

To fix this, the attribute specifier first checks whether the first square bracket has an "@" before it. If it does, then that square bracket is not the start of a attribute specifier because it is an Objective-C array literal. (The assumption is that @[[.*]] is not valid C/C++.)

Contributed by rkgibson2.

Reviewers: benhamilton

Reviewed By: benhamilton

Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64632

llvm-svn: 366267
This commit is contained in:
Ben Hamilton 2019-07-16 21:29:40 +00:00
parent fdc61bce94
commit f4c2d57f76
2 changed files with 11 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -388,6 +388,10 @@ private:
bool isCpp11AttributeSpecifier(const FormatToken &Tok) {
if (!Style.isCpp() || !Tok.startsSequence(tok::l_square, tok::l_square))
return false;
// The first square bracket is part of an ObjC array literal
if (Tok.Previous && Tok.Previous->is(tok::at)) {
return false;
}
const FormatToken *AttrTok = Tok.Next->Next;
if (!AttrTok)
return false;
@ -400,7 +404,7 @@ private:
while (AttrTok && !AttrTok->startsSequence(tok::r_square, tok::r_square)) {
// ObjC message send. We assume nobody will use : in a C++11 attribute
// specifier parameter, although this is technically valid:
// [[foo(:)]]
// [[foo(:)]].
if (AttrTok->is(tok::colon) ||
AttrTok->startsSequence(tok::identifier, tok::identifier) ||
AttrTok->startsSequence(tok::r_paren, tok::identifier))

View File

@ -7027,6 +7027,12 @@ TEST_F(FormatTest, UnderstandsSquareAttributes) {
// On the other hand, we still need to correctly find array subscripts.
verifyFormat("int a = std::vector<int>{1, 2, 3}[0];");
// Make sure that we do not mistake Objective-C method inside array literals
// as attributes, even if those method names are also keywords.
verifyFormat("@[ [foo bar] ];");
verifyFormat("@[ [NSArray class] ];");
verifyFormat("@[ [foo enum] ];");
// Make sure we do not parse attributes as lambda introducers.
FormatStyle MultiLineFunctions = getLLVMStyle();
MultiLineFunctions.AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine = FormatStyle::SFS_None;