forked from OSchip/llvm-project
[CodeCompletion] Provide member completions for dependent expressions whose
type is a TemplateSpecializationType or InjectedClassNameType Fixes PR30847. Partially fixes PR20973 (first position only). PR17614 is still not working, its expression has the dependent builtin type. We'll have to teach the completion engine how to "resolve" dependent expressions to fix it. rdar://29818301 llvm-svn: 302797
This commit is contained in:
parent
0fe0d98557
commit
e6afa397c6
|
@ -3068,7 +3068,8 @@ public:
|
|||
bool IncludeGlobalScope = true);
|
||||
void LookupVisibleDecls(DeclContext *Ctx, LookupNameKind Kind,
|
||||
VisibleDeclConsumer &Consumer,
|
||||
bool IncludeGlobalScope = true);
|
||||
bool IncludeGlobalScope = true,
|
||||
bool IncludeDependentBases = false);
|
||||
|
||||
enum CorrectTypoKind {
|
||||
CTK_NonError, // CorrectTypo used in a non error recovery situation.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -3881,7 +3881,8 @@ static void AddRecordMembersCompletionResults(Sema &SemaRef,
|
|||
Results.allowNestedNameSpecifiers();
|
||||
CodeCompletionDeclConsumer Consumer(Results, SemaRef.CurContext);
|
||||
SemaRef.LookupVisibleDecls(RD, Sema::LookupMemberName, Consumer,
|
||||
SemaRef.CodeCompleter->includeGlobals());
|
||||
SemaRef.CodeCompleter->includeGlobals(),
|
||||
/*IncludeDependentBases=*/true);
|
||||
|
||||
if (SemaRef.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus) {
|
||||
if (!Results.empty()) {
|
||||
|
@ -3949,6 +3950,16 @@ void Sema::CodeCompleteMemberReferenceExpr(Scope *S, Expr *Base,
|
|||
if (const RecordType *Record = BaseType->getAs<RecordType>()) {
|
||||
AddRecordMembersCompletionResults(*this, Results, S, BaseType,
|
||||
Record->getDecl());
|
||||
} else if (const auto *TST = BaseType->getAs<TemplateSpecializationType>()) {
|
||||
TemplateName TN = TST->getTemplateName();
|
||||
if (const auto *TD =
|
||||
dyn_cast_or_null<ClassTemplateDecl>(TN.getAsTemplateDecl())) {
|
||||
CXXRecordDecl *RD = TD->getTemplatedDecl();
|
||||
AddRecordMembersCompletionResults(*this, Results, S, BaseType, RD);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if (const auto *ICNT = BaseType->getAs<InjectedClassNameType>()) {
|
||||
if (auto *RD = ICNT->getDecl())
|
||||
AddRecordMembersCompletionResults(*this, Results, S, BaseType, RD);
|
||||
} else if (!IsArrow && BaseType->isObjCObjectPointerType()) {
|
||||
// Objective-C property reference.
|
||||
AddedPropertiesSet AddedProperties;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -3445,7 +3445,8 @@ static void LookupVisibleDecls(DeclContext *Ctx, LookupResult &Result,
|
|||
bool QualifiedNameLookup,
|
||||
bool InBaseClass,
|
||||
VisibleDeclConsumer &Consumer,
|
||||
VisibleDeclsRecord &Visited) {
|
||||
VisibleDeclsRecord &Visited,
|
||||
bool IncludeDependentBases = false) {
|
||||
if (!Ctx)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -3501,7 +3502,8 @@ static void LookupVisibleDecls(DeclContext *Ctx, LookupResult &Result,
|
|||
ShadowContextRAII Shadow(Visited);
|
||||
for (auto I : Ctx->using_directives()) {
|
||||
LookupVisibleDecls(I->getNominatedNamespace(), Result,
|
||||
QualifiedNameLookup, InBaseClass, Consumer, Visited);
|
||||
QualifiedNameLookup, InBaseClass, Consumer, Visited,
|
||||
IncludeDependentBases);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -3513,14 +3515,28 @@ static void LookupVisibleDecls(DeclContext *Ctx, LookupResult &Result,
|
|||
for (const auto &B : Record->bases()) {
|
||||
QualType BaseType = B.getType();
|
||||
|
||||
// Don't look into dependent bases, because name lookup can't look
|
||||
// there anyway.
|
||||
if (BaseType->isDependentType())
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
const RecordType *Record = BaseType->getAs<RecordType>();
|
||||
if (!Record)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
RecordDecl *RD;
|
||||
if (BaseType->isDependentType()) {
|
||||
if (!IncludeDependentBases) {
|
||||
// Don't look into dependent bases, because name lookup can't look
|
||||
// there anyway.
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
const auto *TST = BaseType->getAs<TemplateSpecializationType>();
|
||||
if (!TST)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
TemplateName TN = TST->getTemplateName();
|
||||
const auto *TD =
|
||||
dyn_cast_or_null<ClassTemplateDecl>(TN.getAsTemplateDecl());
|
||||
if (!TD)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
RD = TD->getTemplatedDecl();
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
const auto *Record = BaseType->getAs<RecordType>();
|
||||
if (!Record)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
RD = Record->getDecl();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// FIXME: It would be nice to be able to determine whether referencing
|
||||
// a particular member would be ambiguous. For example, given
|
||||
|
@ -3543,8 +3559,8 @@ static void LookupVisibleDecls(DeclContext *Ctx, LookupResult &Result,
|
|||
|
||||
// Find results in this base class (and its bases).
|
||||
ShadowContextRAII Shadow(Visited);
|
||||
LookupVisibleDecls(Record->getDecl(), Result, QualifiedNameLookup,
|
||||
true, Consumer, Visited);
|
||||
LookupVisibleDecls(RD, Result, QualifiedNameLookup, true, Consumer,
|
||||
Visited, IncludeDependentBases);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -3713,7 +3729,8 @@ void Sema::LookupVisibleDecls(Scope *S, LookupNameKind Kind,
|
|||
|
||||
void Sema::LookupVisibleDecls(DeclContext *Ctx, LookupNameKind Kind,
|
||||
VisibleDeclConsumer &Consumer,
|
||||
bool IncludeGlobalScope) {
|
||||
bool IncludeGlobalScope,
|
||||
bool IncludeDependentBases) {
|
||||
LookupResult Result(*this, DeclarationName(), SourceLocation(), Kind);
|
||||
Result.setAllowHidden(Consumer.includeHiddenDecls());
|
||||
VisibleDeclsRecord Visited;
|
||||
|
@ -3721,7 +3738,8 @@ void Sema::LookupVisibleDecls(DeclContext *Ctx, LookupNameKind Kind,
|
|||
Visited.visitedContext(Context.getTranslationUnitDecl());
|
||||
ShadowContextRAII Shadow(Visited);
|
||||
::LookupVisibleDecls(Ctx, Result, /*QualifiedNameLookup=*/true,
|
||||
/*InBaseClass=*/false, Consumer, Visited);
|
||||
/*InBaseClass=*/false, Consumer, Visited,
|
||||
IncludeDependentBases);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// LookupOrCreateLabel - Do a name lookup of a label with the specified name.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -66,3 +66,83 @@ struct Bar {
|
|||
|
||||
// Make sure this also doesn't crash
|
||||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -code-completion-at=%s:47:14 %s
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
template<typename T>
|
||||
class BaseTemplate {
|
||||
public:
|
||||
T baseTemplateFunction();
|
||||
|
||||
T baseTemplateField;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
template<typename T, typename S>
|
||||
class TemplateClass: public Base1 , public BaseTemplate<T> {
|
||||
public:
|
||||
T function() { }
|
||||
T field;
|
||||
|
||||
void overload1(const T &);
|
||||
void overload1(const S &);
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
template<typename T, typename S>
|
||||
void completeDependentMembers(TemplateClass<T, S> &object,
|
||||
TemplateClass<int, S> *object2) {
|
||||
object.field;
|
||||
object2->field;
|
||||
// CHECK-CC2: baseTemplateField : [#T#][#BaseTemplate<T>::#]baseTemplateField
|
||||
// CHECK-CC2: baseTemplateFunction : [#T#][#BaseTemplate<T>::#]baseTemplateFunction()
|
||||
// CHECK-CC2: field : [#T#]field
|
||||
// CHECK-CC2: function : [#T#]function()
|
||||
// CHECK-CC2: member1 : [#int#][#Base1::#]member1
|
||||
// CHECK-CC2: member2 : [#float#][#Base1::#]member2
|
||||
// CHECK-CC2: overload1 : [#void#]overload1(<#const T &#>)
|
||||
// CHECK-CC2: overload1 : [#void#]overload1(<#const S &#>)
|
||||
|
||||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -code-completion-at=%s:92:10 %s -o - | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-CC2 %s
|
||||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -code-completion-at=%s:93:12 %s -o - | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-CC2 %s
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
void completeDependentSpecializedMembers(TemplateClass<int, double> &object,
|
||||
TemplateClass<int, double> *object2) {
|
||||
object.field;
|
||||
object2->field;
|
||||
// CHECK-CC3: baseTemplateField : [#int#][#BaseTemplate<int>::#]baseTemplateField
|
||||
// CHECK-CC3: baseTemplateFunction : [#int#][#BaseTemplate<int>::#]baseTemplateFunction()
|
||||
// CHECK-CC3: field : [#int#]field
|
||||
// CHECK-CC3: function : [#int#]function()
|
||||
// CHECK-CC3: member1 : [#int#][#Base1::#]member1
|
||||
// CHECK-CC3: member2 : [#float#][#Base1::#]member2
|
||||
// CHECK-CC3: overload1 : [#void#]overload1(<#const int &#>)
|
||||
// CHECK-CC3: overload1 : [#void#]overload1(<#const double &#>)
|
||||
|
||||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -code-completion-at=%s:110:10 %s -o - | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-CC3 %s
|
||||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -code-completion-at=%s:111:12 %s -o - | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-CC3 %s
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
template <typename T>
|
||||
class Template {
|
||||
public:
|
||||
BaseTemplate<int> o1;
|
||||
BaseTemplate<T> o2;
|
||||
|
||||
void function() {
|
||||
o1.baseTemplateField;
|
||||
// CHECK-CC4: BaseTemplate : BaseTemplate::
|
||||
// CHECK-CC4: baseTemplateField : [#int#]baseTemplateField
|
||||
// CHECK-CC4: baseTemplateFunction : [#int#]baseTemplateFunction()
|
||||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -code-completion-at=%s:132:8 %s -o - | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-CC4 %s
|
||||
o2.baseTemplateField;
|
||||
// CHECK-CC5: BaseTemplate : BaseTemplate::
|
||||
// CHECK-CC5: baseTemplateField : [#T#]baseTemplateField
|
||||
// CHECK-CC5: baseTemplateFunction : [#T#]baseTemplateFunction()
|
||||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -code-completion-at=%s:137:8 %s -o - | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-CC5 %s
|
||||
this->o1;
|
||||
// CHECK-CC6: [#void#]function()
|
||||
// CHECK-CC6: o1 : [#BaseTemplate<int>#]o1
|
||||
// CHECK-CC6: o2 : [#BaseTemplate<T>#]o2
|
||||
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -code-completion-at=%s:142:11 %s -o - | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-CC6 %s
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue