[lldb] Fix ppc64 detection in lldb

Currently, ppc64le and ppc64 (defaulting to big endian) have the same
descriptor, thus the linear scan always return ppc64le. Handle that through
subtype.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124760
This commit is contained in:
serge-sans-paille 2022-05-02 12:19:48 +02:00
parent 74634f4b98
commit f114f00948
5 changed files with 24 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -310,9 +310,19 @@ static uint32_t riscvVariantFromElfFlags(const elf::ELFHeader &header) {
}
}
static uint32_t ppc64VariantFromElfFlags(const elf::ELFHeader &header) {
uint32_t endian = header.e_ident[EI_DATA];
if (endian == ELFDATA2LSB)
return ArchSpec::eCore_ppc64le_generic;
else
return ArchSpec::eCore_ppc64_generic;
}
static uint32_t subTypeFromElfHeader(const elf::ELFHeader &header) {
if (header.e_machine == llvm::ELF::EM_MIPS)
return mipsVariantFromElfFlags(header);
else if (header.e_machine == llvm::ELF::EM_PPC64)
return ppc64VariantFromElfFlags(header);
else if (header.e_machine == llvm::ELF::EM_RISCV)
return riscvVariantFromElfFlags(header);

View File

@ -358,10 +358,10 @@ static const ArchDefinitionEntry g_elf_arch_entries[] = {
0xFFFFFFFFu, 0xFFFFFFFFu}, // Intel MCU // FIXME: is this correct?
{ArchSpec::eCore_ppc_generic, llvm::ELF::EM_PPC, LLDB_INVALID_CPUTYPE,
0xFFFFFFFFu, 0xFFFFFFFFu}, // PowerPC
{ArchSpec::eCore_ppc64le_generic, llvm::ELF::EM_PPC64, LLDB_INVALID_CPUTYPE,
0xFFFFFFFFu, 0xFFFFFFFFu}, // PowerPC64le
{ArchSpec::eCore_ppc64_generic, llvm::ELF::EM_PPC64, LLDB_INVALID_CPUTYPE,
0xFFFFFFFFu, 0xFFFFFFFFu}, // PowerPC64
{ArchSpec::eCore_ppc64le_generic, llvm::ELF::EM_PPC64,
ArchSpec::eCore_ppc64le_generic, 0xFFFFFFFFu, 0xFFFFFFFFu}, // PowerPC64le
{ArchSpec::eCore_ppc64_generic, llvm::ELF::EM_PPC64,
ArchSpec::eCore_ppc64_generic, 0xFFFFFFFFu, 0xFFFFFFFFu}, // PowerPC64
{ArchSpec::eCore_arm_generic, llvm::ELF::EM_ARM, LLDB_INVALID_CPUTYPE,
0xFFFFFFFFu, 0xFFFFFFFFu}, // ARM
{ArchSpec::eCore_arm_aarch64, llvm::ELF::EM_AARCH64, LLDB_INVALID_CPUTYPE,
@ -400,8 +400,8 @@ static const ArchDefinitionEntry g_elf_arch_entries[] = {
LLDB_INVALID_CPUTYPE, 0xFFFFFFFFu, 0xFFFFFFFFu}, // HEXAGON
{ArchSpec::eCore_arc, llvm::ELF::EM_ARC_COMPACT2, LLDB_INVALID_CPUTYPE,
0xFFFFFFFFu, 0xFFFFFFFFu}, // ARC
{ArchSpec::eCore_avr, llvm::ELF::EM_AVR, LLDB_INVALID_CPUTYPE,
0xFFFFFFFFu, 0xFFFFFFFFu}, // AVR
{ArchSpec::eCore_avr, llvm::ELF::EM_AVR, LLDB_INVALID_CPUTYPE, 0xFFFFFFFFu,
0xFFFFFFFFu}, // AVR
{ArchSpec::eCore_riscv32, llvm::ELF::EM_RISCV,
ArchSpec::eRISCVSubType_riscv32, 0xFFFFFFFFu, 0xFFFFFFFFu}, // riscv32
{ArchSpec::eCore_riscv64, llvm::ELF::EM_RISCV,

View File

@ -24,12 +24,14 @@ class LinuxCoreTestCase(TestBase):
_i386_pid = 32306
_x86_64_pid = 32259
_s390x_pid = 1045
_ppc64_pid = 28146
_ppc64le_pid = 28147
_aarch64_regions = 4
_i386_regions = 4
_x86_64_regions = 5
_s390x_regions = 2
_ppc64_regions = 2
_ppc64le_regions = 2
@skipIfLLVMTargetMissing("AArch64")
@ -49,6 +51,12 @@ class LinuxCoreTestCase(TestBase):
self.do_test("linux-ppc64le", self._ppc64le_pid, self._ppc64le_regions,
"linux-ppc64le.ou")
@skipIfLLVMTargetMissing("PowerPC")
def test_ppc64(self):
"""Test that lldb can read the process information from an ppc64 linux core file."""
self.do_test("linux-ppc64", self._ppc64_pid, self._ppc64_regions,
"linux-ppc64.ou")
@skipIfLLVMTargetMissing("X86")
def test_x86_64(self):
"""Test that lldb can read the process information from an x86_64 linux core file."""