forked from OSchip/llvm-project
For expression like
"APInt::getAllOnesValue(ShiftAmt).zextOrCopy(BitWidth)", to handle ShiftAmt == BitWidth situation, use zextOrCopy() instead of zext(). llvm-svn: 35080
This commit is contained in:
parent
b9c3707e97
commit
ebe634e662
|
@ -1995,7 +1995,7 @@ bool InstCombiner::SimplifyDemandedBits(Value *V, APInt DemandedMask,
|
|||
RHSKnownZero <<= ShiftAmt;
|
||||
RHSKnownOne <<= ShiftAmt;
|
||||
// low bits known zero.
|
||||
RHSKnownZero |= APInt::getAllOnesValue(ShiftAmt).zext(BitWidth);
|
||||
RHSKnownZero |= APInt::getAllOnesValue(ShiftAmt).zextOrCopy(BitWidth);
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case Instruction::LShr:
|
||||
|
@ -2012,7 +2012,7 @@ bool InstCombiner::SimplifyDemandedBits(Value *V, APInt DemandedMask,
|
|||
assert((RHSKnownZero & RHSKnownOne) == 0 &&
|
||||
"Bits known to be one AND zero?");
|
||||
// Compute the new bits that are at the top now.
|
||||
APInt HighBits(APInt::getAllOnesValue(ShiftAmt).zext(BitWidth).shl(
|
||||
APInt HighBits(APInt::getAllOnesValue(ShiftAmt).zextOrCopy(BitWidth).shl(
|
||||
BitWidth - ShiftAmt));
|
||||
RHSKnownZero &= TypeMask;
|
||||
RHSKnownOne &= TypeMask;
|
||||
|
@ -2046,7 +2046,7 @@ bool InstCombiner::SimplifyDemandedBits(Value *V, APInt DemandedMask,
|
|||
assert((RHSKnownZero & RHSKnownOne) == 0 &&
|
||||
"Bits known to be one AND zero?");
|
||||
// Compute the new bits that are at the top now.
|
||||
APInt HighBits(APInt::getAllOnesValue(ShiftAmt).zext(BitWidth).shl(
|
||||
APInt HighBits(APInt::getAllOnesValue(ShiftAmt).zextOrCopy(BitWidth).shl(
|
||||
BitWidth - ShiftAmt));
|
||||
RHSKnownZero &= TypeMask;
|
||||
RHSKnownOne &= TypeMask;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue