maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity

Mark LWG Issue #2288 as complete. This was wording cleanup, no code changes required. 

Also mark #2104 as complete. Leave the implementation in libc++ as noexcept, since 
implementations are allowed to add noexcept to non-virtual calls. If we throw from
unique_lock& operator=(unique_lock&& u), then that means the preconditions were violated,
and calling terminate() (as a result of throwing from a noexcept function) is as
good example of undefined behavior as any other.

llvm-svn: 204653
This commit is contained in:
Marshall Clow 2014-03-24 18:38:01 +00:00
parent b04fb08c8a
commit e2db85a968
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
libcxx/www/cxx1y_status.html
View File

@ -265,14 +265,14 @@
<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2357">2357</a></td><td>Remaining "Assignable" requirement</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2359">2359</a></td><td>How does regex_constants::nosubs affect basic_regex::mark_count()?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2360">2360</a></td><td>reverse_iterator::operator*() is unimplementable</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2104">2104</a></td><td>unique_lock move-assignment should not be noexcept</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2104">2104</a></td><td>unique_lock move-assignment should not be noexcept</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2186">2186</a></td><td>Incomplete action on async/launch::deferred</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2075">2075</a></td><td>Progress guarantees, lock-free property, and scheduling assumptions</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2288">2288</a></td><td>Inconsistent requirements for shared mutexes</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2288">2288</a></td><td>Inconsistent requirements for shared mutexes</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<!-- <tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr> -->
</table>
<p>Last Updated: 07-Mar-2014</p>
<p>Last Updated: 24-Mar-2014</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>